EULAR recommendations for the management of AAV—2022 update
LoE | SoR | FV (%) | LoA (0–10) | ||
Overarching principles | |||||
A | Patients with AAV should be offered best care which must be based on shared decision-making between the patient and the physician considering efficacy, safety and costs. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 9.6±0.5 |
B | Patients with AAV should have access to education focusing on the impact of AAV and its prognosis, key warning symptoms and treatment (including treatment-related complications). | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 9.8±0.6 |
C | Patients with AAV should be periodically screened for treatment-related adverse effects and comorbidities. We recommend prophylaxis and lifestyle advice to reduce treatment-related complications and other comorbidities. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 9.8±0.6 |
D | AAV are rare, heterogeneous, and potentially life-threatening and organ-threatening diseases and thus require multidisciplinary management by centres with, or with ready access to, expertise in vasculitis. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 9.8±0.5 |
Recommendations | |||||
1 | A positive biopsy is strongly supportive of a diagnosis of vasculitis and we recommend biopsies to assist in establishing a new diagnosis of AAV and for further evaluation of patients suspected of having relapsing vasculitis. | 3b | C | 90 | 8.7±1.9 |
2 | In patients with signs and/or symptoms raising suspicion of a diagnosis of AAV, we recommend testing for both PR3-ANCA and MPO-ANCA using a high-quality antigen-specific assay as the primary method of testing. | 1a | A | 100 | 10.0±0 |
3 | For induction of remission in patients with new-onset or relapsing GPA or MPA with organ-threatening or life-threatening disease, we recommend treatment with a combination of glucocorticoids and either rituximab or cyclophosphamide.* Rituximab is preferred in relapsing disease.† | 1a* | A* | 100 | 9.6±0.8 |
2b† | B† | ||||
4 | For induction of remission of non-organ-threatening or non-life-threatening GPA or MPA, treatment with a combination of glucocorticoids and rituximab is recommended. Methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil can be considered as alternatives to rituximab. | 1b | B | 90 | 9.2±0.8 |
5 | As part of regimens for induction of remission in GPA or MPA, we recommend treatment with oral glucocorticoids at a starting dose of 50–75 mg prednisolone equivalent/day, depending on body weight. We recommend stepwise reduction in glucocorticoids according to table 4 and achieving a dose of 5 mg prednisolone equivalent per day by 4–5 months. | 1b | A | 100 | 9.4±0.8 |
6 | Avacopan in combination with rituximab or cyclophosphamide may be considered for induction of remission in GPA or MPA, as part of a strategy to substantially reduce exposure to glucocorticoids. | 1b | B | 100 | 9.0±0.9 |
7 | Plasma exchange may be considered as part of therapy to induce remission in GPA or MPA for those with a serum creatinine >300 µmol/L due to active glomerulonephritis.* | 1a* | B* | 95* | 8.0±1.7 |
Routine use of plasma exchange to treat alveolar haemorrhage in GPA and MPA is not recommended.† | 1b† | B† | 90† | 8.8±1.3 | |
8 | For patients with GPA or MPA with disease refractory to therapy to induce remission, we recommend a thorough reassessment of disease status and comorbidities and consideration of options for additional or different treatment. These patients should be managed in close conjunction with, or referred to, a centre with expertise in vasculitis. | 5 | D | 100 | 9.9±0.5 |
9 | For maintenance of remission of GPA and MPA, after induction of remission with either rituximab or cyclophosphamide, we recommend treatment with rituximab. Azathioprine or methotrexate may be considered as alternatives. | 1b | A | 100 | 9.3±1.0 |
10 | We recommend that therapy to maintain remission for GPA and MPA be continued for 24–48 months following induction of remission of new-onset disease.* Longer duration of therapy should be considered in relapsing patients or those with an increased risk of relapse, but should be balanced against patient preferences and risks of continuing immunosuppression.† | 1a* | B | 100 | 9.1±1.4 |
4† | D | ||||
11 | For induction of remission in new-onset or relapsing EGPA with organ-threatening or life-threatening manifestations, we recommend treatment with a combination of high-dose glucocorticoids and cyclophosphamide. A combination of high-dose glucocorticoids and rituximab may be considered as an alternative. | 2b | B | 100 | 9.6±0.8 |
12 | For induction of remission in new-onset or relapsing EGPA without organ-threatening or life-threatening manifestations, we recommend treatment with glucocorticoids. | 2b | B | 95 | 9.3±0.9 |
13 | For induction of remission in patients with relapsing or refractory EGPA without active organ-threatening or life-threatening disease, we recommend the use of mepolizumab. | 1b | B | 70 | 8.9±1.3 |
14 | For maintenance of remission of EGPA after induction of remission for organ-threatening or life-threatening disease, treatment with either methotrexate†, azathioprine‡, mepolizumab‡ or rituximab‡ should be considered | 2b† | B | 85 | 8.8±1.5 |
4‡ | C | ||||
For maintenance of remission of relapsing EGPA after induction of remission for non-organ-threatening or life-threatening manifestations at the time of relapse, we recommend treatment with mepolizumab.* | 1b* | A | |||
15 | In the management of patients with AAV, we recommend that structured clinical assessment, rather than ANCA and/or CD19+ B cell testing alone, should inform decisions on changes in treatment. | 1b | B | 95 | 9.3±1.1 |
16 | In patients with AAV receiving rituximab, we recommend measurement of serum immunoglobulin concentrations prior to each course of rituximab to detect secondary immunodeficiency. | 1b | B | 100 | 9.2±1.4 |
17 | For patients with AAV receiving rituximab, cyclophosphamide and/or high doses of glucocorticoids, we recommend the use of trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole as prophylaxis against Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia and other infections. | 3b | B | 100 | 9.5±1.1 |
The LoE was determined for different parts of each recommendation (referred to with different signs such as * or †). The level of agreement was computed on a 0–10 scale.
AAV, ANCA-associated vasculitis; ANCA, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody; EGPA, eosinophilic GPA; FV, final vote (% of expert panel members who agreed with the recommendation); GPA, granulomatosis with polyangiitis; LoA, level of agreement on a scale of 0–10; LoE, level of evidence; MPA, microscopic polyangiitis; MPO, myeloperoxidase; n.a., not applicable; PR3, proteinase 3; SoR, strength of recommendation.