Article Text

other Versions

Responsiveness of patient reported outcomes including fatigue, sleep quality and activity limitation and quality of life following treatment with abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
  1. George A Wells (gawells{at}
  1. University of Ottawa, Canada
    1. Tracy Li ({at}
    1. Bristol-Myers Squibb, United States
      1. Lara Maxwell (lmaxwell{at}
      1. University of Ottawa, Canada
        1. Ross Maclean (ross.maclean{at}
        1. Bristol-Myers Squibb, United States
          1. Peter Tugwell (elacasse{at}
          1. University of Ottawa, Canada


            Objective: To evaluate the responsiveness of patient reported outcomes (PROs) including fatigue, sleep, activity limitation, and quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.

            Methods: Data were considered from a randomized controlled trial comparing abatacept (n=258) to placebo (n=133) on a background of DMARD therapy in RA patients who were anti-TNF therapy inadequate responders (ATTAIN study). PROs assessed included SF-36, activity limitation, fatigue and sleep. For each outcome the treatment difference, relative percent improvement, standardized resonse mean (SRM) and relative efficiency (RE) for assessing an outcome's ability to detect a treatment effect relative to tender joint count (TJC) were calculated. A RE >1 suggests a measure is more efficient than TJC in detecting treatment effect.

            Results: Moderate to large SRMs (≥ 0.6) were observed for the PRO measures. In particular, SRMs (95% CI) were: physician global 0.72 (0.51, 0.94); HAQ 0.63 (0.42, 0.85); SF36 physical component score 0.62 (0.40, 0.83); SF36 bodily pain 0.68 (0.46, 0.90); and fatigue 0.59 (0.38, 0.81). REs for physician global (1.6), SF36 bodily pain domain (1.4), pain intensity (1.4), HAQ (1.2), SF36 physical component score (1.2), fatigue (1.1) and patient global assessment (1.04) were all more responsive than TJC. The SF36 mental component score (0.3), swollen joint count (0.6), activity limitation (0.8), sleep (0.7) and CRP (0.9) were less responsive.

            Conclusions: Using PROs for evaluating therapies for RA patients can detect improvements and will identify changes that are important to patients. In general, physical assessments are more responsive to an effective treatment than mental assessments.

            • Fatigue
            • Patient Reported Outcomes
            • Quality of Life
            • Rheumatoid Arthritis
            • Sleep

            Statistics from

            Request Permissions

            If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.