Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Response to: ‘Correspondence on ‘Safety and efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation for active peripheral psoriatic arthritis: an exploratory randomised placebo-controlled trial’’ by McGonagle et al
  1. Maja Skov Kragsnaes1,2,
  2. Jens Kjeldsen2,3,
  3. Hans Christian Horn1,
  4. Heidi Lausten Munk1,
  5. Jens Kristian Pedersen4,
  6. Søren Andreas Just4,
  7. Palle Ahlquist5,
  8. Jesper Rømhild Davidsen2,6,
  9. Anna Christine Nilsson7,
  10. Richard Röttger8,
  11. Mogens Kruhøffer9,
  12. Julian R Marchesi10,
  13. Karsten Kristiansen11,12,
  14. Robin Christensen2,13,
  15. Torkell Ellingsen1,2
  1. 1 Rheumatology Research Unit, Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
  2. 2 Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
  3. 3 Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
  4. 4 Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Svendborg Hospital, Svendborg, Denmark
  5. 5 Reumaklinik Fyn, Odense, Denmark
  6. 6 South Danish Center for Interstitial Lung Diseases, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
  7. 7 Department of Clinical Immunology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
  8. 8 Department of Mathematics and Computer Science (IMADA), University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
  9. 9 BioXpedia, Aarhus, Denmark
  10. 10 Division of Digestive Diseases, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK
  11. 11 Laboratory of Genomics and Molecular Biomedicine, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  12. 12 Institute of Metagenomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
  13. 13 Section for Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Research, the Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
  1. Correspondence to Professor Torkell Ellingsen, Rheumatology Research Unit, Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark; torkell.ellingsen{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

We thank McGonagle et al 1 for their insightful comments on our manuscript on faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in active peripheral psoriatic arthritis (PsA), known as the FLORA trial.2 We agree that the clinical findings of this first double-blind, randomised, trial of FMT in immune-mediated arthritis warrant further investigation into the underlying biological mechanisms coupling gut composition, the intestinal barrier–microbiotal interaction, and systemic inflammation in PsA and related chronic inflammatory diseases. Indeed, evidence linking the composition of the gut microbiota and initiation/progression of immune-mediated disease is limited and is primarily derived from animal models.3 Suggested mechanisms encompass failure to induce immunological tolerance,4 which may direct the T cell repertoire towards a pro-inflammatory phenotype including Th17 differentiation and activation seen in PsA, loss of epithelial integrity5 and systemic translocation due to local inflammation and/or tissue damage that may enable trafficking of both activated immune cells and antigenic material to distant sites thereby creating perpetual systemic inflammatory stimuli6 by epitope spreading,7 bystander activation8 and/or molecular mimicry.9

Reactive arthritis (ReA) represents an arthritic disease entity within the spondyloarthritis (SpA) family that is believed to be triggered by a specific gut bacteria composition. Moreover, the heterogeneous disease manifestations of ReA such as enthesitis, uveitis and sacroiliitis have been associated with enrichment of specific bacteria.10 Given the overlapping disease manifestations of PsA and ReA, these disease entities may likely share pathophysiological features. As McGonagle et al point out, FMT could transiently disturb the intestinal homeostasis and trigger a flare in disease mediated by microbial modulation of immunological pathways before later restoration of immune homeostasis. That FMT can induce systemic immunological responses such as a transient increase in C reactive protein and self-limiting fever are well-known side-effects in patients receiving FMT for Clostridioides difficile infection and/or chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).11 Effects of FMT could also be mediated through indirect mechanisms bolstering the effects of standard therapies, including methotrexate, which participants of the FLORA trial received throughout the trial. This latter concept is known as pharmacomicrobiomics.12 Given that compositional and functional microbiota alterations can be partly relieved by conventional synthetic disease modifying anti rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) treatment13 and anti-tumour necrosis alfa (TNFα) treatment in patients with SpA and rheumatoid arthritis (RA),14 15 it would have been optimal that no participants in the FLORA trial received such treatments during the trial. However, this state was not possible due to disease severity and the relatively long follow-up (26 weeks).

In addition to the clinical objectives of the FLORA trial, we aimed to generate more knowledge of FMT-induced (1) changes in the compositional, structural and functional capacity of the intestinal microbiota and the intestinal permeability, (2) occurrence of systemic translocation of microbial products and (3) changes in levels of systemic inflammation-associated proteins in patients with PsA, and how this relate to the clinical outcome following FMT both in the short term (after 4 weeks) and in the long term (after 26 weeks). Current evidence from IBD trials indicates that both clinical, patient-related and donor-related factors may be important for the clinical outcome of FMT,16–20 thereby leading us to conclude that FMT therapies would benefit from a personalised approach.21 Moreover, whether a ‘window of opportunity’ exists relatively close to disease onset22 or at time of disease remission within which microbiota-targeted interventions are more likely to be effective needs further investigation.

The proposed causal link between microbiota community state types and PsA, which has been proven to be the case in ReA, remains to be established. However, to investigate safety and efficacy of FMT as well as enlighten similarities and differences in microbial abnormalities and FMT effect mechanisms among patients with different types of inflammatory arthritis (PsA, ReA, RA, axial SpA, gouty arthritis), IBD and pulmonary sarcoidosis, we have now initiated a new randomised trial, the FRONT trial (NCT04924270). Here, we will investigate the clinical and biological effects of weekly upper-administered, capsule FMT in treatment naïve, newly diagnosed patients with various conditions. As advocated for by translational science, we anticipate that the combination of clinical trials and in-depth basic science of microbial and immunological responses will advance our understanding of the link between the intestinal microbiota and the disease course of PsA and related chronic inflammatory diseases.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication



  • Handling editor Josef S Smolen

  • Twitter @JustSoren

  • Correction notice This article has been corrected since it published Online First. Reference 1 has been corrected.

  • Contributors All the authors have contributed to writing and reviewing the final draft.

  • Funding JRM receives financial and infrastructure support from the NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) based at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and Imperial College London; NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre [RDA02]; National Institute for Health Research [CL-2019-21-002].

  • Disclaimer All the other the authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests JRM has received a paid consultancy from Enterobiotix Ltd.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles