Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evidence of effectiveness: How much can we extrapolate from existing studies?

  • Published:
The AAPS Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drug development can be a science of extrapolation if the use of a drug exposure-response relationship is embraced and implemented through mechanistically oriented pharmacokinetic (PK)-pharmacodynamic (PD) modeling analysis and clinical trial simulation. The traditional requirement of at least 2 adequate and well-controlled phase III studies by the US Food and Drug Administration for drug approval can be waived in certain situations, substantially reducing the resources and time. In this article, the authors introduce a real drug development case where the chance for this exemption was maximized by actively using PK-PD modeling followed by clinical trial simulation, resulting in faster and more economical introduction of a new dosage regimen to patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sheiner LB, Steimer JL. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling in drug development.Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2000;40:67–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry.Exposure-Response Relationships—Study Design, Data Analysis, and Regulatory Applications. Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Administration, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sheiner LB. Learning versus confirming in clinical drug development.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1997;61:275–291.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry.Providing Clinical Evidence of Effectiveness for Human Drug and Biological Products. Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Administration, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. The US Congress. The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended in 1962. Pub. L. No. 87-781, 76 Stat. 780. 1962.

  6. The US Congress. The Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997. Pub. L. No. 105-115, 111 Stat. 2295. 1997.

  7. Peck CC, Rubin DB, Sheiner LB. Hypothesis: a single clinical trial plus causal evidence of effectiveness is sufficient for drug approval.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2003;73:481–490.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dower SK, Smith CA, Park LS. Human cytokine receptors.J Clin Immunol. 1990;10:289–299.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Moreland LW, Cohen SB, Baumgartner SW, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of etanercept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.J Rheumatol. 2001;28:1238–1244.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bathon JM, Martin RW, Fleischmann RM, et al. A comparison of etanercept and methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1586–1593.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Label for Enbrel® (etanercept). 2004.

  12. Korth-Bradley JM, Rubin AS, Hanna RK, Simcoe DK, Lebsack ME. The pharmacokinetics of etanercept in healthy volunteers.Ann Pharmacother. 2000;34:161–164.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lebsack ME, Hanna RK, Lange MA. Absolute bioavailability of TNF receptor fusion protein following subcutaneous injection in healthy volunteers.Pharmacotherapy. 1997;17:1181–1189.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lee H, Kimko HC, Rogge M, Wang D, Nestorov I, Peck CC. Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of etanercept using logistic regression analysis.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2003;73:348–365.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Immunex. Data on File, Etanercept. 1999.

  16. Bonate PL. Clinical trial simulation in drug development.Pharm Res. 2000;17:252–256.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kimko HC, Reele SS, Holford NH, Peck CC. Prediction of the outcome of a phase 3 clinical trial of an antischizophrenic agent (quetiapine fumarate) by simulation with a population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2000;68:568–577.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee H, Kimko HC, Rogge M, Wang D, Nestorov I, Peck CC. 50 mg once weekly subcutaneous regimen of etanercept will yield an overlapping steady state time-concentration profile with 25 mg twice weekly dosing.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002;71:90.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Keystone EC, Schiff MH, Kremer JM, et al. Once-weekly administration of 50 mg etanercept in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:353–363.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yim DS, Zhou H, Buckwalter M, Nestorov I, Peck CC Lee H. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and simulation of the time-concentration profile of etanercept in pediatric patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.J Clin Pharmacol. 2005;45:246–256.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Amgen. FDA approves enbrel for once-weekly dosing: new dosing option offers convenience to patients while providing comparable efficacy and tolerability. Amgen press release. October 23, 2003.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Howard Lee.

Additional information

Published: October 5, 2005

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, H., Yim, DS., Zhou, H. et al. Evidence of effectiveness: How much can we extrapolate from existing studies?. AAPS J 7, 47 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1208/aapsj070247

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/aapsj070247

Keywords

Navigation