Table 2

The prevalence (%) of osteophytes (grade 1–3) in each finger joint by different modalities in patients with HOA

JointMRI* (n=852)Modality US (n=3771)CR (n=3405)BE (n=3785)
CMC1n/a72.1%66.5%38.2%
MCP1n/a24.2%6.6%11.9%
2n/a13.4%8.3%9.5%
3n/a6.8%2.2%2.8%
4n/a3.6%1.3%4.0%
5n/a11.1%4.4%0.0%
1–5 (mean)n/a11.8%4.5%4.9%
(P)IP1n/a79.7%45.2%36.5%
282.2%55.1%34.5%39.0%
374.8%61.4%31.0%47.2%
473.8%53.1%29.7%35.4%
585.8%61.5%35.4%44.9%
1–5 (mean)79.2%62.2%34.3%40.6%
DIP296.2%93.7%53.9%82.7%
395.3%90.6%48.9%74.8%
486.9%76.3%32.8%60.6%
597.2%89.7%59.2%70.1%
2–5 (mean)93.9%87.5%48.7%72.0%
  • * Only dominant hand.

  • One joint missing, thus sum score is not comparable with other modalities.

  • BE, bony enlargement; CMC, carpometacarpal joint; CR, conventional radiography; DIP, distal interphalangeal joint; HOA, hand osteoarthritis; MCP, metacarpophalangeal joint, MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; US, Ultrasound; n/a, not available; (P)IP=(proximal) interphalangeal joint.