Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Spondyloarthritis: state of the art and future perspectives
  1. Désirée van der Heijde1,
  2. Walter P Maksymowych2
  1. 1Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
  2. 2University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Désirée van der Heijde, Department of Rheumatology, C1R, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands; d.vanderheijde{at}kpnplanet.nl

Abstract

Advances in the understanding of this group of arthritides over the past decade can be considered transformational from the perspective of basic mechanisms as well as clinical research focusing on the development of imaging technologies and a spectrum of standardised clinical outcomes that aim at a more comprehensive understanding of disease activity, functioning and disability, and prognosis. Prior to this decade, treatment was unsatisfactory and limited to physical modalities and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, while diagnostic ascertainment primarily focused on clinical evaluation and plain radiography. Today, patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) can look forward to earlier diagnosis and more effective treatment but significant challenges remain. This review will summarise the past decade's major accomplishments in the understanding of the basic mechanisms contributing to the development of SpA, outline those advances in clinical and imaging outcomes that have enabled major therapeutic advances and now permit a broader understanding of the early development of disease and its impact on patient well-being, and will describe new approaches to the development of diagnostic criteria that incorporate advances in imaging.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Competing interests DvdH is a consultant for Abbott, Centocor, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Schering-Plough, UCB and Wyeth. WM is a consultant for Abbott, Centocor, Pfizer, Schering-Plough and Wyeth.