Table 4

Efficacy outcomes at weeks 4 and 8

OutcomePooled placebo (N=27)MOR103
0.3 mg/kg (N=24)1.0 mg/kg (N=22)1.5 mg/kg (N=23)
Week 4Week 8Week 4Week 8Week 4Week 8Week 4Week 8
Response assessments, n (%)
EULAR
 Good1 (3.7)1 (3.7)3 (12.5)1 (4.2)5 (22.7)7 (31.8)1 (4.3)2 (8.7)
 Moderate1 (3.7)6 (22.2)6 (25.0)7 (29.2)10 (45.5)6 (27.3)15 (65.2)11 (47.8)
 None20 (74.1)15 (55.6)14 (58.3)13 (54.2)6 (27.3)6 (27.3)7 (30.4)10 (43.5)
 Missing5 (18.5)5 (18.5)1 (4.2)3 (12.5)1 (4.5)3 (13.6)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
 p Value*0.060.910.00020.0190.00010.2565
ACR
 ACR202 (7.4)5 (18.5)6 (25.0)3 (12.5)15 (68.2)†7 (31.8)7 (30.4)6 (26.1)
 ACR501 (3.7)2 (7.4)1 (4.2)0 (0.0)5 (22.7)4 (18.2)2 (8.7)0 (0.0)
 ACR700 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (4.2)0 (0.0)1 (4.5)2 (9.1)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
 Missing5 (18.5)5 (18.5)1 (4.2)3 (12.5)1 (4.5)2 (9.1)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Additional efficacy assessments, change from baseline in mean values (SD)
DAS280.2 (0.8)−0.1 (0.9)−0.2 (1.1)−0.3 (0.9)−1.1 (0.9)†−1.0 (1.3)‡−0.6 (0.7)‡−0.6 (0.9)
Swollen joints0.1 (3.5)−0.8 (3.6)−1.7 (2.4)‡−1.9 (2.2)−3.5 (5.1)‡−4.1 (4.4)‡−3.3 (3.2)‡−3.3 (3.1)‡
Tender joints2.0 (6.4)2.1 (8.0)0.1 (7.1)0.3 (5.0)−4.8 (3.2)§−6.8 (4.1)†−3.7 (6.2)‡−4.0 (5.3)§
ESR (mm/h)2.8 (12.5)0.9 (13.1)8.8 (24.5)2.0 (16.6)−6.3 (12.5)−0.7 (17.4)−2.5 (17.7)−0.6 (14.3)
Pain−3.3 (16.5)−8.0 (16.1)−8.6 (22.8)−4.1 (23.1)−17.4 (17.2)‡−13.4 (20.9)−11.4 (11.5)−9.5 (11.9)
HAQ-DI−0.45 (0.54)−0.44 (0.54)−0.21 (0.41)‡−0.21 (0.56)−0.53 (0.52)−0.51 (0.56)−0.31 (0.24)−0.25 (0.22)
Physician GA−3.0 (15.7)−3.5 (16.3)−0.6 (19.7)−4.7 (20.0)−18.0 (19.6)‡−18.1 (22.6)‡−7.8 (10.8)−6.5 (13.4)
Patient GA−3.0 (16.1)−8.2 (17.5)−2.7 (20.5)−4.5 (21.9)−16.6 (15.6)‡−13.3 (24.7)−6.0 (17.7)−4.0 (18.3)
FACIT fatigue scores3.0 (8.1)4.3 (9.1)2.7 (9.2)2.1 (5.6)9.1 (10.2)‡9.4 (12.6)3.1 (6.0)4.7 (7.1)
  • *p Values for pairwise comparisons with pooled placebo group determined by Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test (missing values not included).

  • †p<0.0001 for pairwise comparisons with pooled placebo group. Fisher's exact test was used for ACR response (missing values not included) and ANCOVA was used for additional efficacy assessments.

  • ‡p<0.05 for pairwise comparisons with placebo group by ANCOVA.

  • §p<0.001 for pairwise comparisons with placebo group by ANCOVA.

  • ACR, American College of Rheumatology; ANCOVA, analysis of covariance; DAS28, Disease Activity Score-28 joints; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; EULAR, European League Against Rheumatism; FACIT, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy; GA, global assessment of disease activity; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index.