Elsevier

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

Volume 15, Issue 11, November 2007, Pages 1225-1234
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

MRI-derived T2 relaxation times and cartilage morphometry of the tibio-femoral joint in subjects with and without osteoarthritis during a 1-year follow-up

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2007.04.018Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Summary

Objective

To assess differences in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based compositional (T2) and morphometric (volume and thickness) parameters of the tibio-femoral joint cartilage in subjects with and without osteoarthritis (OA) and compare these with clinical assessment tools during a 1-year follow-up.

Method

Three Tesla MRI of the knee joint was performed in eight female patients (body mass index [BMI] > 30) with early OA and 10 age-matched female controls (BMI < 30) at baseline (BL) and after 3, 6 and 12 months. Cartilage T2 maps, volume and average thickness were calculated in five compartments (medial/lateral femoral condyle, medial/lateral tibia and trochlea). These data were correlated with changes in clinical parameters and joint space width determined in standardized knee radiographs using a mixed random effects model.

Results

At BL, T2 was significantly higher (P < 0.05) across the cartilage in patients (45.68 ± 5.17 ms) compared to controls (41.75 ± 4.33 ms). Patients had significantly (P < 0.05) less cartilage volume and less average cartilage thickness in the tibia than controls (2.10 ± 0.53 cm3 vs 2.91 ± 0.49 cm3 and 1.59 ± 0.24 mm vs 1.90 ± 0.29 mm, respectively). A significant change in clinical parameters of OA, cartilage T2 values or a decrease of volume and average thickness could not be demonstrated within both groups.

Conclusion

Significant differences between the groups indicate that both T2 and morphometric parameters may be useful in quantifying early OA related changes. In a 12-month follow-up, however, no significant alterations of the studied parameters were found, which may be due to the length of the observation interval.

Key words

Osteoarthritis
Cartilage
Magnetic resonance imaging
T2 relaxation time
Volume
Follow-up

Cited by (0)