Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Response to: ‘Effectiveness and safety of ruxolitinib for the treatment of refractory systemic idiopathic juvenile arthritis like associated with interstitial lung disease: case report’ by Bader-Meunier et al
  1. Vivian E Saper1,
  2. Guangbo Chen2,
  3. Purvesh Khatri2,
  4. Elizabeth D Mellins3
  1. 1Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
  2. 2Institute for Immunity, Transplantation and Infection, Center for Biomedical Informatics, Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
  3. 3Department of Pediatrics, Program in Immunology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Elizabeth D Mellins, Department of Pediatrics, Program in Immunology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; mellins{at}stanford.edu

Statistics from Altmetric.com

We were very interested to read the correspondence from Dr Bader-Meunier and colleagues, who report a case of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) with associated lung disease.1 This case indeed matches the description of and provides further evidence for the striking and unusual clinical characteristics we recently detailed in an international case series of such patients.2 We thank the authors for this communication.

One aspect of particular importance in the reported case is the development of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DReSS), a delayed hypersensitivity reaction, to canakinumab (monoclonal antibody to interleukin (IL)-1β). As we noted, DReSS is a possibly under-recognised event preceding the clinical recognition or development of this lung disorder in at least a subset of patients.2 The authors’ correspondence, along with Drs Bader-Meunier and Povlika’s prior publication of two cases of probable DReSS in association with IL-1 inhibitors,3 highlights the need to consider this type of drug hypersensitivity.

Further studies will be required to evaluate the potential benefit of ruxolitinib for sJIA and lung disease and will be of considerable interest to clinicians caring for children with this condition. In addition, and importantly, removal of the IL-1 inhibitor in this case may also have contributed to the improved lung status. Early cessation of the suspect drug is a key to controlling DReSS progression, and DReSS can continue for a period of time subsequent to withdrawal of the causative medication.4 High-dose steroids, well-known to be efficacious in active sJIA, also may have provided broader clinical benefit,4 including for lung disease. Indeed, the apparent increased incidence of parenchymal lung disease in children with sJIA occurred concurrent with changes in sJIA management that typically involve reduced steroid use.2

The patient in this report showed increased expression of interferon (IFN)-stimulated genes during anti-IL-1 treatment, consistent with evidence that a subset of patients on cytokine inhibition for sJIA developed an IFN signature/heightened response.5 6 Together with the observation of elevated circulating Th1 cells, the findings raise the possibility that IFN-γ signalling is a target of ruxolitinib in this patient. There may be other targets, as the authors acknowledge. A role for IFN-γ in lung disease in sJIA has been proposed7 and requires more investigation. IFN-γ is strongly implicated in macrophage activation syndrome (MAS).8 9 In sJIA cases with the constellation of lung disease and unusual clinical features, we looked at the occurrence of MAS in relation to lung disease. We found that, whereas 33% had MAS before lung disease detection (most at disease onset and responsive to treatment), 78% had MAS at or during lung disease, 52% being overt MAS and 26% being subclinical (table 1). More research is needed to determine whether MAS in sJIA with lung disease is triggered by DReSS10 or by lung disease, or reflects the immune dysfunction that causes lung disease.

Table 1

MAS in relation to lung disease

Based on these observations, it is very difficult to assign the sources of improvement in this case with certainty. Nonetheless, as the authors suggest, further testing of the safety and effectiveness of ruxolitinib or other Janus kinase inhibitors in sJIA with lung disease appears warranted.

References

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Handling editor Josef S Smolen

  • Contributors VES, GC, PK and EDM all contributed to and agreed on the final version of this response to correspondence.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting or dissemination plans of this research.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles