Pharmacology of TNF blockade in rheumatoid arthritis and other chronic inflammatory diseases

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2010.01.005Get rights and content

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF) has been unequivocally validated as a therapeutic target in a number of immune-mediated inflammatory disorders (IMIDs). There is now increasing choice of biologic agents within the class all of which successfully neutralize sTNF. But approaches to TNF inhibition differ and currently include mAbs (infliximab, adalimumab, and golimumab), either chimeric or human in sequence, a PEGylated Fab′ fragment (certolizumab), and an IgG1–TNFR2 fusion protein (etanercept). It is emerging that the pharmacological properties of these three anti-TNF subtypes differ with respect to Fc function, binding of tmTNF and the possible consequences of this, as well as the ability to form complexes. The mode of administration of each agent, clearance and the local tissue concentrations achieved may also confer unique characteristics of relevance with respect to efficacy and safety.

Introduction

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF) is a pleiotropic cytokine with both proinflammatory and immunoregulatory functions. The diverse activities are mediated via ligand interaction with two distinct receptors, p55/TNFRI and p75/TNFRII expressed on most human cells, which activate separate transduction pathways resulting in distinct biologic effects. TNF is a validated therapeutic target in a number of chronic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and psoriasis with or without complicating arthritis. It was the first cytokine to be fully validated as a therapeutic target for the treatment of RA through a series of preclinical studies of the immunobiology of synovial tissue harvested from patients with active disease, preclinical animal model studies, and human trials [1]. TNF is expressed as a transmembrane precursor (tmTNF) that undergoes proteolytic processing to form a soluble homotrimer. The binding of both the membrane-bound and soluble forms of TNF (sTNF) to its receptors induces production of several other proinflammatory cytokines, cell adhesion molecules, and other inflammatory molecules.

Three TNF-specific monoclonal antibodies, infliximab (Remicade®), adalimumab (Humira®), and golimumab (Simponi®) have been approved for patient use (Figure 1). In addition, the TNF-specific, PEGylated Fab′ antibody fragment certolizumab pegol (Cimzia®) has also been approved for clinical use (Figure 1). The Fab′ fragment was engineered with a single hinge region free-cysteine residue which enables site-specific attachment of polyethylene glycol (PEG) without affecting the ability of the Fab′ fragment to bind and neutralize TNF. The attachment of a 40 kDa PEG moiety to the Fab′ fragment markedly increases the half-life of certolizumab to one comparable with that of a whole antibody product. Another anti-TNF biologic therapy, etanercept (Enbrel®), is a fusion protein of two TNFR2 receptor extracellular domains and the Fc portion of human IgG (Figure 1), and this agent has also been approved for the treatment of several IMIDs.

Although all these biologics have TNF as a defined target, some differences in clinical effectiveness of the agents across the range of IMIDs in which TNF is implicated has been noted, etanercept, for example, lacking efficacy in IBD. Such observations suggest that neutralization of soluble TNF may not be the only mechanism of action of these agents and have led to questions regarding differences in the pharmacology and mechanisms of action of these biologic approaches to TNF inhibition.

Section snippets

Specificity and potency for neutralization of TNF

Etanercept is unique among the five TNF antagonists in binding members of the lymphotoxin (LT) family, namely soluble LTα3 and cell surface LTα2β1. Because LTα3 exerts its biologic activities through TNFR1 and TNFR2, etanercept neutralizes LTα3 and sTNF with similar potency [2, 3] and a possible consequence of this competition is that not all TNF will be fully neutralized if LTα3 concentrations are similar to or greater than etanercept concentrations in a tissue. Another potential consequence

Mode of administration

A loading dose, as given with certolizumab and infliximab, or intravenous administration as in the case of infliximab, might account for relatively rapid onset of action within the drug class. Furthermore, by achieving high blood concentrations following intravenous infusion, infliximab may reach higher concentrations in inflamed tissue microenvironments and may therefore have a greater opportunity to bind to tmTNF on cells and induce reverse signaling or FcR-mediated effects, as will be

Antibiologic antibodies

The clinical response to infliximab and adalimumab in RA and IBD closely follows the trough drug levels [5•, 6•] and the presence of antibodies directed against the drugs [5]. The duration of response to repeated biologic administration of infliximab is also inversely related to the production of human antichimeric antibodies. Higher doses of infliximab are less immunogenic than lower doses and in RA, concomitant methotrexate administration further reduces the occurrence of human antichimeric

Biologic structure and effects of the Fc

In the case of certolizumab pegol, the effect of PEGylation on the distribution of anti-TNF biologics to inflamed tissues has been investigated using a noninvasive biofluorescence labeling methodology in murine arthritis [12]. Certolizumab pegol, adalimumab, and infliximab all distributed more effectively into inflamed tissue than noninflamed tissue but the ratio of certolizumab pegol penetration into arthritic paws compared with normal tissue was greater than that observed with adalimumab and

Biologic-TNF complex formation

The mAbs adalimumab, infliximab, and golimumab are all bivalent with specificity for the monomeric subunit of homotrimeric TNF whereas certolizumab is univalent for the same ligand. Therefore, a single sTNF or tmTNF molecule can potentially be bound by up to three different anti-TNF molecules (Figure 2). Furthermore, a bivalent mAb may bind two monomeric TNF subunits within the homotrimer or crosslink two TNF homotrimers which could both be sTNF, tmTNF or even one of each type. [19]. By

TmTNF and reverse signaling

All five anti-TNFs currently available have in common the capability to effectively neutralize sTNF as a major pharmacological mechanism of action. However, there are distinctions with respect to the effect of engagement with tmTNF. In all cases, anti-TNF biologics can act as antagonists by blocking interaction between tmTNF and TNFRI/II expressed on a responsive cell. A recent study reported the abilities of certolizumab pegol, adalimumab, and infliximab to neutralize mTNF-mediated signaling

Apoptosis

Successful treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases with TNF antagonists is associated with rapid reduction in cellularity at the site of inflammation. However, the relative contributions of biologic-induced apoptosis, cytotoxicity, and modulation of inflammatory cell trafficking remain unclear. TNF antagonists might potentially induce macrophage or lymphocyte apoptosis by two mechanisms. Firstly, by neutralizing sTNF a biologic-TNF inhibitor may deprive cells of survival signals

Differential efficacy and toxicity and the biology of granulomatous conditions

In the absence of head to head trials between anti-TNF biologics, whether any observed differences might be attributable to distinct mechanisms of action, tissue distribution, loading dose and Cmax, or to other pharmacologically distinct properties of each agent, or simply to variability in the patient cohorts recruited to clinical trial remains a matter of some conjecture. However, some differences appear to be present. For example, adalimumab, infliximab, and etanercept are all effective

Conclusions

Blockade of TNF has proved a highly successful therapeutic intervention in the treatment of certain IMIDs. There are currently five biologic therapies within this class and more are anticipated. The most notable distinction with respect to efficacy and safety is that etanercept is not efficacious in inflammatory bowel disease, and has a lower association with TB reactivation than the mAbs. This suggests that neutralization of sTNF is not the only pharmacological mechanism of action of

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

References (59)

  • T.J. Smeets et al.

    Tumor necrosis factor alpha blockade reduces the synovial cell infiltrate early after initiation of treatment, but apparently not by induction of apoptosis in synovial tissue

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2003)
  • R. Malaviya et al.

    Induction of lesional and circulating leukocyte apoptosis by infliximab in a patient with moderate to severe psoriasis

    J Drugs Dermatol

    (2006)
  • Etanercept plus standard therapy for Wegener's granulomatosis

    N Engl J Med

    (2005)
  • M.D. Rossman et al.

    A double-blind, randomized-controlled trial of infliximab in subjects with active pulmonary sarcoidosis

    Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis

    (2006)
  • A. Reiff et al.

    Etanercept therapy in children with treatment-resistant uveitis

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2001)
  • P.C. Taylor et al.

    Anti-TNF biologic agents: still the therapy of choice for RA

    Nat Rheumatol Rev

    (2009)
  • J.H. Anolik et al.

    Cutting edge: anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in rheumatoid arthritis inhibits memory B lymphocytes via effects on lymphoid germinal centers and follicular dendritic cell networks

    J Immunol

    (2008)
  • T.R. Radstake et al.

    Formation of antibodies against infliximab and adalimumab strongly correlates with functional drug levels and clinical responses in rheumatoid arthritis

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2009)
  • C.H. Seow et al.

    Trough serum infliximab: a predictive factor of clinical outcome for infliximab treatment in acute ulcerative colitis

    Gut

    (2010)
  • R.N. Maini et al.

    Therapeutic efficacy of multiple intravenous infusions of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody combined with low-dose weekly methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis

    Arthritis Rheum

    (1998)
  • Aikawa EN, de Carvalho JF, Artur Almeida Silva C, Bonfá E: Immunogenicity of anti-TNF-alpha agents in autoimmune...
  • M.K. de Vries et al.

    Immunogenicity does not influence treatment with etanercept in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2009)
  • Bartelds GM, Wijbrandts CA, Nurmohamed MT, Stapel SO, Lems WF, Aarden L, Dijkmans BA, Tak PP, Wolbink GJ:...
  • G.M. Bartelds et al.

    Anti-adalimumab antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis patients are associated with interleukin-10 gene polymorphisms

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2009)
  • R. Palframan et al.

    Use of biofluorescence imaging to compare the distribution of certolizumab pegol, adalimumab, and infliximab in the inflamed paws of mice with collagen-induced arthritis

    J Immunol Methods

    (2009)
  • Z. Tutuncu et al.

    Fcgamma receptor type IIIA polymorphisms influence treatment outcomes in patients with inflammatory arthritis treated with tumor necrosis factor alpha-blocking agents

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2005)
  • T. Kohno et al.

    Binding characteristics of tumor necrosis factor receptor–Fc fusion proteins vs anti-tumor necrosis factor mAbs

    J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc

    (2007)
  • A. Nesbitt et al.

    Mechanism of action of certolizumab pegol (CDP870): in vitro comparison with other anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agents

    Inflamm Bowel Dis

    (2007)
  • J.M. Van den Brande et al.

    Infliximab but not etanercept induces apoptosis in lamina propria T-lymphocytes from patients with Crohn's disease

    Gastroenterology

    (2003)
  • Cited by (126)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text