Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Assessment of the clinically relevant change in pain for patients with sciatica
  1. B Giraudeau1,
  2. S Rozenberg2,
  3. J-P Valat3
  1. 1INSERM CIC202, Faculté de Médecine, Tours, France
  2. 2Service de Rhumatologie, CHU de La Pitié, Paris, France
  3. 3Service de Rhumatologie, CHU, Tours, France
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr B Giraudeau
    INSERM CIC202, Faculté de Médecine, 2bis Bd Tonnellé, 37032 Tours cedex, France; giraudeaumed.univ-tours.fr

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

The visual analogue scale (VAS) is widely used for pain assessment. However, the minimum clinically relevant change remains a debated question, even with regard to the method of assessment. On the one hand, considering intra-individual change in acute pain, Todd et al suggested a crude change of 13 mm (for a 100 mm VAS) to discriminate between reporting a little less or a little more pain.1 In the study of Farrar et al the best cut off points were estimated at −20 mm (for a crude change) or −33% (for a relative change) to best discriminate between patients who require a rescue opioid dose or not.2 Similar results were also derived when considering patient self appreciation of improvement in chronic pain.3 On the other hand, Redelmeier et al suggested focusing on interindividual change …

View Full Text