Table 3

Meta-analyses of good outcomes likelihood ratios for the 4V-remission and 3V-remission status

Good outcome*4V-Remission (vs non-4V)I2 LR+
LR−
3V-Remission (vs non-3V)I2 LR+
LR−
LR+ (95% CI)LR− (95% CI)LR+ (95% CI)LR− (95% CI)
ΔmTSS ≤0.51.36 (1.15 to 1.61)0.92 (0.81 to 1.04)38%
0%
1.26 (1.13 to 1.41)0.86 (0.79 to 0.94)40%
3%
ΔmTSS ≤01.32 (1.17 to 1.50)0.91 (0.82 to 1.02)19%
0%
1.20 (1.12 to 1.29)0.87 (0.81 to 0.93)0%
0%
ΔmTSS ≤51.40 (0.88 to 2.23)1.01 (0.76 to 1.33)56%
0%
1.33 (1.03 to 1.71)0.92 (0.77 to 1.10)40%
0%
ΔHAQ-DI ≤01.34 (1.16 to 1.54)0.90 (0.79 to 1.02)18%
0%
1.08 (0.99 to 1.17)0.94 (0.88 to 1.02)17%
0%
ΔHAQ-DI ≤0 and HAQ-DI ≤0.53.35 (2.78 to 4.03)0.60 (0.52 to 0.68)72%
45%
1.82 (1.59 to 2.07)0.55 (0.47 to 0.65)80%
87%
  • 4V-remission=SJC28, TJC28, CRP (mg/dL) and PGA (0–10), all ≤1; 3V-remission=SJC28, TJC28 and CRP (mg/dL) ≤1; non-remission=SJC28 >1 or TJC28 >1 or CRP (mg/dL) >1, irrespective of PGA value; at 6 or 12 months of follow-up in all cases.

  • *n=5792 for ΔmTSS, n=3904 for ΔHAQ-DI ≤0 and n=5262 for ΔHAQ-DI ≤0 and HAQ-DI ≤0.5.

  • CRP, C reactive protein; ∆HAQ-DI, change in Health Assessment Questionnaire–Disability Index; LR+, positive likelihood ratio; LR−, negative likelihood ratio; ∆mTSS, change in the modified total Sharp score during the second year of follow-up; PGA, patient global assessment; SJC28, swollen 28-joint count; TJC28, tender 28-joint count.