Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Assortative Mating in Mice and the Incest Taboo

Abstract

FEMALES from some inbred strains of Mus musculus, in a state of induced oestrus, when allowed to choose between a male of their own strain and another of a different strain, prefer to associate and mate with males of the different strain. This phenomenon was studied by Mainardi1 in the C57BL and Swiss strains, and by us (ref. 2 and unpublished results) in the strains BALB/Ibg, DBA/Ibg, C57BL/Ibg, C57BL/J and C3H/J. Our study suggested the existence of a polymorphism for female mating preference, since females from the BALB/Ibg and C3H/J strains mated at random. Observations of the behaviour of females reared with foster fathers showed that a major determinant of mating preference is a “paternal effect”. DBA/Ibg males, due to their genotype, provide social stimuli which induce a tendency in their daughters for mating preference for unlike males, whereas BALB/Ibg males do not induce any tendency for mating preference in their daughters.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mainardi, D., Atti Assoc. Genet. It., 9, 141 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yanai, J., and McClearn, G. E., Behav. Genet., 2, No. 2/3 173 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McClearn, G. E., Wilson, J. R., and Meredith, W., in Contributions to Behavior-Genetic Analysis: The Mouse as a Prototype (edit. by Lindzey, G., and Thiessen, D. D.) (Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lindzey, G., Amer. Psychol., 22, 1051 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lowther, J. K., Canad. J. Psychol., 39, 281 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sheppard, P. M., Heredity, 6, 239 (1952).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

YANAI, J., MCCLEARN, G. Assortative Mating in Mice and the Incest Taboo. Nature 238, 281–282 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1038/238281a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/238281a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing