Table 4

Effect of recommendation adherence on radiographic progression and disability

One additional erosion at 1 year n=684*HAQ score ≥1 at 2 years n=640*
OR (95% CI)p ValueOR (95% CI)p Value
Unadjusted1.79 (1.11 to 2.89)0.023.01 (1.70 to 5.33)0.0002
Adjusted for confounding factors and centre1.94 (1.09 to 3.45)0.032.55 (1.31 to 4.96)0.009
Adjusted for propensity score1.83 (1.10 to 3.05)0.022.28 (1.25 to 4.18)0.007
Adjusted for propensity score, confounding factors and centre1.98 (1.08 to 3.62)0.032.36 (1.17 to 4.67)0.02
  • Mixed logistic regression with confounding factors as fixed effects and treatment centre as a random effect.

  • * 684 patients with a calculated propensity score among the 725 patients with the radiographic progression outcome available; 640 patients with a calculated propensity score among the 679 patients with the disability outcome available.

  • Confounding factors included:

    for radiographic progression: age, sex and erosions score at baseline.

    for HAQ: age, sex and HAQ score at baseline.

  • HAQ, health assessment questionnaire.