Objective: To assess the reliability of SLEDAI-2000 index in routine practice and its ability to capture disease activity as compared to BILAG-2004 index.
Methods: SLE patients from 11 centres were assessed by 2 raters separately in routine practice. Disease activity was assessed using BILAG-2004 and SLEDAI-2000 indices. Level of agreement for items was used to assess the reliability of SLEDAI-2000. Ability to detect disease activity was assessed by determining the number of patients with high activity on BILAG-2004 (overall score A or B) but low SLEDAI-2000 score (< 6) and number of patients with low activity on BILAG-2004 (overall score C, D or E) but high SLEDAI-2000 score (≥ 6). Treatment of these patients were analysed and increase in therapy was used as the gold standard for active disease.
Results: 93 patients (90.3% women, 69.9% Caucasian) were studied: mean age 43.8 years, mean disease duration 10 years. There were 43 patients (46.2%) with a difference in SLEDAI-2000 score between the 2 raters and this difference was ≥ 4 in 19 patients (20.4%). Agreement for each of the items in SLEDAI-2000 was between 81.7 - 100%. 35 patients (37.6%) had high activity on BILAG-2004 but low SLEDAI-2000 score, of which 48.6% had therapy increased. There were only 5 patients (5.4%) with low activity on BILAG-2004 but high SLEDAI-2000 score.
Conclusions: SLEDAI-2000 is a reliable index to assess SLE disease activity but it is less able to detect active disease requiring increased therapy than BILAG-2004 index.
- disease activity
- inter-rater reliability
- systemic lupus erythematosus
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.