Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome

Abstract

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by recurrent vascular thrombosis and pregnancy losses. Laboratory diagnosis of APS relies on the demonstration of a positive anticardiolipin antibody test by an in-house or commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, or on the presence of lupus anticoagulant by a coagulation-based test. Persistence of the positive results must be demonstrated, and other causes and underlying factors considered. Although it is universally recognized that the routine screening tests (anticardiolipin antibody or lupus anticoagulant) might miss some cases of APS, careful differential diagnosis and repeat testing are mandatory before the diagnosis of 'seronegative APS' can be made. Correct identification of patients with APS is important because prophylactic anticoagulant therapy can prevent thrombosis from recurring and treatment of affected women during pregnancy can improve fetal and maternal outcome.

Key Points

  • Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is the most common acquired thrombophilia

  • Venous and arterial thrombosis in young individuals, and pregnancy morbidity, are the hallmarks of the disease

  • In the clinical setting, testing for both anticardiolipin antibodies and lupus anticoagulant is essential for the diagnosis of APS

  • Differential diagnoses must be considered before labelling a patient as having 'seronegative APS'

  • Correct identification of patients with APS is important, because prophylactic anticoagulant therapy can prevent thrombosis from recurring

  • Treatment of affected women during pregnancy can improve fetal and maternal outcomes

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hughes GRV (1983) Thrombosis, abortion, cerebral disease, and the lupus anticoagulant. Br Med J 287: 1088–1089

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wilson WA et al. (1999) International consensus statement on preliminary classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome: report of an international workshop. Arthritis Rheum 42: 1309–1311

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Asherson RA et al. (1989) The “primary” antiphospholipid syndrome: major clinical and serological features. Medicine (Baltimore) 68: 366–374

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vianna JL et al. (1994) Comparison of the primary and secondary antiphospholipid syndrome: a European Multicenter Study of 114 patients. Am J Med 96: 3–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Finazzi G et al. (1996) Natural history and risk factors for thrombosis in 360 patients with antiphospholipid antibodies: a four-year prospective study from the Italian Registry. Am J Med 100: 530–536

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Krnic-Barrie S et al. (1997) A retrospective review of 61 patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. Analysis of factors influencing recurrent thrombosis. Arch Intern Med 157: 2101–2108

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Godfrey T and D'Cruz D (2000) Antiphospholipid syndrome: general features. In Hughes syndrome, 8–19 (Ed Khamashta MA) London: Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  8. Khamashta MA et al. (1995) The management of thrombosis in the antiphospholipid-antibody syndrome. N Engl J Med 332: 993–997

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Branch DW and Khamashta MA (2003) Antiphospholipid syndrome: obstetric diagnosis, management and controversies. Obstet Gynecol 101: 1333–1344

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wasserman A et al. (1906) Eine serodiagnostische reaktion bei syphilis. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 32: 745–746

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pangborn MC (1941) A new serologically active phospholipid from beef heart. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 48: 484–486

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Haserick JR and Long R (1952) Systemic lupus erythematosus preceded by false-positive serologic test for syphilis: presentation of five cases. Ann Intern Med 37: 559–565

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Harris EN et al. (1983) Anticardiolipin antibodies: detection by radioimmunoassay and association with thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lancet 2: 1211–1214

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Blank M et al. (1991) Induction of antiphospholipid syndrome in naive mice with mouse lupus monoclonal and human polyclonal anticardiolipin antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 3069–3073

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Pierangeli SS et al. (1995) Induction of thrombosis in a mouse model by IgG, IgM and IgA immunoglobulins from patients with the antiphospholipid syndrome. Thromb Haemost 74: 1361–1367

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pierangeli SS and Harris EN (1997) In vivo models for thrombosis for the antiphospholipid syndrome. Lupus 5: 451–455

    Google Scholar 

  17. Del Papa N et al. (1997) Endothelial cells as target for antiphospholipid antibodies. Human polyclonal and monoclonal anti-beta 2-glycoprotein I antibodies react in vitro with endothelial cells through adherent beta 2-glycoprotein I and induce endothelial activation. Arthritis Rheum 40: 551–561

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Reverter JC et al. (1998) Effects of human monoclonal anticardiolipin antibodies on platelet function and on tissue factor expression on monocytes. Arthritis Rheum 41: 1420–1427

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Campbell AL et al. (1995) Comparison of the effects of anticardiolipin antibodies from patients with the antiphospholipid syndrome and with syphilis on platelet activation and aggregation. Thromb Haemost 73: 529–534

