Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Response to: ‘Correspondence on ‘Cardiovascular effects of biological versus conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy in treatment-naive, early rheumatoid arthritis’’ by Georgiadis et al
  1. Sven Plein1,
  2. Maya H Buch2,3,4
  1. 1 Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre (MCRC) & Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  2. 2 Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  3. 3 Division of Musculoskeletal & Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
  4. 4 NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Maya H Buch, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds LS7 4SA, UK; maya.buch{at}manchester.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

We thank Athanasios et al for their interest in our original report entitled, ‘Cardiovascular effects of biological versus conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy in treatment-naive, early rheumatoid arthritis.1

Athanasios et al state that the findings of cardiovascular (CV) abnormalities in patients with new onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA) reported in the Coronary Artery Disease Evaluation in Rheumatoid Arthritis (CADERA) study are not surprising. While we agree that other studies, including the report by Athanasios that is quoted in the letter describe changes in early RA, there are no prospective randomised controlled trials of CV manifestations in very early RA cohorts. The trial cohort underpinning the ‘CADERA’ study had a median symptom duration of 20 weeks, with no history of CV disease (CVD) and a maximum of one traditional risk factor excluding diabetes mellitus. The results of …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Handling editor Josef S Smolen

  • Contributors MHB drafted the response with critical input from SP.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles