Berlin | Birmingham | Heraklion | Lund | Prague | Stockholm | Umeå | Vienna | Warsaw | Zurich | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Delay 1: Patient delay* | ||||||||||
Berlin | ||||||||||
Birmingham | <0.001 | |||||||||
Heraklion | <0.001 | NS | ||||||||
Lund | 0.004 | NS | NS | |||||||
Prague | 0.041 | NS | 0.004 | NS | ||||||
Stockholm | NS | NS | <0.001 | NS | NS | |||||
Umeå | 0.010 | NS | 0.018 | NS | NS | NS | ||||
Vienna | NS | 0.012 | <0.001 | NS | NS | NS | NS | |||
Warsaw | NS | 0.026 | <0.001 | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||
Zurich | 0.003 | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
Delay 3: Initial HCP delay† | ||||||||||
Berlin | ||||||||||
Birmingham | 0.004 | |||||||||
Heraklion | 0.026 | NS | ||||||||
Lund | NS | 0.012 | NS | |||||||
Prague | NS | 0.001 | 0.005 | NS | ||||||
Stockholm | 0.036 | NS | NS | NS | 0.006 | |||||
Umeå | NS | 0.045 | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||||
Vienna | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |||
Warsaw | NS | 0.002 | 0.014 | NS | NS | 0.019 | NS | NS | ||
Zurich | NS | 0.014 | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
Delay 4: Rheumatologist delay‡ | ||||||||||
Berlin | ||||||||||
Birmingham | 0.004 | |||||||||
Heraklion | <0.001 | NS | ||||||||
Lund | <0.001 | NS | NS | |||||||
Prague | 0.029 | NS | NS | NS | ||||||
Stockholm | <0.001 | NS | NS | NS | NS | |||||
Umeå | 0.011 | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||||
Vienna | <0.001 | <0.001 | NS | NS | <0.001 | 0.023 | <0.001 | |||
Warsaw | <0.001 | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | 0.003 | ||
Zurich | <0.001 | 0.045 | NS | NS | 0.007 | NS | 0.020 | NS | NS |
Dunn's multiple comparisons test was used to compare each level of delay between pairs of centres. p Values are shown. Where p>0.05, this was regarded as NS.
* Symptom onset to request to see initial healthcare professional (HCP) of contact (delay 1: patient delay).
† Initial assessment by HCP to referral to a rheumatologist (delay 3: initial HCP delay).
‡ Referral to a rheumatologist to assessment by that rheumatologist (delay 4: rheumatologist delay).