Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Response to: ‘Correspondence on ‘A pilot study of tofacitinib for refractory Behçet’s syndrome’’ by Zou et al
Free
  1. Jinjing Liu1,
  2. Chan Zhao2,
  3. Wenjie Zheng1
  1. 1Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Rheumatology, Ministry of Education, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
  2. 2Department of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Key Laboratory of Ocular Fundus Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
  1. Correspondence to Professor Wenjie Zheng, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100730, China; wenjzheng{at}gmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

We thank Zou and colleagues for their interests and insightful comments1 on our recently published work2 and are impressed by the encouraging results of tofacitinib on patients with refractory Behçet’s uveitis (BU).

In this study, 5 mg two times per day tofacitinib was given to active patients with BU with prednisone reduced from 50 to 60 mg per day to 30 mg per day and withdrawal of conventional immunosuppressants (cyclosporine A or tacrolimus), which lead to treatment ‘success’ and ‘flare’ in 10 (76.9%) and 3 (23.1%) of the 13 included patients, respectively. Moreover, all the 10 patients responded to tofacitinib discontinued corticosteroid during a follow-up period between 24 and 38 months. This study provides preliminary evidence that tofacitinib might be a promising treatment for refractory BU. A minor disadvantage is that the authors did not evaluate the fundus based on a standard scoring system.3

While there is evidence that Janus kinase (JAK)-mediated pathways are activated in active Behçet’s syndrome (BS),4 our study revealed that different phenotypes of BS responded variably to tofacitinib, which suggest that the role of tofacitinib in various BS phenotypes should be addressed individually due to the complexity and heterogeneity of BS.2 Studies on intraocular inflammatory markers revealed significantly increased levels of interleukin (IL)-2, IL-8, IL-13, tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), eotaxin and IL-1ra in aqueous humour samples from patients with BU.5 Tofacitinib is a small molecule pan-JAK inhibitor, it is reasonable to infer that tofacitinib can cross the blood-ocular barriers easily to exert its anti-inflammatory effects in the eye by inhibiting multiple cytokine pathways.

Several studies have reported the effectiveness of JAK inhibitors in treating non-infectious uveitis. In a mouse model of experimental autoimmune uveitis, tofacitinib significantly suppressed secretion of IFN-γ and development of disease.6 In a retrospective clinical study, juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) cases refractory to at least two biological agents (including TNFα blockers, tocilizumab, rituximab and abatacept) responded to baricitinib 4 mg/day (n=3) and tofacitinib 10 mg/day (n=1).7 Tofacitinib was also reported to be effective in an adult JIA patient with anterior uveitis and macular edema,8 a patient with scleritis and a patient with anterior and intermediate uveitis.9

Currently, a few ongoing clinical trials are evaluating the role of JAK inhibitors for non-infectious uveitis (NCT03580343, NCT04088409 and NCT03207815) but none exclusively addresses BU. Thus, future studies are expected to delineate the efficacy and safety profiles of different JAK inhibitors for refractory BU, which is indeed a devastating condition for both patients and physicians.

References

Footnotes

  • Handling editor Josef S Smolen

  • Contributors All authors equally contributed to the writing of the manuscript. CZ and WZ are the corresponding authors.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles