Statistics from Altmetric.com
We have read with interest the article by Cohen-Aubart et al1 reporting the efficacy of infliximab in the treatment of Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD), a rare non-Langerhans histiocytosis. The anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor-α agent demonstrated a variable degree of efficacy, suggesting that infliximab might represent a therapeutic option for moderately severe ECD cases; similar results had been observed with anakinra.2 3 Nonetheless, following the identification of causative mutations along the mitogen-activated protein kinase(MAPK) pathway,4 severe forms of ECD are currently treated with targeted small molecule agents. Specifically, the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib and the MAPK or extracellular-signal regulated kinase (MEK) inhibitor cobimetinib have been successfully used to treat life-threatening forms of ECD. Although life-saving, these drugs are associated with severe toxicity, which often mandates treatment discontinuation.5 Here, we describe the efficacy and improved tolerability of combination therapy with interleukin-1 blockade and targeted MAPK inhibitors in the treatment of ECD.
Among 45 patients with a diagnosis of ECD and followed up at our institution, 25 have been treated with at least one targeted therapy (vemurafenib or cobimetinib). All patients underwent clinical evaluations every 3 months in order to assess treatment efficacy and safety; imaging restaging of disease activity and extension was performed every 6 months. Patient clinical and treatment characteristics are summarised in table 1. Sixteen patients were treated with vemurafenib, seven with cobimetinib and two were sequentially treated with vemurafenib and cobimetinib, with the former also receiving a second vemurafenib course after the discontinuation of the MEK inhibitor. Cobimetinib and vemurafenib were successful in controlling disease progression and improving clinical manifestations in all patients. However, treatment had to be discontinued in eight cases (29%); adverse reactions to vemurafenib and cobimetinib were the only cause of treatment discontinuation.
We hypothesised that combination therapy with anakinra might effectively dampen the toxicity related to MAPK pathway inhibition, thus preventing discontinuation of these life-saving drugs. Seven patients from our cohort were treated with a combination therapy including anakinra. In two of these cases, anakinra was initiated following the development of a severe inflammatory adverse event induced by MAPK inhibition. Specifically, one patient with severe ECD sequentially received vemurafenib and cobimetinib; however, treatment with both MAPK inhibitors yielded a severe systemic inflammatory reaction (fever, elevation of acute phase reactants), which mandated discontinuation. Subsequent initiation of anakinra in addition to vemurafenib effectively controlled systemic inflammation. Another patient developed myocarditis while on vemurafenib; he received anakinra as an add-on therapy, which prompted resolution of cardiac inflammation. In both cases, combination therapy with anakinra proved effective and well tolerated. Most importantly, it enabled retention of life-saving treatment regimens with MAPK inhibitors.
A previous study indicated that combination therapy with anakinra and MAPK pathway inhibitors in ECD might result in incremental efficacy.6 The present study indicates that anakinra can effectively control and may prevent MAPK inhibitor-related adverse events. Thereby, combination therapy with anakinra might prevent discontinuation and increase retention of life-saving therapies with MAPK inhibitors, especially in the case of inflammation-mediated reactions. Combinatorial approaches might potentially encompass other cytokine-blocking agents, including infliximab.1 However, anakinra might represent a particularly suitable add-on therapy, given an excellent record of safety and a short half-life of 6 hours, which allows for prompt treatment discontinuation on resolution of the adverse events.
CC and GC contributed equally.
Contributors Conception and design: CC, GC, NF. Generation of clinical data: CC, GC, AT, GDL, LD. Analysis and interpretation of data: CC, GC, NF. Drafting of the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content: CC, GC, NF, AT. Final approval of the submitted manuscript: CC, GC, NF, AT, GDL, LD.
Funding GC has received funding from AIRC under MFAG 2018-ID 22136 project.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.