Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Article placement order within journal issues has the potential to influence perceived research importance, with earlier listed articles being more visible and more likely to be downloaded and cited.1 2 In an analysis of serial rheumatology journals published between 2013 and 2018, we reported that certain rheumatic diseases were prioritised within journal issues.1 Articles about rheumatoid arthritis were preferentially ordered at the front of issues, while other diseases including connective tissue diseases, crystal arthritis, paediatric syndromes and pain syndromes were consistently ordered towards the back. This prioritisation was evident in journals with disease-specific tables of contents sections within issues, but was not observed in journals that did not group content by disease category.
Prior to 2019, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (ARD) did not group articles within each issue by disease category. In the first issue of 2019, ARD announced ‘small but visible structural changes’ in which articles would be grouped within each issue by disease category.3 We set out to determine whether specific rheumatic diseases were prioritised or deprioritised by this change in policy.
We analysed all original research articles published in ARD between June 2013 and December 2019. Each article was coded into one of …
Handling editor Iain McInnes
Contributors JH contributed towards acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the data. ND contributed towards design of the study, and acquisition and interpretation of the data. GDG contributed towards design of the study and analysis and interpretation of the data. AG contributed towards design of the study and interpretation of the data. SS contributed towards design of the study, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the data. All authors were involved in drafting of the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final version to be published and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests ND has reported grants or personal fees from AstraZeneca, Horizon, Amgen, AbbVie, Pfizer and Janssen, outside of the submitted work. ND and SS work primarily in the field of gout research (a condition that was analysed in this research project). JH, GDG and AG declare no competing interests.
Patient and public involvement statement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.