PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Gerd R Burmester
AU  - Andrea Rubbert-Roth
AU  - Alain Cantagrel
AU  - Stephen Hall
AU  - Piotr Leszczynski
AU  - Daniel Feldman
AU  - Madura J Rangaraj
AU  - Georgia Roane
AU  - Charles Ludivico
AU  - Min Bao
AU  - Lucy Rowell
AU  - Claire Davies
AU  - Eduardo F Mysler
TI  - Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous tocilizumab versus intravenous tocilizumab in combination with traditional DMARDs in patients with RA at week 97 (SUMMACTA)
AID  - 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207281
DP  - 2016 Jan 01
TA  - Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
PG  - 68--74
VI  - 75
IP  - 1
4099  - http://ard.bmj.com/content/75/1/68.short
4100  - http://ard.bmj.com/content/75/1/68.full
SO  - Ann Rheum Dis2016 Jan 01; 75
AB  - Objectives To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) tocilizumab (TCZ) versus intravenous (IV) TCZ, including switching formulations, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs).Methods Patients (n=1262) were randomised 1:1 to receive TCZ-SC 162 mg weekly (qw)+placebo-IV every four weeks (q4w) or TCZ-IV 8 mg/kg q4w+placebo-SC qw in combination with DMARD(s). After a 24-week double-blind period, patients receiving TCZ-SC were re-randomised 11:1 to TCZ-SC (n=521) or TCZ-IV (TCZ-SC–IV, n=48), and patients receiving TCZ-IV were re-randomised 2:1 to TCZ-IV (n=372) or TCZ-SC (TCZ-IV–SC; n=186). Maintenance of clinical responses and safety through week 97 were assessed.Results The proportions of patients who achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20/50/70 responses, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints remission and improvement from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index ≥0.3 were sustained through week 97 and comparable across arms. TCZ-SC had a comparable safety profile to TCZ-IV through week 97, except that injection site reactions (ISRs) were more common with TCZ-SC. Safety profiles in patients who switched were similar to those in patients who received continuous TCZ-SC or TCZ-IV treatment. The proportion of patients who developed anti-TCZ antibodies remained low across treatment arms. No association between anti-TCZ antibody development and clinical response or adverse events was observed.Conclusions The long-term efficacy and safety of TCZ-SC was maintained and comparable to that of TCZ-IV, except for ISRs. Profiles in patients who switched formulations were comparable to those in patients who received TCZ-IV or TCZ-SC. TCZ-SC provides additional treatment options for patients with RA.Trial registration number NCT01194414.