Original articleA Comparison of Fatigue Scales in Postpoliomyelitis Syndrome
Section snippets
Research Participants
We conducted this study under a protocol approved by the local institutional review board. Following the subject’s consent, we carried out a detailed clinical evaluation to confirm the diagnosis of PPS, to discern the presence or absence of disabling fatigue, and to exclude confounders. We ascertained PPS according to a slightly modified version of the diagnostic criteria recommended by the International March of Dimes16: (1) unequivocal remote history of paralytic poliomyelitis followed by
Results
In total, 56 patients (22 men, 34 women) were recruited as part of a larger outpatient study in a metropolitan area. Age varied from 31 to 88 years (median, 59y; mean, 59.9y). Of the 56 patients, 39 fulfilled the adopted diagnostic criteria for PPS, and 25 of the 39 also had disabling fatigue according to definition. Mean age at acute poliovirus infection was 6.4 years, (median, 5y; range, 9mo to 23y). Time from acute infection to maximal recovery was 1 to 26 years (median, 4y; mean, 7y). Among
Discussion
As shown, FSS was the strongest predictor of severe fatigue in the study sample. Our results indicated that scores on the FSS most closely agreed with the intensity of self-reported fatigue. All but 1 patient meeting the definition for disabling fatigue scored 50% or higher on the scale range for FSS. Our finding, however, should be taken with caution because of the strong resemblance between 2 of the 3 statements characterizing disabling fatigue and items 7 and 8 on the FSS form. The
Conclusions
In patients with PPS, fatigue is an incapacitating symptom for which a plethora of conventional pharmacologic therapies have been tested and failed. A major road block in clinical research in PPS continues to be the lack of specific and sensitive measure tools. Among the traditional questionnaires tested in this investigation, the FSS seemed to be the most informative for the clinical assessment of PPS patients suffering from fatigue. However, the adequacy of FSS for longitudinal monitoring of
Acknowledgments
The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the U.S. Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.
References (26)
- et al.
Parallels between post-polio fatigue and chronic fatigue syndromea common pathophysiology?
Am J Med
(1998) - et al.
A comparison of 4 questionnaires to measure fatigue in postpoliomyelitis syndrome
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2004) - et al.
Fatigue secondary to chronic illnesspostpolio syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome, and multiple sclerosis
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(1994) A case of progressive muscular atrophy occurring in a man who had acute poliomyelitis nineteen years previously with a review of the literature bearing upon the relations of infantile spinal paralysis to the spinal disease of later life
Univ Pa Med Bull
(1903)Fatigue and multiple sclerosisevidence-based management strategies for fatigue in multiple sclerosis
(1998)- et al.
Administration of recombinant human leukocyte alpha 2-interferon in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Arch Neurol
(1986) Post-polio fatigue treated with amantadine [letter]
Arch Neurol
(1991)- et al.
Postpolio syndrome—response to deprenyl (selegiline)
Int J Neurosci
(1993) - et al.
A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of amantadine for the treatment of fatigue in patients with the post-polio syndrome
Ann N Y Acad Sci
(1995) - et al.
An open trial of pyridostigmine in post-poliomyelitis syndrome
Can J Neurol Sci
(1995)
Effect of human growth hormone on muscle function in post-polio syndrome
Ann N Y Acad Sci
A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of high-dose prednisone for the treatment of post-poliomyelitis syndrome
Ann N Y Acad Sci
Bromocriptine in the treatment of post-polio fatiguea pilot study with implications for the pathophysiology of fatigue
Am J Phys Med Rehabil
Cited by (32)
Approach to Fatigue and Energy Conservation
2021, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :The smallest detectable change was 1.5 for the FSS, 2.0 for the PPL fatigue item, and 1.9 for the SFQ. Vasconcelos and colleagues17 compared the FFS, Fatigue Impact Scale, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for fatigue in 56 subjects with 39 of those fitting the criteria for PPS. Of the 3 scales, the FSS was the strongest predictor of severe fatigue with moderate correlation to the VAS.
A randomized controlled trial of coenzyme Q<inf>10</inf> for fatigue in the late-onset sequelae of poliomyelitis
2015, Complementary Therapies in MedicineCitation Excerpt :The FSS comprises nine items in a seven-point scale with higher scores in the range of 1–7 indicating higher levels of fatigue.14 Vasconcelos et al.18 compared the applicability and validity of the FSS, visual analog scale and the fatigue impact scale for the measurement of fatigue in PPS and concluded that the FSS was the strongest predictor of severe fatigue and most closely agreed with the intensity of self-reported fatigue in PPS. Since then, Rasch analysis has confirmed the validity of eight of the nine items of the FSS (the exception being item 1 on motivation) as a measure of the severity and impact of physical symptoms of fatigue in polio survivors.19
Fatigue in advanced kidney disease
2014, Kidney InternationalCitation Excerpt :The intensity of fatigue is measured in millimeters from the low (left) end of the scale with, again, a higher score indicating an increased level of fatigue. Studies have suggested that the descriptiveness of the visual analog scale to evaluate fatigue severity is considerably lower compared with other measures.23 Furthermore, the scale might fail to differentiate between sleepiness and fatigue.24
Comparison of delayed versus immediate pushing during second stage of labor for nulliparous women with epidural anesthesia
2010, JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal NursingCitation Excerpt :VAS are commonly used measurement tools for quantifying a participant's perception of symptoms, such as pain, dyspnea, nausea, and fatigue, in research studies. Use of the VAS for symptom measurement has been extensively studied for pain measurement and fatigue in a variety of patient populations and situations, and the scale has been found to be a valid and reliable measure for symptom perception (Anton, Miller, & Townson, 2008; Bausewein, Booth, & Higginson, 2008; Bijur, Silver, & Gallagher, 2001; Bricker & Lavendre, 2002; Good et al., 2001; Hewlett, Hehir, & Kirwan, 2007; Mattsson, Möller, Lundberg, Gard, & Boström, 2008; Mayberry et al., 1999a; Myles & Urquhart, 2005; Vasconcelos et al., 2006; Winkelman, Norman, Maloni, & Kless, 2008). Documentation of the onset of the second stage of labor, onset of active pushing, and delivery times were recorded at the time of occurrence in the computerized, medical record documentation system, and on the data collection sheet.
Aging and sequelae of poliomyelitis
2010, Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation MedicineMeasuring Fatigue in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury
2008, Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationCitation Excerpt :The VAS-F is a simple 1-item question of self-reported fatigue similar to a VAS for pain. Variants of the VAS-F have been widely used in fatigue research and practice.5,15,28 We used a VAS-F with anchors of “no fatigue” and “extreme fatigue.”
Supported by the Department of Defense (Health Affairs grant no. MDA 905-01-007).
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.