Usefulness
|
Contact with the team in general was good | 2 (1 to 3) |
Contact with the team has been very useful | 2 (1 to 4) |
Interpersonal approach
|
Health professionals had respect for me | 2 (1 to 4) |
Health professionals were interested in me | 2 (1 to 3) |
Health professionals were very friendly | 2 (1 to 4) |
Communication
|
A lot of verbal information was provided about possibilities of remaining in the workforce | 2 (1 to 5) |
Health professionals listened to my wishes and ideas concerning care | 2 (1 to 3) |
Professional knowledge
|
Health professionals had experience with my problems | 2 (1 to 4) |
Health professionals gave good explanations and advice | 2 (1 to 4) |
Health professionals had good technical skills | 2 (1 to 4) |
Health professionals knew what they were talking about | 2 (1 to 4) |
Health professionals gave impossible advice | 2 (1 to 5) |
Effectiveness
|
The programme had a positive effect on my work situation | 3 (1 to 5) |
The advice given was very useful | 2 (1 to 4) |
Quality of information: general |
Written information about goals and methods was good | 2 (1 to 5) |
Quality of information: individual |
Advice given was clear and practical | 2 (1 to 5) |
The first meeting was very informative | 2 (1 to 5) |
Coordination
|
The team members knew from each other what they were doing | 2 (1 to 5) |
Collaboration among the care providers was good | 3 (1 to 5) |
Final report
|
The results of the programme were well summarised | 2 (1 to 5) |
The final visit was very useful | 2 (1 to 5) |
The final report was written promptly after the guidance had ended | 3 (1 to 5) |