Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Correspondence to ‘Slope sign’: a feature of large vessel vasculitis?
  1. Marcin Milchert1,
  2. Marek Brzosko1,
  3. Anne Bull Haaversen2,
  4. Andreas P Diamantopoulos2
  1. 1 Department of Rheumatology, Internal Medicine, Geriatrics and Clinical Immunology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Zachodniopomorskie, Poland
  2. 2 Rheumatology, Martina Hansens Hospital, Bærum, Norway
  1. Correspondence to Dr Marcin Milchert, Department of Rheumatology, Internal Medicine, Geriatrics and Clinical Immunology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Zachodniopomorskie, Poland; marcmilc{at}

Statistics from

We have read with great interest the observation of Dasgupta et al. 1 We would like to propose an extended definition of slope sign in giant cell arteritis (GCA) formerly named slide sign,2 ,3 and present our method of assessing it by using the anteromedial ultrasound examination method of the large supraaortic vessels.4

Slope sign is a pathologically increased intima-media thickness (IMT)5 that spreads over a long arterial segment and slides down to a normal brachial artery where a normal intima-media structure (double line) is observed. This definition contains a description of pathological findings in the axillary artery—a typical location for vasculitis in GCA, contrasting with normal findings in brachial artery—which is usually not involved by vasculitis.6 Slope sign may not be limited to the place of arterial bifurcation of the subscapular artery, which is a typical location of atherosclerotic plaque. A transition zone should be observed between the involved axillary artery and the uninvolved brachial artery to generate the slope sign. Consequently, visualisation of this zone in a single image helps to conclude on the presence of pathological IMT compared with the nearby normal vessel (figure 1). In addition to thickness, wall structure should be assessed: in a normal brachial artery intima-media appears as a double line, which disappears due to the inflammation in the axillary artery.7 Thus, the slope sign is best-observed at a long longitudinal view that avoids skipping areas or inadequate imaging from a series of short scans.

Figure 1

Tapering IMT leading to normalisation of vasculitic changes at the brachial artery at the point indicated by arrows.

The statement that the slope sign ‘may help to differentiate vasculitis from arteriosclerosis and other causes of arterial wall thickening’1 requires some attention. Lack of slope sign is well recognisable in the cases of general arterial wall thickening, for example, calciphylaxis or amyloidosis.8 However, the visualisation of a short transition zone may not be enough to differentiate the edge of vasculitis from non-calcified atherosclerotic plaque. Atherosclerosis is common and sometimes involves the axillary artery at the level of bifurcation of the subscapular artery (a region of turbulent flow predisposing to atherosclerosis). Yet, this is also a typical location of the slope sign in vasculitis. Therefore, we recommend examining the long course of axillary artery (both proximal and distal part) by using the anteromedial method (continuous ultrasonographic examination of the large supraaortic vessels), as vasculitis usually spreads along the whole arterial region of the axillary artery, up to the subclavian artery in contrast with atherosclerosis. The length of the slope in vasculitis is usually long, while atherosclerosis presents with a short slope.

Validation of the slope sign in 214 consecutive patients referred to fast track GCA clinic in Szczecin between 2011 and 2015 was performed. Out of 81 patients diagnosed with GCA axillary vasculitis was found in 23. In 50 patients, isolated PMR was diagnosed. In 83 patients, another diagnosis was confirmed and they served as controls. Lack of healthy controls is consistent with a real-life scenario but might had impact on results. In all patients with axillary vasculitis, slope sign was present. We calculated the slope sign reference range defined as axillary to brachial IMT ratio (figure 2). Statistical analyses were performed with STATA software (version 12.0; StataCorp). The area under the curve for the slope sign ratio was smaller compared with increased axillary IMT consistent with vasculitis (table 1).

Figure 2

Performance of axillary to brachial IMT ratio for the diagnosis of axillary arteritis. ROC, receiver operating characteristic.

Table 1

Cut-off values for slope sign (axillary to brachial IMT ratio) and increased IMT in the axillary artery (GCA patients vs controls)

Consequently, we think that the definition of the ultrasonographic slope sign should be descriptive and we agree with Dasgupta et al that slope sign is a helpful feature for large vessel GCA diagnosis.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Ethics approval

Ethical committee of Pomeranian Medical University KB-0012/111/10 and KB-0012/12/14.



  • Twitter @adiamanteas

  • Contributors MM: idea of slide/slope sign, material collection, presentation of the calculations and preparation of the manuscript. APD: idea of writing a commentary, images collection, idea of anteromedial ultrasound examination method and preparation of the manuscript. MB: preparation of the manuscript. ABH: images collection and preparation of the manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles