Original article
A Comparison of Fatigue Scales in Postpoliomyelitis Syndrome

Presented in part to the American Academy of Neurology, April 2005, Miami, FL.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.06.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Vasconcelos Jr OM, Prokhorenko OA, Kelley KF, Vo AH, Olsen CH, Dalakas MC, Halstead LS, Jabbari B, Campbell WW. A comparison of fatigue scales in postpoliomyelitis syndrome.

Objective

To examine the applicability and validity of traditional fatigue questionnaires in postpoliomyelitis syndrome (PPS) patients with disabling fatigue.

Design

Cross-sectional study. PPS and disabling fatigue were ascertained according to published criteria. Descriptiveness was determined using the McNemar test, and interscale z-score agreement was estimated with Pearson’s coefficients.

Setting

PPS clinic.

Participants

Fifty-six survivors of poliomyelitis: 39 met criteria for PPS, 25 of whom met criteria for disabling fatigue.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), visual analog scale (VAS) for fatigue, and Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS).

Results

Twenty-four patients scored 50% or higher on the scale range for FSS, compared with 19 patients for VAS for fatigue (P=.042), and 7 patients for FIS (P<.001). Scores for patients with disabling fatigue averaged 81.5%, 62%, and 40.9% of the scale range for FSS, VAS for fatigue, and FIS, respectively. Agreement was moderate between the FSS and VAS for fatigue (r=.45, P=.02), but low between FSS and FIS (r=.29, P=.15), and FIS and VAS for fatigue (r=.20, P=.33). Two sample t tests showed significant differences between those with disabling fatigue and those without, based on FSS scores (t=3.8, P<.001), but not for VAS for fatigue or FIS scores.

Conclusions

FSS was the most descriptive of the instruments tested. Scores generated by the scales were not interchangeable. Of the 3 scales, FFS seemed to be the most informative for the clinical assessment of fatigue in patients with PPS.

Section snippets

Research Participants

We conducted this study under a protocol approved by the local institutional review board. Following the subject’s consent, we carried out a detailed clinical evaluation to confirm the diagnosis of PPS, to discern the presence or absence of disabling fatigue, and to exclude confounders. We ascertained PPS according to a slightly modified version of the diagnostic criteria recommended by the International March of Dimes16: (1) unequivocal remote history of paralytic poliomyelitis followed by

Results

In total, 56 patients (22 men, 34 women) were recruited as part of a larger outpatient study in a metropolitan area. Age varied from 31 to 88 years (median, 59y; mean, 59.9y). Of the 56 patients, 39 fulfilled the adopted diagnostic criteria for PPS, and 25 of the 39 also had disabling fatigue according to definition. Mean age at acute poliovirus infection was 6.4 years, (median, 5y; range, 9mo to 23y). Time from acute infection to maximal recovery was 1 to 26 years (median, 4y; mean, 7y). Among

Discussion

As shown, FSS was the strongest predictor of severe fatigue in the study sample. Our results indicated that scores on the FSS most closely agreed with the intensity of self-reported fatigue. All but 1 patient meeting the definition for disabling fatigue scored 50% or higher on the scale range for FSS. Our finding, however, should be taken with caution because of the strong resemblance between 2 of the 3 statements characterizing disabling fatigue and items 7 and 8 on the FSS form. The

Conclusions

In patients with PPS, fatigue is an incapacitating symptom for which a plethora of conventional pharmacologic therapies have been tested and failed. A major road block in clinical research in PPS continues to be the lack of specific and sensitive measure tools. Among the traditional questionnaires tested in this investigation, the FSS seemed to be the most informative for the clinical assessment of PPS patients suffering from fatigue. However, the adequacy of FSS for longitudinal monitoring of

Acknowledgments

The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the U.S. Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.

References (26)

  • K.R. Shetty et al.

    Effect of human growth hormone on muscle function in post-polio syndrome

    Ann N Y Acad Sci

    (1995)
  • S. Dinsmore et al.

    A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of high-dose prednisone for the treatment of post-poliomyelitis syndrome

    Ann N Y Acad Sci

    (1995)
  • R.L. Bruno et al.

    Bromocriptine in the treatment of post-polio fatiguea pilot study with implications for the pathophysiology of fatigue

    Am J Phys Med Rehabil

    (1996)
  • Cited by (32)

    • Approach to Fatigue and Energy Conservation

      2021, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      The smallest detectable change was 1.5 for the FSS, 2.0 for the PPL fatigue item, and 1.9 for the SFQ. Vasconcelos and colleagues17 compared the FFS, Fatigue Impact Scale, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for fatigue in 56 subjects with 39 of those fitting the criteria for PPS. Of the 3 scales, the FSS was the strongest predictor of severe fatigue with moderate correlation to the VAS.

    • A randomized controlled trial of coenzyme Q<inf>10</inf> for fatigue in the late-onset sequelae of poliomyelitis

      2015, Complementary Therapies in Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      The FSS comprises nine items in a seven-point scale with higher scores in the range of 1–7 indicating higher levels of fatigue.14 Vasconcelos et al.18 compared the applicability and validity of the FSS, visual analog scale and the fatigue impact scale for the measurement of fatigue in PPS and concluded that the FSS was the strongest predictor of severe fatigue and most closely agreed with the intensity of self-reported fatigue in PPS. Since then, Rasch analysis has confirmed the validity of eight of the nine items of the FSS (the exception being item 1 on motivation) as a measure of the severity and impact of physical symptoms of fatigue in polio survivors.19

    • Fatigue in advanced kidney disease

      2014, Kidney International
      Citation Excerpt :

      The intensity of fatigue is measured in millimeters from the low (left) end of the scale with, again, a higher score indicating an increased level of fatigue. Studies have suggested that the descriptiveness of the visual analog scale to evaluate fatigue severity is considerably lower compared with other measures.23 Furthermore, the scale might fail to differentiate between sleepiness and fatigue.24

    • Comparison of delayed versus immediate pushing during second stage of labor for nulliparous women with epidural anesthesia

      2010, JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing
      Citation Excerpt :

      VAS are commonly used measurement tools for quantifying a participant's perception of symptoms, such as pain, dyspnea, nausea, and fatigue, in research studies. Use of the VAS for symptom measurement has been extensively studied for pain measurement and fatigue in a variety of patient populations and situations, and the scale has been found to be a valid and reliable measure for symptom perception (Anton, Miller, & Townson, 2008; Bausewein, Booth, & Higginson, 2008; Bijur, Silver, & Gallagher, 2001; Bricker & Lavendre, 2002; Good et al., 2001; Hewlett, Hehir, & Kirwan, 2007; Mattsson, Möller, Lundberg, Gard, & Boström, 2008; Mayberry et al., 1999a; Myles & Urquhart, 2005; Vasconcelos et al., 2006; Winkelman, Norman, Maloni, & Kless, 2008). Documentation of the onset of the second stage of labor, onset of active pushing, and delivery times were recorded at the time of occurrence in the computerized, medical record documentation system, and on the data collection sheet.

    • Aging and sequelae of poliomyelitis

      2010, Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
    • Measuring Fatigue in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury

      2008, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Citation Excerpt :

      The VAS-F is a simple 1-item question of self-reported fatigue similar to a VAS for pain. Variants of the VAS-F have been widely used in fatigue research and practice.5,15,28 We used a VAS-F with anchors of “no fatigue” and “extreme fatigue.”

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by the Department of Defense (Health Affairs grant no. MDA 905-01-007).

    No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.

    View full text