Table 1 Bone erosions in metacarpophalangeal joint and wrist bones: comparison between high field MRI, low field MRI and radiography
Examined bone*Examined bones†, nHigh field MRILow field MRIx ray
Erosions, nErosions, nSensitivitySpecificityAccuracyICC‡Erosions, nSensitivitySpecificityAccuracy
Base of MC27710.14N/A0.14−0.058§00.00N/A0.00
Base of MC310510.201.000.600.11000.001.000.50
Base of MC49410.251.000.670.18200.001.000.56
Trapezoid6510.201.000.330.85400.001.000.17
Capitate7720.29N/A0.290.49200.00N/A0.00
Hamate10840.501.000.60−0.009§10.131.000.30
Scaphoid7640.671.000.710.71400.001.000.14
Lunate7740.57N/A0.570.61100.00N/A0.00
Triquetrum101050.50N/A0.500.88400.00N/A0.00
Distal radius7650.830.000.710.40710.171.000.29
Distal ulna6540.801.000.830.42020.401.000.50
Total8670320.460.940.550.68940.061.000.23
  • ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; MC, metacarpal; NA, not applicable.

  • *Bony sites excluded from scoring included the base of metacarpals 1 and 5, trapezium and pisiform as these are infrequently visualised.

  • †Where complete data for all three imaging modalities available for comparison.

  • ‡p<0.001.

  • §Intraclass correlation coefficient negative due to slight inverse relation between high and low field scores for these sites (indicating poor agreement).