Overarching principles and points to consider for the measurement and reporting of IFN-I pathway assays in clinical research and practice
Level of evidence | Level of agreement (mean±SD), n (%) scorings ≥8/10 | |
Overarching principles | ||
A.The IFN pathway is a complex system with multiple subtypes of IFNs and diverse downstream effects on gene and protein expression. | N/A | 9.76±0.66 17 (100) |
B. IFN-I pathway activation is a common hallmark in many RMDs. Although IFN-I pathway activation is associated with some clinical manifestations, the utility of IFN-I pathway assays in clinical practice requires further validation for most contexts. | N/A | 9.29±0.98 16 (94.1) |
Points to consider | ||
1. Task force consensus terminology should be considered for reporting IFN assays measurement. | 5 | 9.58±0.79 17 (100) |
2. Existing assays measure different aspects of the IFN-I pathway; they do not reflect the entirety of the pathway and some are not specific for IFN-I. The most appropriate assay will depend on the research or clinical question and should be justified. | 4 | 9.76±0.56 17 (100) |
3. Publications on novel IFN-I pathway assays should report whether they specifically reflect IFN-I, and to the extent possible, which IFN-I is measured. | 5 | 9.58±0.61 17 (100) |
4. For assays that evaluate pathways downstream of the IFN-I receptor (eg, IFN-stimulated gene expression or protein scores) the choice of components needs to be justified. For gene expression scores, the known subsets of IFN-stimulated genes should be described separately. | 5 | 9.41±0.87 16 (94.1) |
5. IFN-I pathway is consistently activated in several RMDs, but assays measuring IFN-I pathway activation cannot be currently recommended for diagnostic purposes. | 2b/3b | 8.58±1.83 12 (70.5) |
6. IFN-I pathway assays define more severe subgroups within many RMDs, so they should be considered in stratification studies. | 2b/3b | 8.70±1.31 12 (70.5) |
7. IFN-I pathway activation is associated with disease activity in some RMDs, especially SLE and myositis, but its added value in clinical decision making is uncertain. | 2b/3b | 8.82±1.18 14 (82.3) |
8. IFN-I pathway assays can predict disease exacerbations, in particular flare occurrence in patients with SLE, but further work should be performed to determine to what extent they outperform current instruments. | 2b | 9.00±1.00 16 (94.1) |
9. IFN-I pathway assays might predict progression from preclinical autoimmunity to clinical disease. | 2b | 8.00±1.69 11 (64.7) |
10. In SLE, IFN-I pathway assays may be useful in predicting response to IFN-I targeting therapies. | 2b | 8.76±1.20 14 (82.3) |
11. IFN-I pathway assay results may be affected by some treatments (eg, IFN-targeted therapies and high-dose glucocorticoids), and timing of sample collection should be taken into account and reported. | 2b/3b | 9.70±0.46 17 (100) |
IFN-I, type I interferon; RMD, rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease; SLE, systematic literature review.