Effects of pilocarpine on salivary flow in patients with Sjo¨gren's syndrome

https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(91)90491-TGet rights and content

Abstract

Pilocarpine, a muscarinic-cholinergic agonist drug, has been reported to stimulate salivary flow in patients with salivary gland dysfunction. Previous studies involved heterogenous groups of patients with salivary gland dysfunction and examined the short-term, single-dose, tablet form of pilocarpine. In this single-blind, placebo-controlled study we examined the long-term effects of pilocarpine administration on patients with definitively diagnosed Sjo¨gren's syndrome (SS). Nine subjects with SS who received pilocarpine, and nine age- and sex-matched SS control subjects who received a placebo, participated. Baseline predosing sialometric and clinical data were obtained for all subjects. The study group used 2% pilocarpine as a liquid ophthalmic drop preparation, four drops three times per day, for 6-weeks. Identically appearing placebo solution with the same dosing schedule and duration was used for the control subjects. Sialometric and clinical examinations were performed. The results indicated a significant overall increase in both whole unstimulated salivary flow (0.15 ± 0.03 ml/min in study subjects vs 0.02 ± 0.001 ml/min in control subjects;p < 0.001) and parotid stimulated salivary flow (0.14 ± 0.04 ml/min in study subjects vs 0.009 ± 0.002 ml/min in control subjects;p < 0.001) in the pilocarpine group as compared with the placebo group. The results of this study support the use of pilocarpine to increase salivary flow in patients with SS.

Reference (15)

  • Hensten-PettersenA

    Biological activities in human labial and palatine secretions

    Arch Oral Biol

    (1975)
  • ChisholmDM et al.

    Labial salivary gland biopsy in Sjo¨gren's disease

    J Clin Pathol

    (1968)
  • DanielsTE et al.

    The oral component of Sjo¨gren's syndrome

    J Oral Surg

    (1976)
  • CummingsHA

    Sjo¨gren's syndrome: newer aspects of research, diagnosis, and therapy

    Ann Intern Med

    (1971)
  • MoutsopoulosHM

    Sjo¨gren's syndrome: current issues—part I

    Ann Intern Med

    (1980)
  • RhodusNL

    Detection and management of the dental patient with Sjo¨gren's syndrome

    Comp Cont Ed Dent

    (1986)
  • GorlinRJ
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (59)

  • Engineering the mode of morphogenetic signal presentation to promote branching from salivary gland spheroids in 3D hydrogels

    2020, Acta Biomaterialia
    Citation Excerpt :

    On the other hand, late xerostomia is caused by gland fibrosis, is permanent and can occur up to one year after the radiation treatment [6,7]. Another cause of xerostomia is Sjögren Syndrome (SS), an autoimmune disease where the host immune cells target exocrine glands leading to hyposalivation [6,8,9]. Together, radiation therapy and SS cause loss in saliva quality and quantity that significantly decreases the quality of life of millions of patients.

  • Exploratory study on reduction of the incidence of hyperhidrosis by oral pilocarpine

    2014, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medicine, and Pathology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Xerostomia associated with Sjögren's syndrome is treated effectively with cevimeline hydrochloride hydrate and oral pilocarpine [1–6].

  • Management of xerostomia and other complications of Sjögren's syndrome

    2014, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America
    Citation Excerpt :

    Briefly, studies were assessed for risk of bias, inconsistency of the direction of results across studies, precision of effect estimates, use of surrogate outcomes (indirectness), and publication bias (available at: http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/index.htm) (Table 2). Extensive literature has been published focusing on the effect of therapeutic interventions for the management of xerostomia and reduced salivary flow in SS: 43 studies included assessment of changes in perception of oral dryness or salivary flow1–3,7–46; 37 had sialometry as a primary or secondary outcome; 15 studies included randomization across groups in their study design (Table 3)1,14,16,17,19,20,24,26,27,30,31,36,37,39,45; and 5 studies included a crossover design with different washout periods.8,9,15,17,22 Additional study designs that addressed xerostomia or hypofunction were pilot short-term trials, safety trials, placebo-controlled (not randomized) trials, and quasiexperimental observational designs.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text