Table 2

BASDAI, ASAS and ASDAS response rates in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) compared with patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) after 1 year of treatment with etanercept

Parameter at week 48ETA, AS, (n=20)ETA, nr-axSpA (n=20)
BASDAI20, % (95% CI)80 (59 to 93)85 (65 to 96)
BASDAI50, % (95% CI)55 (34 to 75)75 (54 to 90)
ASAS40, % (95% CI)75 (54 to 90)65 (43 to 83)
ASAS partial remission, % (95% CI)40 (21 to 62)60 (38 to 79)
ASDAS clinically important improvement, %*55 (34 to 75)75 (54 to 90)
ASDAS major improvement, %†30 (14 to 52)25 (10 to 46)
ASDAS inactive disease (<1.3), % (95% CI)40 (21 to 62)40 (21 to 62)
  • Results shown as percentage (%) and 95% CI. No statistical differences between patients with AS versus nr-axSpA were found for any of the parameters (p>0.05).

  • *ASDAS clinically important improvement: change of ASDAS between baseline and follow-up ≥1.1.

  • †ASAS major improvement: change of ASDAS between baseline and follow-up ≥2.0.

  • AS, ankylosing spondylitis; ASDAS, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score; ASAS40/partial remission, response of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international society (ASAS) criteria for 40% improvement in disease activity; ASAS criteria for partial remission; BASDAI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index; BASDAI20/50, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index criteria for 20% and 50% improvement at week 48; CRP, C-reactive protein; ETA, etanercept; n, number of patients; nr-axSpA, nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis.