Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Do the salivary glands of patients with systemic sclerosis show ultrasonographic modifications suggestive of Sjögren's syndrome?
  1. Marion Couderc1,
  2. Anne Tournadre1,
  3. Sylvain Mathieu1,
  4. Bruno Pereira2,
  5. Martin Soubrier1,
  6. Jean Jacques Dubost1
  1. 1Rheumatology, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
  2. 2DRCI Biostatistical department, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France
  1. Correspondence to Mrs Marion Couderc, Rheumatology, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand 63000, France; mcouderc{at}chu-clermontferrand.fr

Statistics from Altmetric.com

The paper by Ferdowsi et al, reported a 23-item composite damage index to quantify organ damage in systemic sclerosis (SSc).1 In this index, sicca symptoms (item 3) play an important role (weight score=3). Actually, sicca symptoms are frequently reported by patients with SSc (7.5%–68%) and could be due to a fibrosis process of the salivary glands (SGs).2–4 In recent years, ultrasonography (US) of the parotid and submandibular glands has been widely used for identifying SG modifications in patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS). In order to assess modifications in the SG echostructure in patients with SSc and compare them with those of patients with pSS or controls with sicca symptoms, we prospectively enrolled patients with SSc fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) 2013 classification criteria, patients with pSS according to the ACR/EULAR 2016 classification criteria, and controls with sicca symptoms. Bilateral parotid and submandibular ultrasound was performed on every patient by the same operator (MC) blinded to the diagnosis. The inhomogeneity of each of the four major SGs in B-mode was graded using the Cornec et al scoring system (scale of 0 to 4) as previously described.5 The highest grade among the four glands was suggestive of Sjögren’s syndrome if ≥2.

A total of 108 patients were included in the study: SSc (n=25), pSS (n=48) and controls (n=35). The characteristics of the patients are shown in table 1. When comparing the pSS and controls, the performance of an US echostructure grade ≥2 for the diagnosis of pSS was good (sensitivity: 75%, specificity: 91.4%, positive predictive value: 92.3%, negative predictive value: 72.7%). Among the 25 patients with SSc, 9 had a history of or had a current digital ulcer, 8 had interstitial lung disease, 6 received an immunosuppressant (methotrexate (n=4), mycophenolate mofetil (n=2)), 2 received hydroxychloroquine, and 5 received glucocorticoids (all at a daily dose ≤10 mg), 40% complained of xerostomia and 36% of xerophthalmia, Schirmer’s test was ≤5 mm in 5 min in 9/17 (53%), and 8/17 (47.1%) had an unstimulated salivary flow ≤0.1 mL/minute. The lengths of parotid and submandibular glands were smaller in patients with SSc versus controls after adjustemnt for age and sex (p=0.02 and p=0.04, respectively). In the SSc group, 7 (28%) had a salivary gland ultrasound (SGUS) grade ≥2 (n=5, grade 3; n=2, grade 4). Five (71%) of the 7 patients with SSc with SGUS grade ≥2 were anticentromere antibody (ACA)-positive compared with 4/18 (22%) patients with SSc with SGUS scores of 0–1 (p=0.02). None of these seven patients with US abnormalities suggestive of pSS had anti-Ro 60/SSA or La/SSB antibodies.

Table 1

Clinical and biological characteristics of the patients

To date, this is the first study assessing morphological echostructure modifications of the major SGs in patients with SSc. According to our results, more than a quarter of patients with SSc, especially those with ACA, had inhomogeneity of the parotid and submandibular parenchyma that is evocative of pSS. We cannot exclude that the SGUS inhomogeneity is a SSc-related manifestation, especially in patients with SSc with ACA. These observations could more probably represent a distinct ACA-positive SSc/Sjögrenoverlap syndrome, as previously described, that salivary gland ultrasound could identify in a simple and non-invasive way.6

References

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Contributors MC: conception and design of the work, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting the work, revising and final approval. AT: contribution to the conception and interpretation of the data, revising and final approval. SM: contribution to the conception and interpretation of the data, revising and final approval. BP: contribution to the conception, statistical analysis and interpretation of the data, revising and final approval. MS: contribution to the conception and interpretation of the data, revising and final approval. JJD: conception and design of the work, interpretation of the data, drafting the work, revising and final approval.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Ethics approval French CPP n°AU1292-07/10/2016, ANSM n°2016-A01256-45.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.