Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Globally, there has been a growing interest in addressing gender disparities in leadership positions within rheumatology,1 editorial boards of rheumatology journals,2 conference speakers3 and authorship of research publications and guidelines.4 5 The causes of gender disparity in rheumatology are complex and multifactorial, including an interplay of historically late entrance of a larger number of women into medicine only in the second half of the 20th century, social and professional gender norms, organisational gender climate, unconscious gender bias, gender discrimination and a scarcity of senior female mentors and role models.6
Professional awards serve important functions in recognising exemplary individuals who uphold the values and objectives cherished by award-granting institutions.7 Unlike monetary remuneration directly linked to financial incentives, symbolic awards are tied predominantly to intangible social and professional gains afforded by prestige and eminence. Under certain conditions, awards can galvanise motivation and amplify performance.8 Therefore, professional awards can promote the values of equity, elevate social and professional standing of awardees, and increase the pool of senior role models.
To explore gender equity in rheumatology awards globally, we undertook a cross-sectional analysis of publicly available online data …
Footnotes
Handling editor Josef S Smolen
X @debaditya_roy, @lauraandreoli80, @anaarredondo8, @LatikaGupta_
Correction notice This article has been corrected since it published Online First. The author correspondence details have been updated.
Contributors Conceptualisation and visualisation: LG and LA. Data curation: all authors. Formal analysis: DR and LG. Methods: PVO and LG. Investigation: all authors. Writing of the original draft: DR and LG. Writing, review and editing: all authors. Supervision: LG. Project administration: LG and LA.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Map disclaimer The inclusion of any map (including the depiction of any boundaries there), or of any geographical or locational reference, does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of BMJ concerning the legal status of any country, territory, jurisdiction or area or its authorities. Any such expression remains solely that of the relevant source and is not endorsed by BMJ. Maps are provided without any warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.