Table 4

Primary and secondary outcomes at 24-month follow-up for the subgroup of patients with mechanical symptoms at baseline. Values are means with 95% CIs and numbers (percentage)

APM (n=32)Placebo surgery (n=37)Improvement from baselineBetween-Group Difference in Improvement from Baseline or P value
Primary outcomesAPMPlacebo surgery
WOMET score79.9 (72.4 to 87.5)86.4 (81.5 to 91.3)27.6 (18.0 to 37.1)37.4 (30.1 to 44.7)−9.8 (−21.5 to 1.8)
Lysholm knee score81.8 (75.8 to 87.7)86.9 (82.8 to 91.0)28.3 (21.0 to 35.5)34.1 (28.8 to 39.4)−5.9 (−14.6 to 2.8)
Pain after exercise 2.6 (1.7 to 3.5) 1.9 (1.2 to 2.6)3.3 (2.2 to 4.4)4.5 (3.7 to 5.3)−1.2 (−2.5 to 0.2)
Secondary outcomes
Satisfied patients25 (78.1)30 (81.1)p=0.774
Improved patients27 (84.4)33 (89.2)p=0.723
Treatment-group unblinding 2 (6.3) 1 (2.7)p=0.593
Returned to normal activities20 (64.5)29 (78.4)p=0.279
Mechanical symptoms11 (34.4)11 (29.7)p=0.797
At least one positive meniscal test14 (43.8)14 (37.8)p=0.633
  • One patient missing return to activity in APM group (n=31). p Values for interaction (randomisation and mechanical symptoms) were 0.113, 0.268 and 0.097 for the change in WOMET score, Lysholm knee score and pain after exercise, respectively.

  • APM, arthroscopic partial meniscectomy; WOMET, Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool.