RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 POS0256 AUTOMATED CAPILLARY DETECTION AND IMAGE ANALYSIS SOFTWARE IN CAPILLAROSCOPY: CAPILLARY.IO
JF Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
JO Ann Rheum Dis
FD BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism
SP 350
OP 351
DO 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.4022
VO 80
IS Suppl 1
A1 B. Gracia Tello
A1 E. Ramos
A1 C. P. Simeón-Aznar
A1 V. Fonollosa Pla
A1 A. Guillén-Del-Castillo
A1 A. Selva-O’callaghan
A1 L. Sáez-Comet
A1 E. Martínez Robles
A1 J. J. Rios
A1 G. Espinosa
A1 J. A. Todolí Parra
A1 J. L. Callejas-Rubio
A1 N. Ortego
A1 B. Marí-Alfonso
A1 M. Freire
A1 P. Fanlo
YR 2021
UL http://ard.bmj.com/content/80/Suppl_1/350.2.abstract
AB Background: A nailfold capillaroscopy procedure is a non-invasive, low-cost, and well-established examination that can be used to diagnose several rheumatic autoimmune diseases and support the necessary follow-up of patients. There are two main elements to nailfold capillaroscopy: image acquisition and image interpretation. Both of these can present challenges: we need to ensure that the best possible images are captured, and we need to define the enlarged capillaries, capillary loss and pericapillary hemorrhages objectively. We introduce Capillary.io, an automatic image reading system able to recognize capillaries in images obtained with any microscope, generate automatic measurements of each capillary and take advantage of this information to report capillary morphology. Together it allows a comprehensive analysis that is capable of producing detailed reports for each patient.Objectives: The primary outcome was general sensitivity and specificity, using images assessed by expert capillaroscopists as the gold standard.Methods: 6500 images previously analyzed by capillaroscopists from GREC were compared with Capillary.io. Capillary morphology (enlarged capillaries, tortuosities, ramifications, megacapillaries, hemorrhages) of each of the capillaries contained in each of the images was analyzed manually by at least one expert capillaroscopist. Subsequently, the automatic image interpretation system was used to fully automatically analyze each of the capillaries contained in each image and the results obtained were compared.Results: Overall, a total of 78.347 capillaries were compared, of which 47.734 were normal capillaries, 21.991 enlarged capillaries, 2672 megacapillaries, 8512 tortuosities, 1322 ramifications and 5149 hemorrhages. Capillary.io was able to detect 38.101 normal capillaries, 19.126 enlarged capillaries, 2389 megacapillaries, 5698 tortuosities, 718 ramifications and 3706 hemorraghes.Capillary.io presented a sensitivity (S) of 79.82% and a specificity (E) of 82% in the recognition of normal capillaries. The automatized system was able to recognize enlarged capillaries with a sensitivity of 86.97% and a specificity of 81.38%. Megacapillaries were detected with 89.41% sensitivity and 78.75% specificity. Similarly, the system was able to detect tortuosities (S 66.94%; E 67.71%), ramifications (S 54.34%; E 58.61%) and hemorrhages (S 71.36; E 73.97%).Conclusion: Capillary.io is a simple, easy-learning web-based system to get interpretation of nailfold capillaroscopic images. It may be a very useful tool to standardize the interpretation of capillaroscopic pictures and could provide great research in that field.References: [1]Bernardino V, Rodrigues A, Lladó A, Fernandes M, Panarra A. The Impact of Nailfold Capil- laroscopy in the Approach of Microcirculation. In: Vascular Biology - Selection of Mechanisms and Clinical Applications IntechOpen; 2020.[2]Boulon C, Devos S, Mangin M, Chevoir JDL, Senet P, Lazareth I, et al. Reproducibility of capillaro- scopic classifications of systemic sclerosis: results from the SCLEROCAP study. Rheumatology 2017 jul;56(10):1713–1720.[3]Capillary io, Capillaroscopy made quick, simple and objective; 2020. Available at https:// capillary.io.[4]Chen K, Wang J, Pang J, Cao Y, Xiong Y, Li X, et al. MMDetection: Open MMLab Detection Toolbox and Benchmark. arXiv preprint arXiv:190607155 2019;.[5]Cutolo M, Pizzorni C, Sulli A. Nailfold videocapillaroscopy assessment of microvascular damage in systemic sclerosis - Reply. The Journal of Rheumatology 2000 11;27:2722–2723.[6]Cutolo M, Trombetta AC, Melsens K, Pizzorni C, Sulli A, Ruaro B, et al. Automated assessment of absolute nailfold capillary number on videocapillaroscopic images: Proof of principle and validation in systemic sclerosis. Microcirculation 2018 May;25(4):e12447.Disclosure of Interests: Borja Gracia Tello Shareholder of: Co-founder and shareholder of Capillary.io., Eduardo Ramos Shareholder of: co-founder and shareholder of Capillary.io., Carmen Pilar Simeón-Aznar: None declared, Vicent Fonollosa Pla: None declared, Alfredo Guillén-Del-Castillo: None declared, Albert Selva-O’Callaghan: None declared, Luis Sáez-Comet: None declared, Elena Martínez Robles: None declared, Juan José Rios: None declared, Gerard Espinosa: None declared, Jose Antonio Todolí Parra: None declared, Jose Luis Callejas-Rubio: None declared, Norberto Ortego: None declared, Begoña Marí-Alfonso: None declared, Mayka Freire: None declared, Patricia Fanlo: None declared