Original article
A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function

https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90080-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Many controlled trials rely on subjective measures of symptoms or quality of life as primary outcomes. The relative merits of different response options for these measures is an important, but largely unexplored, issue. Therefore, we compared the responsiveness of seven-point Likert vs visual analogue scales (VAS) in a questionnaire measuring quality of life in chronic lung disease.

The VAS and seven-point scale versions of the questionnaire were administered to 28 patients before and after completing an inpatient respiratory rehabilitation program of known benefit. For all four dimensions of the questionnaire (dyspnea, fatigue, emotional function, and mastery) the VAS showed a larger improvement than the seven-point scale when both were standardized on a scale of 0–10. However, in each case the variability of the improvement was greater using the VAS. The difference in improvement between the two scales was not statistically significant.

We conclude that the two methods of presenting response options show comparable responsiveness. The ease of administration and interpretation of the seven-point scale recommend its use in clinical trials.

References (33)

  • JR Masters

    The relationship between number of response categories and reliability of Likert-type questionnaires

    J Educ Meas

    (1974)
  • SJ McKelvie

    Graphic rating scales—How many categories?

    Br J Psychol

    (1978)
  • AW Bendig

    The reliability of self-ratings as a function of the amount of verbal anchoring and of the number of categories on the scale

    J Appl Psychol

    (1953)
  • RH Finn

    Effects of some variations in rating scale characteristics of the means and reliabilities of ratings

    Educ Psychol Meas

    (1972)
  • L Neumann et al.

    Comparison of six lengths of rating scales: students' attitudes toward instruction

    Psychol Bull

    (1981)
  • K Sriwatanakul et al.

    Studies with different types of visual analogue scales for measurement of pain

    Clin Pharmac Ther

    (1983)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text