Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis (IRF) is a rare disease, characterised by a fibroinflammatory tissue surrounding the aortoiliac axis and frequently entrapping the ureters.1 ,2 Glucocorticoids effectively induce remission, but 24% to 72% of patients relapse, half of them repeatedly.3 ,4 Immunosuppressants and glucocorticoids are usually required in relapsing IRF but no studies are available.
In this prospective, open-label trial we enrolled 16 relapsing patients with IRF (July 2004 to April 2011) aged 18–85 years and with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)>50 ml/min5 after ureteral decompression (if required), and treated them with methotrexate and prednisone for 12 months. Relapse was defined in case of mass enlargement, hydronephrosis, or disease-related symptoms associated with high inflammatory markers.3 Prednisone was given at 0.5–1 mg/kg/day depending on flare severity, tapered to 12.5–10 mg/day by month 3, 7.5–5 mg/day by month 6 and maintained at 5–2.5 mg/day until month 12. Methotrexate was given at 15–20 mg/week until month 12. After month 12, the clinician was free to continue or withdraw the treatment.
The primary endpoint was remission (at month 12) defined as a stable, reduced mass and absence of hydronephrosis, disease-related symptoms and normal inflammatory markers.3 Secondary endpoints were changes in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C reactive protein (CRP), IRF thickness and eGFR at 6–12 months and last follow-up. Patients who relapsed or stopped treatment for toxicity were considered treatment failures.
Differences in eGFR, ESR, CRP and IRF thickness were assessed using the Wilcoxon test, and relapse-free survival by the Kaplan–Meier method with comparisons between patient subgroups analysed via the log-rank test. The trial is registered with Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12612000845831) and was approved by the local ethics committee.
Of the 16 enrolled patients, 10 (63%) were men; the median age was 60 years. Seven patients received an initial prednisone dose of 0.8–1 mg/kg/day while nine received 0.5–0.7 mg/kg/day; the median highest methotrexate dose was 15 mg/week (IQR 14.5–17.5); the median follow-up was 24 months. Six (37%) patients had hydronephrosis and two acute renal failure.
During the first year, one patient was lost to follow-up (month 4) and one autonomously stopped treatment (month 6). The remaining 14 were assessable for response at month 12; 11 (79%) were in remission and 3 had treatment failures (due to toxicity in 1 patient and relapse in 2); the median prednisone dose at month 12 was 5 mg/day. Relapse-free survival is shown in figure 1.
Renal function normalised in the two patients with acute renal failure (one of them required unilateral ureteral stenting). At entry, six patients had hydronephrosis and three had a stent; at month 12, only one had hydronephrosis and two had a stent. At month 12, the median eGFR was 82 ml/min (IQR 65.8–91.5) (vs 62.8 at baseline (p=0.234)). ESR and CRP significantly decreased, whereas IRF thickness showed only a slight reduction (figure 2).
Among 11 patients in remission at month 12, 4 stopped treatment relapsing soon afterwards, whereas the 7 patients who continued treatment remained in remission, showing a longer relapse-free survival (p<0.005) (figure 1).
During the study one patient discontinued treatment for toxicity (sepsis and liver toxicity); one temporarily stopped methotrexate for enterocolitis and one reduced it for fatigue.
Our results show that methotrexate plus prednisone is a feasible option for relapsing IRF. Although different immunosuppressive agents have been successfully used for IRF,6–9 none of them has been systematically studied in relapsing patients; biological agents may have a role but larger studies are required.10 Our regimen induced remission in a considerable proportion of patients; acute-phase reactants normalised and renal outcome was excellent. Treatment-related toxicity was limited. After treatment withdrawal, patients may be at high risk of relapse and should be closely followed-up.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr Francesco Ferrozzi, Radiology, Istituto Figlie di San Camillo, Cremona (Italy) for his support with CT and MRI scan assessment.
References
Footnotes
-
Contributors AV, FA and CB designed the work, followed the patients, analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. AP, MLU, LM, EO and LM followed the patients, collected the data and contributed to generating the figures. SF was in charge of the urological follow-up of the patients. RC analysed imaging studies.
-
Funding This work was supported by the University Hospital of Parma (non-monetary support). The supporter did not have any role in study design.
-
Competing interests None.
-
Patient consent Obtained.
-
Ethics approval Ethical Committee of Parma.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.