Table 3

Summary of the primary and secondary outcomes across follow-up points*

OutcomeTime point (months)Analysis method (effect size)Adjusted† effect size (95% CI)P valueUnadjusted effect size (95% CI)P value
Primary outcome
CWP
CWP (per protocol)
CWP (with multiple imputation)
3Logistic regression (OR)1.08 (0.74 to 1.58)0.6911.07 (0.75 to 1.53)0.716
1.15 (0.75 to 1.75)0.5191.18 (0.77 to 1.66)0.522
1.06 (0.74 to 1.54)0.7491.05 (0.72 to 1.53)0.816
CWP
CWP (per protocol)
CWP (with multiple imputation)
121.05 (0.75 to 1.48)0.7711.04 (0.72 to 1.48)0.849
1.11 (0.81 to 1.50)0.5191.09 (0.74 to 1.60)0.673
1.04 (0.75 to 1.45)0.9821.03 (0.74 to 1.42)0.964
CWP
CWP (per protocol)
CWP (with multiple imputation)
240.85 (0.68 to 1.07)0.1630.84 (0.61 to 1.18)0.317
0.85 (0.64 to 1.12)0.2410.84 (0.58 to 1.20)0.330
0.85 (0.66 to 1.09)0.2200.84 (0.65 to 1.09)0.196
CWP3, 12, 24GEE (OR)1.00 (0.96 to 1.04)0.9231.00 (0.96 to 1.04)0.835
Secondary outcomes
Global impression of change§3Ordinal logistic regression (OR)0.42 (0.32 to 0.55)<0.0010.43 (0.34 to 0.56)<0.001
120.51 (0.39 to 0.67)<0.0010.53 (0.41 to 0.68)<0.001
240.55 (0.43 to 0.70)<0.0010.58 (0.45 to 0.73)<0.001
 CWP risk profileSomatic symptoms score3Ordinal logistic regression (OR)0.79 (0.60 to 1.03)0.0840.83 (0.64 to 1.08)0.173
120.86 (0.71 to 1.04)0.1120.85 (0.65 to 1.11)0.237
240.81 (0.59 to 1.12)0.2060.90 (0.67 to 1.21)0.498
Illness behaviour score3Linear regression (mean difference)−0.17 (−0.58 to 0.24)0.385−0.25 (−0.79 to 0.29)0.360
12−0.81 (−1.54 to −0.09)0.030−0.74 (−1.32 to −0.17)0.011
24−1.25 (−2.15 to −0.35)0.010−1.20 (−1.83 to −0.58)<0.001
Sleep problems score3Linear regression (mean difference)−0.62 (−1.26 to 0.02)0.057−0.62 (−1.31 to 0.08)0.081
12−0.95 (−1.48 to −0.42)0.002−1.00 (−1.70 to −0.30)0.005
24−0.51 (−1.25 to 0.23)0.161−0.52 (−1.39 to 0.16)0.117
Psychological distress (GHQ)3Ordinal logistic regression (OR)0.55 (0.43 to 0.69)<0.0010.58 (0.45 to 0.76)<0.001
120.65 (0.50 to 0.86)0.0020.70 (0.54 to 0.90)0.007
240.76 (0.60 to 0.96)0.0240.74 (0.56 to 0.98)0.037
Chalder Fatigue Score3Linear regression (mean difference)−1.36 (−2.10 to −0.64)0.001−1.40 (−1.97 to −0.82)<0.001
12−1.02 (−1.63 to −0.42)0.003−1.03 (−1.64 to −0.42)0.001
24−0.93 (−1.62 to −0.23)0.012−0.93 (−1.58 to −0.27)0.006
Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L utility score)3Linear regression (mean difference)0.009 (−0.009 to 0.028)0.3040.021 (−0.004 to 0.046)0.101
120.024 (0.009 to 0.040)0.0040.037 (0.010 to 0.064)0.007
240.030 (0.009 to 0.050)0.0080.040 (0.011 to 0.069)0.007
ICECAP-A tariff3Ordinal logistic regression (OR)1.14 (0.89 to 1.48)0.3041.17 (0.86 to 1.59)0.323
121.39 (0.94 to 2.04)0.0961.39 (1.01 to 1.91)0.042
240.88 (0.67 to 1.15)0.3380.99 (0.70 to 1.41)0.966
 Fibromyalgia criteriaWidespread Pain Index3Poisson regression (IRR)0.98 (0.90 to 1.07)0.6981.01 (0.93 to 1.10)0.771
120.88 (0.80 to 0.98)0.0180.92 (0.84 to 0.99)0.036
240.88 (0.78 to 0.98)0.0220.92 (0.84 to 1.00)0.058
Symptom Severity Scale3Linear regression (mean difference)−0.28 (−0.52 to −0.04)0.026−0.25 (−0.57 to 0.65)0.118
12−0.52 (−0.75 to −0.28)<0.001−0.59 (−0.91 to −0.27)<0.001
24−0.29 (−0.55 to −0.02)0.040−0.28 (−0.61 to 0.05)0.100
  • *Analyses shaded in grey favour tCBT over usual care at prespecified significance level for secondary outcomes (p<0.01). Except for EQ-5D-5L, mean differences less than 0 and ORs less than 1 favour the treatment group.

  • †Adjusted analyses control for the number of risk factors (two or three), age, gender, baseline score (if applicable) and centre (random effect). Analyses are intention to treat unless otherwise stated.

  • ‡Primary outcome.

  • §OR of 1 point increase in global impression of change score (worsening of health).

  • CWP, chronic widespread pain; EQ5D-5D-5L, EuroQol Questionnaire-five dimensions-five levels; GEE, generalised estimating equations; GHQ, General Health Questionnaire; ICECAP-A, ICEpop CAPability measure for Adults; IRR, incidence rate ratio; ;tCBT, telephone-delivered cognitive–behavioural therapy.