Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Correspondence on ‘Characteristics associated with hospitalisation for COVID-19 in people with rheumatic disease: data from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance physician-reported registry’ by Gianfrancesco et al. Compassionate use of tocilizumab in severe COVID-19 with hyperinflammation prior to advent of clinical trials – a real-world district general hospital experience
  1. Asim Khan1,
  2. Alice Cole1,
  3. Naveen Bhadauria1,
  4. Munzir El-Hassan2,
  5. Daud Abdulla3,
  6. Thomas Axon1,
  7. Zozik Fattah1,
  8. Jessica J Manson4,
  9. Jeronimo Moreno-Cuesta2,
  10. Dev Mukerjee1
  1. 1 Rheumatology Department, North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
  2. 2 Critical Care Department, North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
  3. 3 Pharmacy Department, North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
  4. 4 Rheumatology Department, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Asim Khan, North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust, London N18 1QX, UK; asim.khan7{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has resulted in a global pandemic with multiple casualties. Within the UK, specific groups of patients including those with rheumatic diseases requiring significant immunosuppression were advised to shield from the public to protect themselves from COVID-19 during the heart of the pandemic.1 In their important paper, Gianfrancesco et al found lower rates of hospitalisation in patients with rheumatic diseases with COVID-19 who were taking traditional synthetic and biological disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs).2 With regard to biologic DMARDs, most of their registry patients were taking tumour necrosis factor inhibitors but did also include other therapies including interleukin-6 (IL-6) antagonists.

They also provide an interesting suggestion of the potential benefit of biologic DMARD therapy in COVID-19 patients particularly in cases associated with a hyperinflammatory response. Indeed, it has been recognised that subsets of COVID-19 patients can develop a cytokine storm involving the uncontrolled production of cytokines such as IL-6.3 4 Moreover, observational studies suggest the potential benefit of IL-6-antagonism using tocilizumab (TOC).5–7 Internationally, TOC has been used in Italy, China and Ireland.8–10

Early during the UK pandemic, there was no access to clinical trials. Moreover, our Trust faced the second highest pressure index in the UK in relation to the number of admissions of COVID-19 patients.11 Our intensive care unit and general medical inpatient wards had to expand within our hospital to meet the necessary demands of patient care. We also recognised that certain COVID-19 patients developed significant inflammatory responses. Based on this, published observational data elsewhere and the lack of early access to clinical trials, we proposed the compassionate use of TOC in a specific subset of COVID-19 patients.

In March 2020, we identified patients with severe COVID-19 and hyperinflammation. We defined severe COVID-19 as any patient with positive COVID-19 PCR swab and respiratory failure requiring a minimum of 40% oxygen therapy. Hyperinflammation was defined as a ferritin above 500 ng/mL with upgoing trend, and a C-reactive peptide (CRP) above 100 mg/L. The decision to initiate TOC necessitated multidisciplinary discussion between intensivists, pharmacists and both local and tertiary care rheumatologists. This was a novel approach to bedside therapeutic decision-making, reflecting the close collaboration between clinicians in secondary and tertiary care, thereby directly sharing specialist experience and knowledge at the clinical coalface. The TOC treatment regime consisted of two intravenous doses at 8 mg/kg 12 hours apart. We would consider a third dose after 24 hours if there was no significant improvement.

A total of eight patients (seven male, one female) received TOC with doses ranging between 400 and 700 mg. The mean age was 59.4 years (49–81 range) with seven belonging to the Black, Asian and Ethnic Minority (BAME) group. Three patients had no comorbidities. Seven patients required intensive care. Three patients improved following TOC administration and were discharged home. Two of these patients received TOC in intensive care within 24 hours of hospital presentation. The third patient avoided intensive care. The five deceased patients were all of BAME ethnicity and died of COVID-19-related complications. They were all in multiorgan failure at the time of TOC administration, receiving it 3–4 days following hospital presentation. All patients except one had improvements in CRP, and six had improvements in ferritin, triglycerides or D-dimer following TOC. Five patients had worsening transaminitis following TOC administration which was of no clinical significance. One patient was readmitted with pyelonephritis, acute kidney injury, ureteric stone and hydronephrosis requiring a ureteric stent and high-dependency care. This patient by administrative error received four doses of TOC at his initial admission. The patient made a full recovery. The clinical characteristics of the eight patients are summarised in table 1.

Table 1

Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients treated with tocilizumab (TOC)

In this unprecedented time, with limited treatment options available for rapidly deteriorating patients, we explored if IL-6 blockade with TOC may benefit a specific, defined subgroup of patients with evidence of hyperinflammation. One significant difference we note between our practice and published observational studies was the early administration of TOC in the latter. Therefore, we raise the question of whether TOC administration at an earlier disease course prior to the development of non-respiratory organ failure would be a more suitable therapeutic window.

The rapid evolution of conventional randomised controlled clinical trials meant that continuation of our compassionate approach could not be ethically justified or sustained. However, our real-world experience describes a clinical model of how newer therapeutic approaches can be rapidly implemented in the midst of a hitherto unprecedented pandemic. We also encourage clinicians to develop strong links with tertiary care experts so that patients can be channelled into appropriate trials at an earlier disease course. Furthermore, we encourage rheumatologists to continue to record characteristics of rheumatic patients with COVID-19 onto the Global Rheumatology Alliance registry as highlighted by Gianfrancesco et al.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication



  • Correction notice This article has been corrected since it published Online First. Data within the table has been corrected.

  • Contributors We can confirm that this manuscript has not been published and is not under consideration for publication in another journal. We can also confirm that all authors have contributed to the production of this publication. Dr AK was involved in the entire production of the manuscript, data collection and analysis as well as direct patient care and decision-making. Dr AC helped to put the draft together and proof-reading. Dr NB, Dr ZF and Dr DM were involved directly in patient care and also helped with proof-reading and draft rewrites. Dr ME-H, Mr DA and Dr TA were directly involved in patient care as well as data collection and analysis for the manuscript. Dr JJM was our tertiary care Rheumatologist who helped our local Rheumatology team with patient care. She also proof-read the manuscript and helped with draft rewrites. Finally, Dr JM-C was directly involved with patient care, helped with data collection and also proof-read the manuscript. Overall, each author meets the authorship criteria of the ICMJE.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting or dissemination plans of this research.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles