Objectives Patients with autoantibody-positive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are less likely to experience pregnancy-induced improvement of RA disease activity (DAS28-C reactive protein (CRP)) compared with patients with autoantibody-negative RA. Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) are the most specific autoantibodies for RA. We previously demonstrated that disease improvement is associated with changes in total IgG glycosylation, which regulate antibody effector function. Therefore, we sought to analyse the ACPA-IgG glycosylation profile during pregnancy with the aim to understand the lower change of pregnancy-induced improvement of the disease in patients with autoantibody-positive RA.
Methods ACPA-IgGs were purified from ACPA-positive patient sera (n=112) of the Pregnancy-induced Amelioration of Rheumatoid Arthritis cohort, a prospective study designed to investigate pregnancy-associated improvement of RA. The fragment crystallisable (Fc)glycosylation profile of ACPA-IgGs was characterised by mass spectrometry and compared with that of total IgG derived from the same patients or from ACPA-negative patients.
Results All ACPA-IgG subclasses display significant changes in the level of galactosylation and sialylation during pregnancy, although less pronounced than in total IgG. The pregnancy-induced increase in ACPA-IgG galactosylation, but not sialylation, associates with lower DAS28-CRP. In ACPA-positive patients, no such association was found with changes in the galactosylation of total IgG, whereas in ACPA-negative patients changes in disease activity correlated well with changes in the galactosylation of total IgG.
Conclusions In ACPA-positive RA, the pregnancy-induced change in galactosylation of ACPA-IgG, and not that of total IgG, associates with changes in disease activity. These data may indicate that in ACPA-positive patients the galactosylation of ACPA-IgG is of more pathogenic relevance than that of total IgG.
- rheumatoid arthritis
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Handling editor Josef S Smolen
Contributors AB, JMWH, MW and RJEMD designed the study. AB, LH, DF and YR were involved in sample preparation and processing. AB, LH, TMK, MW and RJEMD conducted statistical analyses and interpreted the results. AB, LH, JMWH, MW and RJEMD drafted the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript and gave their approval for submission.
Funding AB was funded by the Dutch Arthritis Foundation (NR 10-1-411) and by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Program (FP7-Health-F5-2011) under grant agreement no. 278535 (HighGlycan). LH was supported by the Dutch Arthritis Foundation (NR 12-2-403). YR was supported by a Boehringer Ingelheim funded project within BeTheCure and by NWO (435000033).
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Obtained.
Ethics approval The study was in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration and was approved by the Ethics Review Board at the Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.