Table 2

Summary of the quality assessment of the shoulder disability questionnaires

QuestionnaireTime to administerEase of scoringReadability and comprehensionContent validityInternal consistencyConstruct validityFloor/ceiling effectReliabilityAgreementResponsivenessInterpretabilityMCID
MCID, minimal clinically important difference; method or result was rated as: + good; o doubtful; − poor; ? no data available.
Kinds of study population(s) used in the clinimetric studies: (a) community; (b) primary care; (c) outpatient clinic; and (d) hospital patient.
SDQ-UK?+?+?++ (b); −(a)?????
SIQ?+++o++o+++?
OSQ?+++o++?+++?
SDQ-NL+++o?+− (b)??+ (b); o (b)++
RC-QOL?o++?++?o?o?
DASH+o++?+ (c, d); o (c)+ (c)+ (c)+ (c)+ (c); o (d)+?
WOSI?o++?+?+?o??
SSRS++??o (c)+ (d)o (d)o (d)o (d)+?
SRQ+++oo?ooooo
SST+??+o+ (c); o (d)+ (c)o (d)o (c, d)o (c, d)+?
WOOS+o++?o?o?o??
SSI+???+ (c)+ (c)o (d)o (d)o (d)??
UEFS++?+o+??o+?
ASES+?o+ (c); o (d)+ (d); o (c)o (c, d)o (d)o (c, d)+?
SPADI+?o+ (c); o (b, c)+ (b, c)o (c, d)+ (c); o (d)+ (c); o (b, d)++
UEFL?+??+− (a)?????