Table 1

Types of candidate definitions for response criteria that were developed and tested

Type of candidate definitions of responseDescriptionExample of the candidate definition for the response criteria
Previously published (categorical definition)Previously published response criteria that were retestedMinimal. Three of any 6 improved by ≥20%, no more than 1 worse by >30% (which cannot be CMAS)10
Moderate. Three of any 6 improved by ≥50%, no more than 1 worse by >30% (which cannot be CMAS)11
Major. Three of any 6 improved by ≥70%, no more than 1 worse by >30% (which cannot be CMAS)11
Newly drafted (categorical definition)Drafted relative or absolute per cent change in candidate definitions of response, based on recent CSM surveyMinimal. MD global, muscle strength (MMT or CMAS), and 1 other CSM improved by ≥20%
Moderate. MD global, muscle strength (MMT or CMAS), and 1 other CSM improved by ≥30%
Major. MD global, muscle strength (MMT or CMAS), and 1 other CSM improved by ≥50%
Weighted (categorical definition)Applied conjoint analysis relative weights to CSM in newly drafted definitions; each CSM receives improvement points (corresponding relative weights) when it reaches the threshold for minimal, moderate, or major improvement; worsening points are applied similarly; improvement is calculated based on a total score of improvement vs worseningImprovement=at least 3.5 improvement points of 10 total improvement points, and no more than 1.5 worsening points, where MD global=2 points, parent global=1 point, MMT/CMAS=3 points, C-HAQ=1.5 points, extramusc/DAS=1.5 points, enzyme/CHQ-PhS=1 point
Minimal. Improvement points given when CSM ≥20%; worsening points given when CSM worse by >30%
Moderate. Improvement points given when CSM ≥50%; worsening points given when CSM worse by >30%
Major. Improvement points given when CSM ≥75%; worsening points given when CSM worse by >30%
Logistic regression (continuous definition)Model of improvement using a combination of CSM with different weights, as developed in the logistic regression model; total scores derived, with different cutoffs for minimal, moderate, and major improvement Relative % changeImprovement score=(MD global % change)+0.5×(parent global activity % change)+0.5×(extramusc activity or DAS % change)
Minimal. Improvement score ≥15
Moderate. Improvement score ≥30
Major. Improvement score ≥60
CSM–weighted (continuous definition)*Multiply the % change in each CSM by the weights derived from conjoint analysis, then sum (% change in each CSM×conjoint analysis weights) to get final total improvement score; different thresholds for minimal, moderate, and major improvement established based on consensus profile ratings as gold standardImprovement score=2×(MD global % change)+(parent global % change)+3×(MMT or CMAS % change)+1.5×(C-HAQ % change)+1.5×(extramusc or DAS % change)+(enzyme or CHQ-PhS % change)
Minimal. Improvement score ≥100
Moderate. Improvement score ≥250
Major. Improvement score ≥400
Conjoint analysis (continuous definition)For a given range in the level of improvement in each CSM, a score is assigned, as developed by the survey results and modelling; greater degrees of improvement receive higher scores; a patient is minimally improved if the improvement score is above the cutoff for minimal improvement; similarly for moderate and major improvementCut points for the model for juvenile DM are:
  • Minimal. Improvement score ≥30

  • Moderate. Improvement score ≥45

  • Major. Improvement score ≥70†

  • *This type of definition was not brought to the final consensus conference.

  • †The full absolute per cent change model is shown in table 3 and in online supplementary table S2 (available on the Arthritis & Rheumatology web site at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/art.40060/abstract).

  • C-HAQ, Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire; CHQ-PhS, physical summary score of the Child Health Questionnaire–Parent Form 50; CMAS, Childhood Myositis Assessment Scale; CSM, core set measure; DAS, Disease Activity Score; DM, dermatomyositis; enzyme, most abnormal serum muscle enzyme value among aldolase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, and creatine kinase; extramusc, extramuscular global activity; MD global, physician global activity score; MMT, manual muscle testing; parent global, parent global activity score.