Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Identifying the association between serum urate levels and gout flares in patients taking urate-lowering therapy: a post hoc cohort analysis of the CARES trial with consideration of dropout
  1. Sara K Tedeschi1,
  2. Keigo Hayashi1,
  3. Yuqing Zhang2,
  4. Hyon Choi2,
  5. Daniel H Solomon1
  1. 1 Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  2. 2 Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Sara K Tedeschi; stedeschi1{at}bwh.harvard.edu

Abstract

Objective To investigate gout flare rates based on repeated serum urate (SU) measurements in a randomised controlled trial of urate-lowering therapy (ULT), accounting for dropout and death.

Methods We performed a secondary analysis using data from Cardiovascular Safety of Febuxostat or Allopurinol in Patients with Gout, which randomised participants to febuxostat or allopurinol, titrated to target SU <6 mg/dL with flare prophylaxis for 6 months. SU was categorised as ≤3.9, 4.0–5.9, 6.0–7.9, 8.0–9.9 or ≥ 10 mg/dL at each 3–6 month follow-up. The primary outcome was gout flare. Poisson regression models, adjusted for covariates and factors related to participant retention versus dropout, estimated gout flare incidence rate ratios by time-varying SU category.

Results Among 6183 participants, the median age was 65 years and 84% were male. Peak gout flare rates for all SU categories were observed in months 0–6, coinciding with the initiation of ULT and months 6–12 after stopping prophylaxis. Flare rates were similar across SU groups in the initial year of ULT. During months 36–72, a dose–response relationship was observed between the SU category and flare rate. Lower flare rates were observed when SU ≤3.9 mg/dL and greater rates when SU ≥10 mg/dL, compared with SU 4.0–5.9 mg/dL (p for trend <0.01).

Conclusion Gout flare rates were persistently higher when SU ≥6 mg/dL after the first year of ULT after accounting for censoring. The spike in flares in all categories after stopping prophylaxis suggests a longer duration of prophylaxis may be warranted.

  • Gout
  • Crystal arthropathies
  • Arthritis

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request. This publication is based on research using data from data contributors Takeda that has been made available through Vivli.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request. This publication is based on research using data from data contributors Takeda that has been made available through Vivli.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Handling editor Josef S Smolen

  • Contributors SKT, DHS, YZ and HC conceived the study and contributed to study design. KH performed data analyses. All authors contributed to data interpretation. SKT drafted the manuscript and all authors provided critical feedback and approved the final version of the manuscript. SKT is the guarantor and accepts full responsibility for the work, had access to the data and controlled the decision to publish.

  • Funding National Institutes of Health (K23 AR075070 (Tedeschi), L30 AR070514 (Tedeschi), R03 AR081309 (Tedeschi), P30 AR072577 (Solomon).

  • Competing interests SKT: consulting fees for Novartis and Avalo Therapeutics. HC: research grants from Horizon; service on a board or committee for LG Chem, Shanton and ANI Pharmaceuticals. DHS: research grants from CorEvitas, Janssen, Moderna and Novartis. Royalties from UpToDate. KH and YZ: no competing interests reported.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.