Table 2

MRI scores of sacroiliac joints, spine, enthesitis and posterior segments of the spine at baseline, week 24 and at week 48 in the etanercept versus sulfasalazine treatment group

Parameters assessedTimeEtanercept group (n=40)Sulfasalazine group (n=36)p Value*
MRI sacroiliac joint score (0–24), mean (SD)Baseline7.8 (6.3)5.4 (5.1)
Week 243.1 (3.6)3.7 (3.2)0.006
Week 482.4 (3.2)3.5 (3.8)0.02
MRI spine score (0–69), mean (SD)Baseline2.3 (3.5)1.4 (3.1)
Week 241.4 (3.1)1.5 (3.1)0.03
Week 481.0 (2.1)1.3 (2.9)0.01
MRI enthesitisBaseline26 sites (in 15 patients)24 sites (in 16 patients)
Week 2422 sites (in 12 patients)23 sites (in 14 patients)0.67
Week 4811 sites (in 11 patients)26 sites (in 14 patients)0.04
MRI posterior segments of the spineBaseline37 sites (in 9 patients)18 sites (in 4 patients)
Week 2430 sites (in 4 patients)13 sites (in 2 patients)0.78
Week 4826 sites (in 2 patients)13 sites (in 1 patient)0.92
  • * p Values for comparison of changes in the MRI scores between both groups by analysis of covariance.

  • No significant differences at baseline between etanercept and sulfasalazine: sacroiliac joints (p=0.06), spine (p=0.09), enthesitis (p=0.50), posterior segments (p=0.25).

  • Only active osteitis (hyperintense bone signal in the STIR sequence) was scored as enthesitis.