Table 5

Primary and secondary outcomes at 24-month follow-up for the subgroup of patients with unstable meniscus tear. Values are means with 95% CIs and numbers (percentage)

APM (n=34)Placebo surgery (n=39)Improvement from baseline (or 24mo)Between-Group Difference in Improvement from Baseline or P value
Primary outcomesAPMPlacebo surgery
WOMET score84.6 (78.0 to 91.3)84.5 (78.9 to 90.0)27.7 (19.5 to 35.9)33.3 (27.5 to 39.1)−5.6 (−15.3 to 4.1)
Lysholm knee score84.5 (78.7 to 90.3)86.7 (83.2 to 90.3)23.4 (16.7 to 30.2)27.5 (22.6 to 32.4)−4.0 (−12.1 to 4.0)
Pain after exercise 2.2 (1.4 to 3.0) 2.2 (1.5 to 3.0) 3.5 (2.6 to 4.4) 4.1 (3.2 to 4.9)−0.6 (−1.8 to 0.6)
Secondary outcomes
Treatment-group unblinding 3 (8.8%) 3 (7.3%)p=1.000
Satisfied patients26 (76.5%)31 (79.5%)p=0.784
Improved patients30 (88.2%)35 (89.7%)p=1.000
Returned to normal activities23 (67.6%)30 (76.9%)p=0.436
Mechanical symptoms 8 (23.5)10 (25.6)p=1.000
At least one positive meniscal test10 (29.4)13 (33.3)p=0.803
  • Two patients lost to follow-up, both in placebo-surgery group. p Values for interaction (randomisation and unstable tear) were 0.701, 0.754 and 0.623 for the change in WOMET score, Lysholm knee score and pain after exercise, respectively.

  • APM, arthroscopic partial meniscectomy; WOMET, Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool.