Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Is a human in vitro enthesitis model relevant to SpA-associated enthesitis? Response to: ‘Beware of wolves in sheep's clothing: immune cell plasticity and instability in health and disease’ by Alunno et al
Free
  1. Abdulla Watad1,2,3,
  2. Hannah Rowe3,
  3. Darren Newton4,
  4. Charlie Bridgewood3,
  5. Dennis G McGonagle3
  1. 1Internal Medicine B', Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
  2. 2Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
  3. 3Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine (LIRMM), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  4. 4Division of Haematology and Immunology, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Abdulla Watad, Internal Medicine B', Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer, Tel Hashomer 52621, Israel; watad.abdulla{at}gmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

We thank Alunno et al1 for their comments on our paper reporting on the isolation and preliminary characterisation of normal human enthesis CD4+ and CD8+ conventional T-cells.2 Our work showed that up to 2% of CD4+ T cells were Th17 in nature as demonstrated by intracellular flow cytometry. We were unable to identify FOXP3+ Tregs at the enthesis, but these were readily demonstrable in peripheral blood from the same patients. Alunno and colleagues1 point towards the transdifferentiation between Th17s and Tregs that may occur in vivo and which can be modulated by pivotal spondyloarthritis (SpA) associated cytokines including TNF. Our results were generated in an artificial ‘in vitro enthesitis’ model, and we agree with the comments by Alunno et al1 in regard to the role of TNF and other factors and that Th17/Treg plasticity will ultimately need to be addressed in tissue from patients with active SpA. While access to spinal entheseal tissue has been reported at one timepoint, we think that it would be technically very difficult to do this due to tissue inaccessibility from such sites for a second post-therapy biopsy.3 It would be possible to model the impact of TNF on our in vitro system using anti-CD3/CD28 stimulation and by either including or blocking TNF in the system. We also agree that the stroma, including mesenchymal stem cells, at the enthesis may play a very important role in regulating T-cell responses which are well defined for native stroma from bone but this has not been studied specifically at the enthesis thus far.4

Alunno and colleagues1 also point out that double negative (DN) CD3+ T cells could be responsible for IL-17A production and that this adds another layer of complexity to the analysis. DN CD3+ T cells include TCR γδ T-cells that have been previously reported to make IL-17A protein in entheseal tissue.5 The other significant population of DN T-cells are the TCR αβ CD3+ CD4- C8- T-cells that have been repeatedly linked to autoimmunity and inflammation but remain somewhat enigmatic. This DN T-cell population, as the authors pointed out, has been incriminated in psoriasis, which may be relevant to SpA. Given the technical difficultly in rapid tissue digestion and rapid sample preparation for functional studies, our work thus far has focused on the more abundant conventional T-cells but we agree that the role of TCR αβ CD3+ CD4 T-cells, both at the healthy enthesis and from diseased tissue, awaits elucidation including proinflammatory cytokine induction and production.

Finally, Alunno et al1 point to cells ex-Th17-cells that no longer produce IL-17 but produce IFN-γ, as emergent Th1-like lymphocytes that have recently been reported in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and that this could be important for disease pathology.6 This is an important point and raises the wider issue of the link between such populations in the synovium versus the enthesis and their putative microanatomical associations. It also raises questions pertaining to potential links between such resident populations in health. Further insight into these interactions will be possible after labelling specific T-cell populations followed by single-cell RNA sequencing, prestimulation and poststimulation with relevant cytokines. To conclude, we agree that the demonstration of a functional adaptive immune system, although with very preliminary characterisation, is key to understanding the enthesitis process in humans with respect to the local biomechanical environment.

References

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Handling editor Josef S Smolen

  • Correction notice This article has been corrected since it published Online First. The ORCID ID for Abdulla Watad has been corrected.

  • Contributors All authors drafted and approved the final version of the manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles