Table 2 Median (interquartile range) clinical efficacy outcomes at weeks 14 and 26
VariableAt 14 4eeksAt 26 weeks
Change placebo (n = 7)Change infliximab (n = 10)Mann–Whitney U p ValueChange placebo (n = 7)Change infliximab (n = 10)Mann–Whitney U p Value
EMS0 (−90 to 0)−30 (−120 to 3.75)0.6690 (−90 to 0)−28 (−64 to 60)0.962
Pain VAS−13 (−24 to 10)−19 (−41 to 26)0.887−24 (−35 to 10)−12 (−37 to 15)0.669
Patient global VAS−3 (−25 to −1)−17 (−34 to 7)0.962−24 (−41 to −2)−16 (−35 to 10)0.475
Physician global VAS9 (−22 to 25)−6 (−44 to 10)0.181−20 (−31 to 12)−16 (−40 to 10)0.607
Fatigue VAS−25 (−43 to 1)5 (−12 to 14)0.193−37 (−43 to 1)−2 (−20 to 14)0.043
CRP16 (−7 to 67)−6 (−18 to 3)0.088−4 (−18 to 48)−7 (−18 to 10)0.536
TJC680 (−15 to 10)−13 (−16 to 0)0.3640 (−24 to 5)−11 (−16 to −5)0.364
SJC66−1 (−7 to 3)−6 (−9 to −1)0.133−1 (−6 to 2)−5 (−9 to 2)0.417
HAQ score−0.500 (−0.625 to 0.000)−0.875 (−1.063 to −0.375)0.088−0.50 (−0.63 to −0.13)−0.94 (−1.03 to −0.13)0.193
  • No significant difference between the infliximab and placebo groups was seen for any secondary outcome measure.

  • CRP, C-reactive protein; EMS, early morning stiffness; HAQ, Health Assessment Questionnaire; SJC66, number of swollen joints, of 66 joints assessed; TJC68, number of tender joints, of 68 joints assessed; VAS, visual analogue score along a 100 mm scale.