Article Text

Bimekizumab treatment in biologic DMARD-naïve patients with active psoriatic arthritis: 52-week efficacy and safety results from the phase III, randomised, placebo-controlled, active reference BE OPTIMAL study
  1. Christopher T Ritchlin1,
  2. Laura C Coates2,
  3. Iain B McInnes3,
  4. Philip J Mease4,
  5. Joseph F Merola5,6,
  6. Yoshiya Tanaka7,
  7. Akihiko Asahina8,
  8. Laure Gossec9,10,
  9. Alice B Gottlieb11,
  10. Richard B Warren12,13,
  11. Barbara Ink14,
  12. Rajan Bajracharya14,
  13. Vishvesh Shende14,
  14. Jason Coarse15,
  15. Robert BM Landewé16,17
  1. 1Allergy, Immunology & Rheumatology Division, University of Rochester Medical School, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
  2. 2Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford and Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
  3. 3College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
  4. 4Swedish Medical Center and Providence St. Joseph Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
  5. 5Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  6. 6Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  7. 7First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Fukoka, Japan
  8. 8Department of Dermatology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  9. 9INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
  10. 10AP-HP, Rheumatology Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
  11. 11Department of Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
  12. 12Dermatology Centre, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
  13. 13NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
  14. 14UCB Pharma, Slough, UK
  15. 15UCB Pharma, Morrisville, North Carolina, USA
  16. 16Amsterdam Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  17. 17Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to Dr Christopher T Ritchlin, University of Rochester Medical School, Allergy, Immunology & Rheumatology Division, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642, USA; christopher_ritchlin{at}urmc.rochester.edu

Abstract

Objectives Bimekizumab (BKZ) is a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin (IL)-17F in addition to IL-17A. BKZ treatment has demonstrated superior efficacy versus placebo (PBO) at Week 16 in biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-naïve patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Here, we report long-term efficacy and safety to Week 52.

Methods BE OPTIMAL comprised a 16-week, double-blind, PBO-controlled period, then 36 weeks treatment-blind. Patients were randomised 3:2:1 to subcutaneous BKZ 160 mg every 4 weeks, PBO with switch to BKZ at Week 16, or reference arm (adalimumab (ADA) 40 mg every 2 weeks). Efficacy outcomes included the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria 20/50/70, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75/90/100 in patients with baseline psoriasis affecting ≥3% body surface area and minimal disease activity (MDA); non-responder imputation.

Results ACR20/50/70, PASI75/90/100 and MDA responses were sustained with BKZ to Week 52, consistent with results observed at Week 16. Patients who switched to BKZ at Week 16 demonstrated improvements in efficacy with similar results to BKZ-randomised patients by Week 52.

To Week 52, 555/702 (79.1%) patients had ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) during BKZ treatment; 113/140 (80.7%) on ADA. On BKZ, 46 (6.6%) patients had serious TEAEs. 54 (7.7%) Candida infections occurred during BKZ treatment and 1 (0.7%) during ADA; all cases were localised and non-serious. One death occurred in a BKZ-treated patient, unrelated to treatment.

Conclusions The efficacy of BKZ in bDMARD-naïve patients with PsA was sustained from Week 16 to Week 52. BKZ was well tolerated with no new safety signals observed.

Trial registration number NCT03895203.

  • psoriatic arthritis
  • arthritis, psoriatic
  • biological therapy

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request. Data from this manuscript may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the USA and/or Europe, or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion. Investigators may request access to anonymised individual patient data and redacted study documents which may include: raw datasets, analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, blank case report form, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.Vivli.org and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a prespecified time, typically 12 months, on a password-protected portal.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Video Abstract

Disclaimer: this video summarises a scientific article published by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ). The content of this video has not been peer-reviewed and does not constitute medical advice. Any opinions expressed are solely those of the contributors. Viewers should be aware that professionals in the field may have different opinions. BMJ does not endorse any opinions expressed or recommendations discussed. Viewers should not use the content of the video as the basis for any medical treatment. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content.

What is already known on this topic

  • Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic, inflammatory disease that is associated with clinical manifestations across joint and skin domains that can negatively impact quality of life.

  • Bimekizumab (BKZ) is a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin (IL)-17F in addition to IL-17A.

  • Primary results from two phase III studies of BKZ treatment in patients with PsA who were biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-naïve (bDMARD-naïve; BE OPTIMAL) or who had a previous inadequate response or intolerance to tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors (BE COMPLETE) demonstrated a similar magnitude of response in both patient populations at Week 16.

  • PsA is a chronic, long-term disease, therefore it is important to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of new treatment options for PsA.

What this study adds

  • The 52-week randomised controlled trial BE OPTIMAL assessed the long-term efficacy of BKZ across joint, skin, enthesitis, dactylitis and radiographic outcomes.

  • Improvements in joint, skin clearance and composite outcomes observed at Week 16 were sustained to Week 52 in patients initially randomised to BKZ, with over half of BKZ-treated patients achieving American College of Rheumatology response criteria ≥50% improvement, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100% improvement or minimal disease activity by Week 52.

  • For patients who switched from placebo to BKZ at Week 16, improvements in efficacy were similar to those initially randomised to BKZ across joint and skin outcomes at Week 52.

  • The overall safety profile was consistent with the known safety of BKZ, including higher rates of mucocutaneous Candida infections when compared with adalimumab (ADA).

How this study might affect research, practice or policy

  • Results to Week 52 from BE OPTIMAL suggest that BKZ is an effective long-term treatment option in bDMARD-naïve patients with active PsA.

  • Data from the ongoing open-label extension, BE VITAL, will assess the safety and efficacy of BKZ treatment to three years.

Introduction

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic, inflammatory disease that develops in up to 30% of patients with psoriasis, and is associated with a diverse range of clinical features that result in a significant patient burden and reduced quality of life.1–5

Interleukins (IL)-17A and IL-17F have been identified as independent pivotal drivers of joint and skin inflammation in PsA.1 2 IL-17A inhibitors, such as secukinumab and ixekizumab, are currently available and are established therapies shown to be effective treatment options for patients with PsA.6 7 However, inhibition of both IL-17A and IL-17F could be a more effective treatment strategy, as in vitro, dual neutralisation of IL-17A and IL-17F is more effective in reducing inflammation than neutralising IL-17A alone.8 Bimekizumab (BKZ) is a humanised monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits IL-17F in addition to IL-17A.9 The benefits of dual neutralisation were demonstrated clinically in a phase IIIb clinical trial in psoriasis, where skin clearance was significantly higher with BKZ when compared with secukinumab.6 This strategy may also achieve greater disease control and alleviation of symptoms of inflammatory diseases like PsA, in which both IL-17A and IL-17F are implicated as major effector cytokines.8

The efficacy and safety of BKZ was previously reported up to two years in multiple phase III studies in patients with plaque psoriasis,6 10–12 and in patients with PsA to Week 24 and Week 16 in two phase III studies: BE OPTIMAL and BE COMPLETE, respectively.13 14 BE OPTIMAL included patients with active PsA who were biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD)-naïve; BE COMPLETE included patients with active PsA who had previous inadequate response or intolerance to tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNFi-IR). BE OPTIMAL also included an adalimumab (ADA) reference arm. BKZ demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements across joint, skin clearance, composite and patient-reported outcomes in the respective populations to Week 16 in both studies. BKZ also demonstrated inhibition of structural progression to Week 16 in BE OPTIMAL.13 Safety results were similar to those reported in previous studies of BKZ in psoriasis.6 10 11

PsA is a chronic, long-term disease,15 16 therefore treatment options that provide inflammation control and long-term, durable efficacy and tolerability are needed. Treatment should aim to achieve the lowest possible level of disease activity across domains,4 assessed using more stringent disease measures such as American College of Rheumatology response criteria (ACR) ≥50% improvement, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 100% improvement and minimal disease activity (MDA). Data from BE OPTIMAL to Week 24 were reported in the primary manuscript.13 Here, we report the long-term clinical efficacy and safety of subcutaneous BKZ 160 mg every 4 weeks in adult, bDMARD-naïve patients with active PsA to 52 weeks: the final results of the phase III BE OPTIMAL study.

Methods

Study design and participants

Complete methods details are reported in the primary manuscript.13 In brief, BE OPTIMAL (NCT03895203; ClinicalTrials.gov) was a 52-week, phase III, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled, active reference (ADA) study. The study was conducted in Asia, Eastern Europe, Western Europe and North America, and consisted of a 2–5 week screening period, a 16-week PBO-controlled, double-blind treatment period and a 36-week active treatment-blind period. BE OPTIMAL included an active reference (ADA) arm to provide a reference for the benefit-risk profile of BKZ alongside a standard-of-care treatment. This arm was not powered for statistical comparison to BKZ or PBO.

Patients completing Week 52 and meeting eligibility criteria were eligible for enrolment in the ongoing open-label extension (OLE) study BE VITAL (NCT04009499; ClinicalTrials.gov). A safety follow-up was conducted 20 weeks after the last dose of BKZ for patients not entering the OLE, or who discontinued early (online supplemental figure 1).

Supplemental material

Patients

Full inclusion and exclusion criteria were reported previously.13 In brief, eligible patients were ≥18 years and had a documented diagnosis of adult-onset PsA meeting the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis for ≥6 months prior to screening. Patients had active PsA with a tender joint count (TJC) ≥3 (of 68), swollen joint count (SJC) ≥3 (of 66) and ≥1 active psoriatic lesion and/or a documented psoriasis history. Patients with current or prior exposure to any biologics for the treatment of PsA or psoriasis were excluded.

Randomisation and masking

Patients were randomised 3:2:1 to receive subcutaneous BKZ 160 mg every 4 weeks, subcutaneous PBO every 2 weeks or the reference (subcutaneous ADA 40 mg every 2 weeks). At Week 16, patients initially randomised to PBO were reallocated to receive subcutaneous BKZ 160 mg every 4 weeks through to Week 52 (PBO/BKZ); patients initially randomised to BKZ or ADA continued their dosing to Week 52. Due to the different dosing schedules, BKZ-treated patients received PBO between BKZ doses to match the reference arm dosing schedule (double-dummy) and maintain treatment blinding up to Week 52.

Study procedures

Study visits occurred every 2 weeks. Efficacy was assessed at baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 36 and 52. Safety was assessed at baseline and each study visit thereafter. Structural damage progression in the hands and feet was assessed on plain radiographs, using the van der Heijde modified Total Sharp Score (vdHmTSS), quantifying the extent of bone erosions and joint space narrowing. Hand and feet radiographs were taken at screening, Week 16 and Week 52. These were read centrally and independently by two experienced readers, who were blind to the treatment assignment and time course of the films.

From Week 16 onwards, non-responder patients as per investigator assessment were eligible for rescue therapy with prespecified background medications. Patients requiring rescue therapy continued their assigned treatment. Further details are in the primary manuscript.13

Outcomes

Clinical efficacy outcomes assessed through Week 52 included ACR20/50/70, PASI75/90/100 (in patients with psoriasis affecting ≥3% body surface area (BSA) at baseline), MDA and very low disease activity (VLDA; achieved if 5/7 or 7/7 of the following criteria were fulfilled, respectively: TJC ≤1, SJC ≤1, BSA ≤3%, patients’ pain visual analogue scale (VAS) ≤15, patient’s global assessment of arthritis VAS ≤20, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ≤0.5, tender entheseal points ≤1), ACR50+PASI100 (in patients with psoriasis affecting ≥3% BSA at baseline), radiographic endpoints (vdHmTSS, bone erosion, joint space narrowing and proportion of patients with no radiographic inhibition (vdHmTSS change from baseline (CfB) ≤0.5); radiographic set), enthesitis (in patients with enthesitis at baseline using the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI)), dactylitis (in patients with dactylitis at baseline using the Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI)), the modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI; in patients with psoriatic nail disease at baseline; one target nail was selected at baseline) and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI; in patients with axial involvement (score ≥4) at baseline). Patient-reported outcome measures reported include the HAQ-DI, Short Form 36-item health survey‍ Physical Component Summary (SF-36 PCS), Psoriatic Arthritic Impact of Disease-12 item Questionnaire (PsAID-12), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue and Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP).

Safety is reported through Week 52, including incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), treatment-emergent serious adverse events (SAEs) and TEAEs leading to study withdrawal. Where applicable, the exposure-adjusted incidence rate (EAIR) per 100 patient-years (PY) is reported.

Prespecified safety topics of interest included infections (serious, opportunistic, fungal and tuberculosis (TB)), neutropenia, hypersensitivity, suicidal ideation and behaviour (SIB), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), liver function test changes/enzyme elevations, malignancies and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). SIB, MACE and IBD events were adjudicated by external adjudication committees. An independent data monitoring committee periodically reviewed the safety data collected during the study.

Statistical analysis

Statistical powering and sample size determination are reported in the BE OPTIMAL primary manuscript.13 The study was powered to show the statistical superiority of BKZ compared with PBO for the primary end point of ACR50 at Week 16. The study was not powered for statistical comparisons of ADA with BKZ or PBO. No statistical comparisons were made between ADA and BKZ or PBO.

Missing data for binary end points were imputed using non-responder imputation (NRI). P values for these end points were determined using logistic regression adjusted for treatment, region and bone erosion at baseline (0 or ≥1). Observed case data are also reported for binary end points. Continuous outcomes are reported using multiple imputation for missing data. Bone erosion stratification for statistical analyses was based on actual erosion at baseline (assessed using centrally read radiographs, for which readings were more precise than the randomisation stratum for bone erosion). All analyses were done with SAS, V.9.3 or higher.

Results

Patient disposition and baseline characteristics

Of the 1,158 patients screened, 852 were randomised. Of those, 770 (90.4%) completed Week 52 (figure 1). Overall, 257/281 (91.5%) PBO/BKZ-treated patients, 388/431 (90.0%) BKZ-treated patients and 125/140 (89.3%) patients in the ADA group completed Week 52. Of the 271 patients who switched to BKZ from PBO at Week 16, 257 (94.8%) completed Week 52. As per the protocol, patients withdrawn from study treatment could return for all remaining study visits; of the patients that remained in the study at Week 52, 9 (1.1%) were not on randomised treatment (2 (0.7%) PBO/BKZ-treated patients; 5 (1.2%) BKZ-treated patients; 2 (1.4%) patients in the ADA group).

Figure 1

Patient disposition. The percentage of patients completing or not completing treatment periods is calculated with the initial number of patients who were randomised to that group. Completed not on randomised treatment refers to patients that stopped treatment but continued in the study. ADA, adalimumab; BKZ, bimekizumab; Q2W, every 2 weeks; Q4W, every 4 weeks.

The most common reasons for discontinuation in the active treatment-blind period were adverse events (PBO/BKZ:‍ 6 (2.2%); BKZ:‍ 9 (2.2%); ADA:‍ 4 (2.9%)), withdrawal of consent (PBO/BKZ:‍ 4 (1.5%); BKZ:‍ 9 (2.2%); ADA:‍ 2 (1.5%)) and lack of efficacy (PBO/BKZ:‍ 1 (0.4%); BKZ:‍ 6 (1.4%); ADA:‍ 4 (2.9%)).

Important protocol deviations were reported for 29 (3.5%) patients from Weeks 16 to ‍52. No patients were excluded from the pharmacokinetic per-protocol set. Important protocol deviations for the double-blind treatment period can be found in the BE OPTIMAL primary manuscript13; important protocol deviations for the active treatment-blind period are reported in online supplemental table 1.

As previously reported, baseline patient demographics and disease characteristics were comparable between treatment groups (table 1).13

Table 1

Patient demographics and baseline disease characteristics

Efficacy

The percentage of patients achieving ACR50 was sustained from Week 16 to Week 52 in patients receiving BKZ. At Week 16, 28/281 (10.0%), 189/431 (43.9%) and 64/140 (45.7%) patients treated with PBO, BKZ and ADA, respectively, achieved ACR50 (NRI; table 2; figure 2C). At Week 52, approximately half of patients continuing active treatment achieved ACR50 (BKZ: 235 (54.5%); ADA: 70 (50.0%)). In patients who switched from PBO to BKZ at Week 16, a similar proportion of patients achieved ACR50 at Week 52 (149 (53.0%); figure 2C) compared to patients initially randomised to BKZ.

Table 2

Efficacy end points at Week 16 and Week 52

Figure 2

ACR responders to Week 52. Randomised set. P value was calculated using a logistic regression model with treatment, bone erosion at baseline and region as stratification factors. The study was not powered for statistical comparisons of ADA with BKZ or PBO. All data points can be found in table format in online supplemental table 5. *ACR50 at Week 16 was the primary end point. ACR20/50/70, American College of Rheumatology response criteria ≥20%/50%/70% improvement; ADA, adalimumab; BKZ, bimekizumab; NRI, non-responder imputation; OC, observed case; PBO, placebo; Q2W, every 2 weeks; Q4W, every 4 weeks.

ACR20 and ACR70 responses were also sustained to Week 52 in BKZ-treated patients (ACR20: 191 (68.0%) PBO/BKZ, 307 (71.2%) BKZ, 102 (72.9%) ADA; ACR70: 101 (35.9%) PBO/BKZ, 169 (39.2%) BKZ, 53 (37.9%) ADA; NRI; figure 2A,E). Observed case data are also shown in figure 2B,D,F. A consistent trend was seen across the individual components of the ACR response criteria with BKZ treatment (online supplemental table 2).

Improvements in skin, including complete clearance, were sustained from Week 16 to Week 52 in patients with ≥3% BSA affected by psoriasis at baseline. At Week 16, 4/140 (2.9%), 133/217 (61.3%) and 28/68 (41.2%) patients treated with PBO, BKZ and ADA, respectively, achieved PASI90. At Week 52, 155 (71.4%) BKZ-treated patients and 41 (60.3%) ADA-treated patients achieved PASI90 at Week 52 (NRI; figure 3C; table 2). Compared to patients initially randomised to BKZ, a similar proportion of patients who switched from PBO to BKZ at Week 16 achieved PASI90 response at Week 52 (106 (75.7%)). At Week 52, 91 (65.0%) PBO/BKZ-treated patients and 132 (60.8%) BKZ-treated patients achieved complete skin clearance (PASI100; NRI; figure 3E). In total, 33 (48.5%) ADA-treated patients achieved PASI100. PASI75 responder rates are shown in figure 3A (NRI). Observed case data are also shown in figure 3B,D,F.

Figure 3

PASI responders to Week 52. Randomised set, in patients with psoriasis affecting ≥3% BSA at baseline. P value was calculated using a logistic regression model with treatment, bone erosion at baseline and region as stratification factors. The study was not powered for statistical comparisons of ADA with BKZ or PBO. All data points can be found in table format in online supplemental table 6. *PASI90 was a ranked secondary end point. ADA, adalimumab; BKZ, bimekizumab; BSA, body surface area; NRI, non-responder imputation; OC, observed case; PASI75/90/100, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index ≥75%/90%/100% improvement; PBO, placebo; Q2W, every 2 weeks; Q4W, every 4 weeks.

The percentage of patients achieving MDA improved from Week 16 to Week 52 in patients initially randomised to BKZ at baseline. At Week 16, 37 (13.2%), 194 (45.0%) and 63 (45.0%) patients treated with PBO, BKZ and ADA, respectively, achieved MDA (NRI; table 2). At Week 52, 237 (55.0%) BKZ-treated patients and 74 (52.9%) ADA-treated patients achieved MDA. Compared to patients initially randomised to BKZ, a similar proportion of patients who switched from PBO to BKZ at Week 16 achieved MDA response at Week 52 (151 (53.7%); NRI; figure 4A).

Figure 4

Additional efficacy end points. Randomised set. P value was calculated using a logistic regression model with treatment, bone erosion at baseline and region as stratification factors. The study was not powered for statistical comparisons of ADA with BKZ or PBO. All data points can be found in table format in online supplemental table 7. *MDA was a ranked secondary end point; †In patients with psoriasis affecting ≥3% BSA at baseline; PBO/BKZ: n=140; BKZ: n=217; ADA: n=68. ACR50, American College of Rheumatology response criteria ≥50% improvement; ADA, adalimumab; BKZ, bimekizumab; BSA, body surface area; MDA, minimal disease activity; NRI, non-responder imputation; OC, observed case; PASI100, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100% improvement; PBO, placebo; Q2W, every 2 weeks; Q4W, every 4 weeks; VLDA, very low disease activity.

Responder rates were sustained from Week 16 to Week 52 for VLDA (Week 16:‍ 3 (1.1%) PBO, 63 (14.6%) BKZ, 22 (15.7%) ADA; Week 52: 62 (22.1%) PBO/BKZ, 125 (29.0%) BKZ, 39 (27.9%) ADA; NRI; figure 4C) and ACR50+PASI100 (Week 16: 0/140 PBO, 60/217 (27.6%) BKZ and 11/68 (16.2%) ADA; Week 52: 65 (46.4%) PBO/BKZ, 102 (47.0%) BKZ, 24 (35.3%) ADA; NRI; figure 4E). Observed case data are also shown in figure 4B,D,F.

Improvements in enthesitis and dactylitis in patients with enthesitis or dactylitis at baseline were sustained from Week 16 to Week 52 (complete resolution of enthesitis at Week 52 (LEI): 44/70 (62.9%) PBO/BKZ, 87/143 (60.8%) BKZ, 21/36 (58.3%) ADA; complete resolution of dactylitis at Week 52 (LDI): 29/33 (87.9%) PBO/BKZ, 45/56 (80.4%) BKZ, 8/11 (72.7%) ADA; table 2). The percentage of patients achieving complete resolution of nail psoriasis, as measured by mNAPSI, improved from Week 16 to Week 52 (complete resolution of nail psoriasis at Week 52: 111/156 (71.2%) PBO/BKZ, 160/244 (65.6%) BKZ, 45/75 (60.0%) ADA).

Radiographic progression in the radiographic set was minimal to Week 16 (mean CfB (SE) in vdHmTSS: 0.25 (0.07) PBO, 0.03 (0.04) BKZ and −0.09 (0.08) ADA) and to Week 52 (0.17 (0.11) PBO/BKZ, 0.10 (0.07) BKZ and −0.12 (0.12) ADA). The majority of patients experienced no radiographic progression to Week 16 (222/250 (88.8%) PBO, 356/390 (91.3%) BKZ and 109/116 (94.0%) ADA) or to Week 52 (207/237 (87.3%) PBO/BKZ, 326/365 (89.3%) BKZ, 111/118 (94.1%) ADA; observed case data; online supplemental figure 2A). Cumulative probability plots of radiographic inhibition for Weeks 0–16 and Weeks 0–52 can be found in online supplemental figure 2B. Bone erosion and joint space narrowing subscores are reported in table 2.

Improvements in patient-reported physical functioning with BKZ were sustained from Week 16 to Week 52 (table 2); mean (SE) HAQ-DI CfB was −0.38 (0.03) for PBO/BKZ, −0.34 (0.02) for BKZ and −0.41 (0.05) for ADA at Week 52. Improvements in pain and fatigue with BKZ treatment were also sustained from Week 16 to Week 52 (mean (SE) PtAAP CfB: −31.8 (1.8) PBO/BKZ, −30.4 (1.4) BKZ, −32.7 (2.5) ADA; mean (SE) FACIT-Fatigue CfB: 5.5 (0.5) PBO/BKZ, 5.3 (0.4) BKZ, 5.5 (0.8) ADA; table 2). Similar results showing sustained improvement from Week 16 to Week 52 were observed across other health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes such as BASDAI, PsAID-12 and SF-36 PCS (table 2).

Safety

Up to Week 52, 555/702 (79.1%; EAIR/100 PY: 222.5) patients reported ≥1 TEAE while receiving BKZ treatment, including patients who switched from PBO to BKZ at Week 16; 113/140 (80.7%; EAIR/100 PY: 209.4) ADA-treated patients reported ≥1 TEAE to Week 52. Up to Week 52, 46 (6.6%; EAIR/100 PY: 7.9) patients receiving BKZ treatment and 10 (7.1%; EAIR/100 PY:‍ 7.5) patients receiving ADA treatment reported an SAE. In total, 21 (3.0%; EAIR/100 PY: 3.5) patients receiving BKZ and 7 (5.0%; EAIR/100 PY: 5.2) patients receiving ADA discontinued the study. One death occurred, in a BKZ-treated patient, unrelated to treatment (motorcycle accident; table 3). Week 16–52 safety data are reported in online supplemental table 4.

Table 3

Safety data to Week 52

The three most common TEAEs to Week 52 in patients receiving BKZ were nasopharyngitis (84 (12.0%); EAIR/100 PY: 15.2), upper respiratory tract infection (50 (7.1%); EAIR/100 PY: 8.7) and urinary tract infection (43 (6.1%); EAIR/100 PY: 7.3; table 3). In patients treated with ADA, the three most common TEAEs were nasopharyngitis (12 (8.6%); EAIR/100 PY: 9.4), ALT elevation (11 (7.9%); EAIR/100 PY: 8.5) and hypertension (9 (6.4%); EAIR/100 PY: 6.8).

In patients receiving BKZ to Week 52, six (0.9%; EAIR/100 PY: 1.0) patients had serious infections: one case each of cellulitis, gangrene of the oral cavity base, pneumonia, upper respiratory tract infection, cystitis and urinary tract infection. Overall, two (1.4%; EAIR/100 PY: 1.5) ADA-treated patients had serious infections, one patient with a case of otitis media and one patient with a case each of herpes zoster and atypical pneumonia. There were no cases of active TB.

Fungal infections were reported by the investigators for 82 (11.7%; EAIR/100 PY: 14.6; online supplemental table 3) patients receiving BKZ and two (1.4%; EAIR/100 PY: 1.5) ADA-treated patients. Of patients receiving BKZ, 54 (7.7%; EAIR/100 PY: 9.3) had a Candida infection, the majority of which were oral candidiasis (38 patients (5.4%); EAIR/100 PY: 6.5). Of ADA-treated patients, one (0.7%; EAIR/100 PY: 0.7) had a Candida infection (oral candidiasis). There were no serious or systemic Candida infections in either treatment arm. One Candida infection (oral candidiasis; 0.1% of BKZ-treated patients; EAIR/100 PY: 0.2) that resulted in study discontinuation occurred in a patient receiving BKZ. Cases of Candida were managed using standard antifungal treatment, with the majority of patients receiving nystatin or fluconazole. In BKZ-treated patients, 12 (1.7%) patients had recurrent candidiasis, as reported by the investigators.

To Week 52, nine (1.3%; EAIR/100 PY: 1.5) patients receiving BKZ and one (0.7%; EAIR/100 PY: 0.7) receiving ADA had an infection defined as opportunistic (definition provided in online supplemental appendix 1). No serious or systemic opportunistic infections were reported in patients treated with BKZ. In BKZ-treated patients, all opportunistic infections were localised, mucocutaneous and fungal in nature; four oesophageal candidiasis, two oropharyngeal candidiasis, one fungal oesophagitis, one fungal laryngitis and one upper respiratory tract fungal infection were reported (online supplemental table 3). The ADA-treated patient had a serious case of herpes zoster.

Four (0.6%; EAIR/100 PY: 0.7; table 3) patients had an event adjudicated as MACE up to Week 52 while receiving BKZ, three cases of stroke (two of which were thrombotic) and one case of myocardial infarction. Each of these patients had a history of cardiovascular events. No events adjudicated as MACE were reported in the reference treatment arm.

Of patients receiving BKZ, there were four cases of non-melanoma skin cancer (three basal cell carcinoma and one squamous cell carcinoma) and one case each of colon cancer, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (stage 0) and papillary thyroid cancer (table 3). No malignancies were reported in the ADA group.

In total, 15 (2.1%; EAIR/100 PY: 2.5) patients receiving BKZ and 13 (9.3%; EAIR/100 PY: 10.2) ADA-treated patients had injection site reactions (table 3). There were two (0.3%; EAIR/100 PY: 0.3) cases of IBD in patients receiving BKZ; no cases of IBD were reported in patients receiving ADA. There were no cases of adjudicated SIB in any treatment arm.

Discussion

BE OPTIMAL demonstrated long-term efficacy of BKZ up to Week 52 in patients with active PsA who were bDMARD-naïve across a range of PsA domains, including joints, skin, enthesitis, dactylitis and nails, as well as the inhibition of structural progression. Improvements in efficacy as assessed by stringent outcome measures were sustained from Week 16 to Week 52 with BKZ treatment, with a low rate of patient drop-out. Furthermore, safety was as expected with no new safety signals observed.

PsA is a chronic, long-term disease, and treatment goals include achievement of more stringent efficacy outcomes that are sustained over time. Improvements seen with BKZ in the BE OPTIMAL study indicate a long-term, sustained depth of response. Improvements in ACR50 and PASI100 observed at Week 16 continued to improve to Week 52 in patients initially randomised to BKZ. Patients who switched from PBO to BKZ at Week 16 had similar ACR50 and PASI100 responder rates at Week 52 to those initially randomised to BKZ. ACR50 responder rates in all treatment groups were 50% or greater, and PASI100 responder rates for BKZ-treated patients were greater than 60% at Week 52.

A similar trend of improvements sustained from Week 16 to Week 52 was observed for the composite end points MDA, VLDA and ACR50+PASI100, demonstrating the efficacy of BKZ treatment across multiple domains of PsA.4 This is particularly important as international guidelines emphasise the need to reduce disease activity across all active domains of the disease, as this is associated with better outcomes.4 A positive trend in the individual components of ACR indicate that no single component drove the overall response. For patients who switched from PBO to BKZ at Week 16, improvements in composite outcomes were observed to Week 52.

Prevention of structural joint damage is a key goal of treatment.4 Persistent inflammation in patients with PsA can lead to structural damage,17 but the majority of patients treated with BKZ experienced minimal changes in radiographic progression to Week 52. This is especially notable, as BE OPTIMAL did not include joint erosion or elevated C-reactive protein as inclusion criteria. Thus, it was more difficult to demonstrate inhibition of radiographic progression compared with other studies on biologics.

Improvements in efficacy were accompanied by improvements in physical function (HAQ-DI), HRQoL (SF-36 PCS, PsAID-12) and patient-reported pain and fatigue (PtAAP, FACIT-Fatigue), which have been identified by patients as important to address in managing their disease.18

BKZ was well tolerated and the safety profile was similar to previous studies in PsA and consistent with the known safety profile of BKZ.13 14 19 Numerical differences were observed between the safety profile of BKZ and the ADA reference arm. In line with the mechanism of action of BKZ and the contribution of IL-17 in host protection against mucosal fungal infection,20 increased incidence of fungal infections was observed in BKZ-treated patients compared with ADA-treated patients. In the BKZ group, all fungal infections were mucocutaneous and localised. All cases of Candida were mild or moderate in severity and the majority were assessed as treatment related by the investigator. There were no cases of systemic candidiasis and the vast majority of cases did not lead to patients discontinuing treatment. The rate of Candida infections observed with BKZ treatment to Week 52 in BE OPTIMAL was consistent with those reported to Week 52 in the BE COMPLETE sister study and its OLE, BE VITAL, and the phase IIb trial of BKZ in PsA to three years.19 21 Rates were also similar to those reported in axial spondyloarthritis,22 and lower than those reported in psoriasis.23

In BKZ-treated patients, there were four cases of MACE and three malignancies excluding non-melanoma skin cancers. None were observed in the reference arm. Numerically higher rates of injection site reactions and liver enzyme elevations were observed in the ADA treatment group than the BKZ treatment group.

A limitation of this study is the small size of the subgroups of patients with enthesitis or dactylitis at baseline. In the primary analysis described previously, these subgroups were pooled with the BE COMPLETE study as part of the statistical hierarchy, to ensure adequate power for statistical analysis.13 In this manuscript, enthesitis and dactylitis subgroups were reported for BE OPTIMAL only. Despite this, a numerical difference was observed between BKZ and PBO at Week 16, and PBO/BKZ patients demonstrated similar resolution of both enthesitis and dactylitis at Week 52. Another limitation is that the study was not powered for statistical comparisons of ADA with BKZ, therefore no such comparisons between treatments can be made.

BKZ has demonstrated efficacy and tolerability to 52 weeks in bDMARD-naïve patients with active PsA. Data are reported to Week 52, which was the duration of the BE OPTIMAL study. However, PsA is a chronic, lifelong disease, therefore longer-term data are needed to further assess the long-term safety and efficacy profile of BKZ; longer treatment exposure is still required. Data from the BE VITAL OLE will assess BKZ treatment in patients with active PsA over three years to further assess long-term efficacy and tolerability. The long-term safety profile of BKZ, particularly the increased risk of fungal infections, will be important to further characterise and consider in context with the mechanistic benefits of dual inhibition of IL-17A and IL-17F in achieving complete skin clearance and will be particularly relevant for treatment decisions in clinical practice.13 14 24 In addition to the OLE, further observational research on outcomes in real-world datasets would aid extrapolation of these results to routine clinical populations.

In conclusion, dual inhibition of IL-17A and IL-17F with BKZ in bDMARD-naïve patients with active PsA resulted in sustained long-term, clinically meaningful improvements across the PsA disease domains, determined using stringent efficacy measures. Efficacy on BKZ treatment was sustained from Week 16 to Week 52 in patients initially randomised to BKZ; patients who switched from PBO to BKZ at Week 16 achieved similar levels of efficacy at Week 52 to patients initially randomised to BKZ. BKZ was well tolerated and the safety profile was consistent with prior studies. Long-term safety and efficacy data will be assessed in the ongoing OLE study, BE VITAL.

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request. Data from this manuscript may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the USA and/or Europe, or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion. Investigators may request access to anonymised individual patient data and redacted study documents which may include: raw datasets, analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, blank case report form, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.Vivli.org and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a prespecified time, typically 12 months, on a password-protected portal.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Ethics approval

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Conference on Harmonisation guidance for Good Clinical Practice. Ethical approval was obtained from the relevant institutional review boards at participating sites, and all patients provided written informed consent in accordance with local requirements.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the patients, the investigators and their teams who took part in this study. A portion of this work has been previously presented at ACR 2022 (abstract number: L02). The authors also acknowledge Heather Edens, PhD, UCB Pharma, Smyrna, GA, USA, for publication coordination and editorial assistance, Nadine Goldammer for her work as Clinical Programme Delivery Lead for the BKZ PsA programme, Deepak Assudani for his work in the BKZ PsA programme and Laura Mawdsley, MSc, and Sona Popat, BA, Costello Medical, Cambridge, UK, for medical writing and editorial assistance based on the authors’ input and direction.

References

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

Footnotes

  • Handling editor Josef S Smolen

  • Twitter @LGossec

  • Correction notice This article has been corrected since it published Online First. The results section of the abstract has been updated for clarity.

  • Contributors Substantial contributions to study conception and design: CTR, LCC, IBM, PJM, JFM, YT, AA, LG, ABG, RBW, BI, RB, VS, JC, RBML; substantial contributions to analysis and interpretation of the data: CTR, LCC, IBM, PJM, JFM, YT, AA, LG, ABG, RBW, BI, RB, VS, JC, RBML; drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content: CTR, LCC, IBM, PJM, JFM, YT, AA, LG, ABG, RBW, BI, RB, VS, JC, RBML; final approval of the version of the article to be published: CTR, LCC, IBM, PJM, JFM, YT, AA, LG, ABG, RBW, BI, RB, VS, JC, RBML; manuscript guarantor: BI.

  • Funding This study was sponsored by UCB Pharma. Support for third-party writing assistance for this article, provided by Laura Mawdsley, MSc, Costello Medical, Cambridge, UK, was funded by UCB Pharma in accordance with Good Publication Practice (GPP3) guidelines (http://www.ismpp.org/gpp3). RBW is supported by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203308).

  • Competing interests CTR: research for AbbVie; consultant for Amgen, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. LCC: has received grants/research support from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma; worked as a paid consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Domain, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Moonlake, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma; and has been paid as a speaker for AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. IBM: consulting fees and honoraria from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cabaletta, Causeway Therapeutics, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Evelo, Janssen, Moonlake, Novartis and UCB Pharma; research support from BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis and UCB Pharma; Associate Editor at Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. PJM: research grants from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma and UCB Pharma; consultancy fees from AbbVie, Acelyrin, Aclaris, Amgen, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Moonlake Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma and UCB Pharma; speakers’ bureau from AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. JFM: consultant and/or investigator for AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sun Pharma and UCB Pharma. YT: speaking fees and/or honoraria from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GSK, Pfizer, Taiho and Taisho; received grants from Chugai, Eisai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe and Taisho; Editorial Board Member at Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. AA: honoraria and/or research grants from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, LEO Pharma, Maruho, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, Taiho Pharma, Torii Pharmaceutical and UCB Pharma. LG: research grants from Sandoz and UCB Pharma; consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz and UCB Pharma; Editorial Board Member at Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. ABG: received honoraria as an advisory board member and consultant for Amgen, AnaptypsBio, Avotres Therapeutics, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dice Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Sanofi, UCB Pharma and Xbiotech; has received research/educational grants from AnaptypsBio, BMS, Moonlake Immunotherapeutics, Novartis and UCB Pharma (all paid to Mount Sinai School of Medicine). RBW: consulting fees from AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Arena, Astellas, Avillion, Biogen, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and UCB Pharma; research grants to his institution from AbbVie, Almirall, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Novartis and UCB Pharma; honoraria from Astellas, DiCE, GSK and Union. BI: employee of UCB Pharma and shareholder of AbbVie, GSK and UCB Pharma. RB, VS, JC are all employees and shareholders of UCB Pharma. RL: consultancy fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. Research grants from AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. Owner of Rheumatology Consultancy BV, an AMS company under Dutch law; Editorial Board Member at Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.