In vitro determination of biomechanical properties of human articular cartilage in osteoarthritis using multi-parametric MRI

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2008.11.019Get rights and content

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlations between MR parameters and the biomechanical properties of naturally degenerated human articular cartilage. Human cartilage explants from the femoral condyles of patients who underwent total knee replacement were evaluated on a micro-imaging system at 3 T. To quantify glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content, delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of the cartilage (dGEMRIC) was used. T2 maps were created by using multi-echo, multi-slice spin echo sequences with six echoes: 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 ms. Data for apparent diffusion constant (ADC) maps were obtained from pulsed gradient spin echo (PGSE) sequences with five b-values: 10.472, 220.0, 627.0, 452.8, 724.5, and 957.7. MR parameters were correlated with mechanical parameters (instantaneous (I) and equilibrium (Eq) modulus and relaxation time (τ)), and the OA stage of each cartilage specimen was determined by histological evaluation of hematoxylin–eosin stained slices. For some parameters, a high correlation was found: the correlation of T1Gd vs Eq (r = 0.8095), T1Gd vs I/Eq (r = −0.8441) and T1Gd vs τ (r = 0.8469). The correlation of T2 and ADC with selected biomechanical parameters was not statistically significant.

In conclusion, GAG content measured by dGEMRIC is highly related to the selected biomechanical properties of naturally degenerated articular cartilage. In contrast, T2 and ADC were unable to estimate these properties. The results of the study imply that some MR parameters can non-invasively predict the biomechanical properties of degenerated articular cartilage.

Introduction

The articular cartilage can be thought of as a fiber-reinforced anisotropic composite material. The mechanical properties of articular cartilage are a function of the essential mechanical properties of the tissue components and the interplay of these components during loading. Articular cartilage is a bi-phasic material: the permeable solid section is represented by a solid matrix that consists of collagen fibers and proteoglycan molecules, and the fluid section is composed of extracellular water with dissolved ions and nutrients. Most of the fluid can move through the collagen network during loading. Experimental data from articular cartilage can be assessed by single-, bi- or multi-phasic models [1], [2], [3], [4].

The mechanical properties of articular cartilage arise from the complex structure and interactions of its biochemical constituents: mostly water, electrolytes, and a solid matrix composed primarily of collagen and proteoglycan. Laasanen et al. showed that collagen primarily controls the dynamic tissue response while proteoglycans affect more the static properties [5]. In the ex-vivo study published by Appleyard et al. there was found a strong and significant correlation between shear modulus and collagen content, whereas correlation between shear modulus and water content was not significant [6]. Stiffness and strength of articular cartilage tissue depended on the density and orientation of collagen fibers, and the type or amount of collagen cross-linking [7].

Various imaging methods have been applied to assess articular cartilage. These include standard radiography [8], CT arthrography [9], ultrasonography [10], and MR imaging [11], [12]. MRI offers excellent soft tissue contrast and multi-planar imaging capability, and therefore, it has become the method of choice to diagnose cartilage diseases. It also provides valuable information on composition and structural changes in cartilage. For determination of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content, delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) was developed and has been used to answer clinical questions [13], [14]. Since transversal relaxation time, T2, is related to collagen matrix composition and is primarily influenced by collagen fiber orientation [15] and water content [16], T2 has been successfully used for in vitro [17] and in vivo [18], [19] cartilage tissue assessment. Another useful parameter that reflects the functional properties of cartilage tissue is diffusivity. The idea of using gradients to make the MR imaging signal sensitive to the molecular motion of water was introduced by Stejskal and Tanner in 1965 [20], and currently, there are a few sequences based on diffusion weighting that have been successfully used for evaluation of cartilage function and its structure [21], [22], [23], [24].

The mechanical properties of articular cartilage can be evaluated on different levels, from an in vivo investigation of intact joints by indentation [25] to in vitro studies of explants [26] and to cellular and molecular levels [26]. For viscoelastic materials like cartilage, two biomechanical parameters play a role: firstly the instantaneous modulus (I), which describes the initial stiffness upon loading, and secondly the equilibrium modulus (Eq) which describes only the time independent share of the stiffness. The ratio between I and Eq gives a measure of the viscoelastic character. If I/Eq is close to unity the material is merely elastic, and is better termed spontaneous elastic. If I/Eq is greater than two, the material is strongly viscoelastic. For cartilage it may be said that the smaller I/Eq the more vital is the cartilage, which means it is able to better withstand static loading (carrying heavy loads for instance) as well as fast and extremely high load cycles (from jumping or running for instance). The mechanical properties of cartilage tissue are strongly related to the OA stage of cartilage [27]. Changes in the biomechanical properties of articular cartilage are one of the first signs of the tissue degeneration. For cartilage degeneration, it is necessary to know how cartilage maintains its functionality and how cartilage responds to the ever-changing mechanical environment. The biomechanical properties of articular cartilage can be assessed relatively precisely, however, ex-vivo [28] or invasively during an arthroscopic procedure [29]. MRI provides the possibility to non-invasively assess the biomechanical properties of articular cartilage provides MRI. In the past, several studies suggested the way how MRI parameters might be used for biomechanical parameters assessment [28], [30], [31]. However, to the best of our knowledge, the correlation between biomechanical properties and MR parameters of degenerated human articular cartilage stages has not been previously determined.

Therefore, in the presented study we hypothesized that biochemical parameters derived non-invasively from MRI as a non-invasive imaging method can predict the biomechanical properties of naturally degenerated human articular cartilage. Thus the aim of this work was to determine the correlation of MR relaxation times and diffusion constants at 3 T with an instantaneous and an equilibrium modulus.

Section snippets

Sample preparation

Bone-cartilage specimens from patients who underwent total knee replacement surgery in an orthopedic hospital were delivered to our laboratory, several hours after surgery, in a frozen state. Thirteen specimens were harvested from the same site of the weight bearing area in lateral femoral condyles with different stages of osteoarthritis. Samples with extensively eroded cartilage tissue were excluded from the study. The size of the sample was chosen in order to fit into the micro-imaging device

Results

Histological evaluation revealed seven samples with mild OA, four with moderate OA and one with advanced OA.

In the comparison between mechanical properties and MRI parameters of cartilage samples in different OA stages a high correlation for some parameters was found, e.g., the correlation between I/Eq and bulk [Gd-DTPA] (r = 0.9320). In general, T1Gd and [Gd-DTPA] were in high correlation with the majority of the tested mechanical parameters, moreover, T1Gd correlated with Eq, I/Eq ratio and τ

Discussion

This study revealed a high correlation between some quantitative MR parameters (post-contrast T1 and contrast agent concentration) and biomechanical parameters (Eq, I/Eq, and τ) in naturally degenerated human articular cartilage.

It is generally accepted that the biomechanical properties of articular cartilage depend on the biochemical composition, the ultrastructural organization, and the interaction of the matrix molecules. Since alterations of the structural and biochemical properties are one

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Reinhard Fuiko for providing cartilage specimens. Funding for this study was provided by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) FWF—Project P-18110-B15 and Slovak Scientific Grant Agency VEGA 2/0142/08.

References (58)

  • V.C. Mow et al.

    Biphasic indentation of articular-cartilage.2. A numerical algorithm and an experimental-study

    Journal of Biomechanics

    (1989)
  • J.S. Jurvelin et al.

    Optical and mechanical determination of Poisson’s ratio of adult bovine humeral articular cartilage

    Journal of Biomechanics

    (1997)
  • M. Stolz et al.

    Dynamic elastic modulus of porcine articular cartilage determined at two different levels of tissue organization by indentation-type atomic force microscopy

    Biophysical Journal

    (2004)
  • M.J. Nissi et al.

    Estimation of mechanical properties of articular cartilage with MRI - dGEMRIC, T-2 and T-1 imaging in different species with variable stages of maturation

    Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

    (2007)
  • L.A. Setton et al.

    Altered mechanics of cartilage with osteoarthritis: human osteoarthritis and an experimental model of joint degeneration

    Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

    (1999)
  • V. Mlynarik et al.

    Investigation of laminar appearance of articular cartilage by means of magnetic resonance microscopy

    Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    (1996)
  • T.R. Nelson et al.

    Temperature-dependence of proton relaxation-times invitro

    Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    (1987)
  • V.C. Mow et al.

    Mechanics of animal joints

    Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics

    (1979)
  • V.C. Mow et al.

    Recent developments in synovial joint biomechanics

    Siam Review

    (1980)
  • M.S. Laasanen et al.

    Biomechanical properties of knee articular cartilage

    Biorheology

    (2003)
  • J.C. Bucklandwright

    Quantitative radiography of osteoarthritis

    Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

    (1994)
  • B.R. Daenen et al.

    Evaluation of patellar cartilage surface lesions: comparison of CT arthrography and fat-suppressed FLASH 3D MR imaging

    European Radiology

    (1998)
  • M.T. Nieminen et al.

    Quantitative MR microscopy of enzymatically degraded articular cartilage

    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

    (2000)
  • D. Burstein et al.

    Protocol issues for delayed Gd(DTPA)(2-)-enhanced MRI: (dGEMRIC) for clinical evaluation of articular cartilage

    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

    (2001)
  • S. Trattnig et al.

    Three-dimensional delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) for in vivo evaluation of reparative cartilage after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation at 3.0T: preliminary results

    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    (2007)
  • Y. Xia

    Magic-angle effect in magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage - A review

    Investigative Radiology

    (2000)
  • S. Lusse et al.

    Evaluation of water content by spatially resolved transverse relaxation times of human articular cartilage

    Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    (2000)
  • M. Uhl et al.

    Human articular cartilage: in vitro correlation of MRI and histologic findings

    European Radiology

    (1998)
  • G.H. Welsch et al.

    Cartilage T2 assessment at 3-T MR imaging: in vivo differentiation of normal hyaline cartilage from reparative tissue after two cartilage repair procedures - initial experience

    Radiology

    (2008)
  • Cited by (62)

    • Functional and structural properties of human patellar articular cartilage in osteoarthritis

      2021, Journal of Biomechanics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Previous studies with bovine and leporine articular cartilage have associated the OA-related changes in the constituent-specific mechanical parameters with structure and composition (Julkunen et al., 2009, 2007; Mäkelä et al., 2014). In humans, cartilage structure has been extensively evaluated using microscopy and magnetic resonance imaging, but the function is primarily characterized using only simple elastic properties of the tissue (Juras et al., 2009; Kaplan et al., 2017; Rautiainen et al., 2015; Robinson et al., 2016). Further, only a few studies have reported relationships between constituent-specific mechanical properties and tissue structure at different stages of osteoarthritis in humans (Ebrahimi et al., 2020, 2019; Julkunen et al., 2008; Kaplan et al., 2017; Mäkelä et al., 2012).

    • Bi-component T2 mapping correlates with articular cartilage material properties

      2021, Journal of Biomechanics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Correlation coefficients between MRI parameters and PG content were 0.73 to 0.82 for dGEMRIC (Tiel et al., 2016; Watanabe et al., 2006), −0.24 to −0.48 for T2 (Keenan et al., 2015; Li et al., 2011), and −0.04 to −0.64 for T1p (Keenan et al., 2011; Li et al., 2011; Tiel et al., 2016). Correlation coefficients between MRI parameters and elastic modulus were 0.81 for dGEMRIC (Juras et al., 2009), −0.16 for T1ρ (Keenan et al., 2011), and −0.09 to −0.47 for T2 (Juras et al., 2009; Keenan et al., 2011). One study reported a correlation coefficient of −0.32 between T1ρ and energy dissipation (Tang et al., 2011).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text