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Smirnov MD et al. (1995) On the role of phosphatidylethanolamine in the inhibition of activated protein C activity by antiphospholipid antibodies. J Clin Invest 95: 309–316

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Holers VM et al. (2002) Complement C3 activation is required for antiphospholipid antibody-induced fetal loss. J Exp Med 195: 211–220

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Girardi G et al. (2003) Complement C5a receptors and neutrophils mediate fetal injury in the antiphospholipid syndrome. J Clin Invest 112: 1644–1654

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Cervera R et al. (2002) Antiphospholipid syndrome: clinical and immunologic manifestations and patterns of disease expression in a cohort of 1,000 patients. Arthritis Rheum 46: 1019–1027

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shah NM et al. (1998) Outcome of patients with anticardiolipin antibodies: a 10-year follow-up of 52 patients. Lupus 7: 3–6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Levine SR et al. (1990) Cerebrovascular and neurologic disease associated with antiphospholipid antibodies: 48 cases. Neurology 40: 1181–1189

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Brey RL et al. (1990) Antiphospholipid antibodies and cerebral ischemia in young people. Neurology 40: 1190–1196

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. The Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Stroke Study (APASS) Group (1993) Anticardiolipin antibodies are an independent risk factor for first ischemic stroke. Neurology 43: 2069–2073

  28. Camerlingo M et al. (1995) Anticardiolipin antibodies in acute non-hemorrhagic stroke seen within six hours after onset. Acta Neurol Scand 92: 69–71

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Levine SR et al. (1995) Recurrent stroke and thrombo-occlusive events in the antiphospholipid syndrome. Ann Neurol 38: 119–124

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Brey RL et al. (2001) Beta(2)-Glycoprotein 1-dependent anticardiolipin antibodies and risk of ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction: the Honolulu Heart Program. Stroke 32: 1701–1706

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Montalban J et al. (1994) Value of immunologic testing in stroke patients. A prospective multicenter study. Stroke 25: 2412–2415

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ginsburg KS et al. (1992) Anticardiolipin antibodies and the risk for ischemic stroke and venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 117: 997–1002

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. The Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Stroke Study (APASS) Group (1997) Anticardiolipin antibodies and the risk of recurrent thrombo-occlusive events and death. Neurology 48: 91–94

  34. Carhuapoma JR et al. (1997) Cerebral venous thrombosis and anticardiolipin antibodies. Stroke 28: 2363–2369

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Deschiens MA et al. (1996) Coagulation studies, factor V Leiden, and anticardiolipin antibodies in 40 cases of cerebral venous thrombosis. Stroke 27: 1724–1730

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ijdo JW et al. (1999) Anti-phospholipid antibodies in patients with multiple sclerosis and MS-like illnesses: MS or APS? Lupus 8: 109–115

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cuadrado MJ et al. (2000) Can neurologic manifestations of Hughes (antiphospholipid) syndrome be distinguished from multiple sclerosis? Analysis of 27 patients and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 79: 57–68

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Nochy D et al. (1999) The intrarenal vascular lesions associated with primary antiphospholipid syndrome. J Am Soc Nephrol 10: 507–518

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sangle SR et al. (2003) Renal artery stenosis in the antiphospholipid (Hughes) syndrome and hypertension. Ann Rheum Dis 62: 999–1002

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Branch DW et al. (1985) Obstetric complications associated with the lupus anticoagulant. N Engl J Med 313: 1322–1326

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lockshin MD et al. (1985) Antibody to cardiolipin as a predictor of fetal distress or death in pregnant patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med 313: 152–156

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Branch DW et al. (1992) Outcome of treated pregnancies in women with antiphospholipid syndrome: an update of the Utah experience. Obstet Gynecol 80: 614–620

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Caruso A et al. (1993) Pregnancy outcome in relation to uterine artery flow velocity waveforms and clinical characteristics in women with antiphospholipid syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 82: 970–977

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lima F et al. (1996) A study of sixty pregnancies in patients with the antiphospholipid syndrome. Clin Exp Rheumatol 14: 131–136

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Duckitt K and Harrington D (2005) Risk factors for pre-eclampsia at antenatal booking: systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ 330: 565

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Lockshin MD et al. (2000) Validation of the Sapporo criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 43: 440–443

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Mouritsen S et al. (1989) The specificity of anti-cardiolipin antibodies from syphilis patients and from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Immunol 76: 178–183

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Harris EN et al. (1988) Use of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and of inhibition studies to distinguish between antibodies to cardiolipin from patients with syphilis or autoimmune disorders. J Infect Dis 157: 23–31

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Galvez J et al. (1997) Thrombophlebitis in a patient with acute Q fever and anticardiolipin antibodies. Med Clin (Barc) 108: 396–397

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Intrator L et al. (1988) Anticardiolipin antibodies in HIV infected patients with or without immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Br J Haematol 68: 269–270

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Schulman S et al. (1998) Anticardiolipin antibodies predict early recurrence of thromboembolism and death among patients with venous thromboembolism following anticoagulant therapy. Duration of Anticoagulation Study Group. Am J Med 104: 332–338

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Escalante A et al. (1995) Accuracy of anticardiolipin antibodies in identifying a history of thrombosis among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Med 98: 559–565

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Levine SR et al. (1997) IgG anticardiolipin antibody titer >40 GPL and the risk of subsequent thrombo-occlusive events and death. A prospective cohort study. Stroke 28: 1660–1665

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Matsuura E et al. (1994) Anticardiolipin antibodies recognize beta 2-glycoprotein I structure altered by interacting with an oxygen modified solid phase surface. J Exp Med 179: 457–462

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Amengual O et al. (1996) Specificity of ELISA for antibody to beta 2-glycoprotein I in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. Br J Rheumatol 35: 1239–1243

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Cabral AR et al. (1996) The antiphospholipid/cofactor syndrome: a primary variant with antibodies to b2 glycoprotein I but no antibodies detectable in standard antiphospholipid assay. Am J Med 101: 472–481

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Levine JS et al. (2002) The antiphospholipid syndrome. N Engl J Med 346: 752–63

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Hughes GR (2003) Migraine, memory loss, and “multiple sclerosis”. Neurological features of the antiphospholipid (Hughes') syndrome. Postgrad Med J 79: 81–83

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Brandt JT et al. (1995) Criteria for the diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants: an update. On behalf of the Subcommittee on Lupus anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibody of the Scientific and Standardisation Committee of the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Thromb Haemost 74: 1185–1190

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Greaves M et al. (2000) Guidelines on the investigation and management of the antiphospholipid syndrome. Br J Haematol 109: 704–715

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Pengo V et al. (1987) Immunological specificity and mechanism of action of IgG lupus anticoagulants. Blood 70: 69–76

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Galli M et al. (1993) Effect of antiphospholipid antibodies on procoagulant activity of activated platelets and platelet-derived microvesicles. Br J Haematol 83: 466–472

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Triplett DA et al. (1988) The relationship between lupus anticoagulants and antibodies to phospholipid. JAMA 259: 550–554

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. McNeil HP et al. (1989) Anticardiolipin antibodies and lupus anticoagulants comprise separate antibody subgroups with different phospholipid binding characteristics. Br J Haematol 73: 506–513

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Wahl DG et al. (1997) Risk for venous thrombosis related to antiphospholipid antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus—a meta-analysis. Lupus 6: 467–473

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Wahl DG et al. (1998) Meta-analysis of the risk of venous thrombosis in individuals with antiphospholipid antibodies without underlying autoimmune disease or previous thrombosis. Lupus 7: 15–22

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Somers E et al. (2002) Antiphospholipid antibodies and incidence of venous thrombosis in a cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 29: 2531–2536

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Galli M et al. (2003) Lupus anticoagulants are stronger risk factors for thrombosis than anticardiolipin antibodies in the antiphospholipid syndrome: a systematic review of the literature. Blood 101: 1827–1832

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Galli M et al. (2003) Anti-beta 2-glycoprotein I, antiprothrombin antibodies, and the risk of thrombosis in the antiphospholipid syndrome. Blood 102: 2717–2723

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Hughes GR and Khamashta MA (2003) Seronegative antiphospholipid syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 62: 1127

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Bertolaccini ML et al. (2001) The value of IgA antiphospholipid testing for the diagnosis of antiphospholipid (Hughes) syndrome in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 28: 2637–2643

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Molina JF et al. (1997) Variability of anticardiolipin antibody isotype distribution in 3 geographic populations of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 24: 291–296

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Diri E et al. (1999) Antiphospholipid (Hughes') syndrome in African-Americans: IgA aCL and abeta2 glycoprotein-I is the most frequent isotype. Lupus 8: 263–268

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Graham RV Hughes.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bertolaccini, M., Khamashta, M. & Hughes, G. Diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome. Nat Rev Rheumatol 1, 40–46 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncprheum0017

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncprheum0017

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing