Table 1

Demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline

Total population (N=235)Anti-TNF naive patients (n=183)IFX switchers (n=52)IFX switchers with anti-IFX (n=33)IFX switchers without anti-IFX (n=19)
Demographics
 Age, years53±1253±1252±1254±1049±13
 Female, n (%)185 (79)142 (78)43 (83)27 (82)16 (84)
DMARD treatment
 Prior DMARDs3.5±1.73.2±1.4*,,4.4±2.2*4.3±2.24.7±2.1
 Methotrexate use, n (%)193 (82)150 (82)43 (83)28 (85)15 (79)
 Methotrexate dose (mg/week)23 (15–25)25 (15–25)20 (13–25)18 (11–25)20 (15–25)
 Prednisone use, n (%)80 (34)56 (31)*,24 (46)*13 (39)11 (58)
 Prednisone dose (mg/day)7.5 (5–10)7.0 (5–10),7.5 (5–10)5 (4-6),§10 (10–10),§
Disease status
 Disease duration (years)9 (4–17)8 (4–17)12 (6–18)13 (6–18)9 (3–17)
 Rheumatoid factor positive, n (%)171 (73)130 (71)41 (79)28 (85)13 (68)
 Erosive disease, n (%)182 (77)140 (77)*,42 (81)*,28 (85)14 (74)
 Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/h)29±2328±2236±2637±2733±23
 C-reactive protein (mg/dl)11 (5–24)11 (5–24)10 (3–35)8 (2–36)14 (5–35)
 DAS285.2±1.25.1±1.25.4±1.35.3±1.25.7±1.4
  • Mean values ± SD, median (IQR) or percentages are shown.

  • * There were significant differences between anti-TNF naive patients and switchers for prior DMARDs (p=0.000), prednisone use (p=0.037) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (p=0.025).

  • There were significant differences between anti-TNF naive patients and switchers with anti-infliximab for prior DMARDs (p=0.009), prednisone dose (p=0.013) and ESR (p=0.027).

  • Between anti-TNF naive and switchers without anti-IFX for prior DMARDs (p=0.006) and prednisone use (p=0.016) and dose (p=0.007).

  • § There was a significant difference between infliximab switchers with and without anti-infliximab for prednisone dose (p=0.000).

  • DAS28, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints; DMARDs, disease modifying antirheumatic drugs; IFX, infliximab; TNF, tumour necrosis factor.