Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Regulatory T (Treg) cells play an important role in controlling immune responses. Their frequency is decreased in many autoimmune diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We read with great interest the article by Rosenzwajg et al which presents the results of a clinical trial with low-dose interleukin-2 (ld-IL-2).1 The authors report that Treg cell frequencies were significantly increased following ld-IL-2 administration in 46 patients with autoimmune diseases. Among them, four patients had RA and received a background therapy with low-dose prednisolone (PRED) or methotrexate (MTX). The study demonstrates that ld-IL-2 administration is a successful strategy to overcome Treg cell deficiency and to increase the ratio between Treg cells and effector T cells in patients with RA and other autoimmune diseases.
Here we want to draw attention to the fact that Treg cell frequencies in patients with RA can be increased by some, but not by all, antirheumatic drugs and that the background treatment can therefore affect the results of clinical trials with IL-2. Using flow cytometry, we analysed the ex vivo frequency of CD25highCD127lowFoxP3high CD4+ Treg cells in the peripheral blood of 112 patients with RA and 19 healthy individuals (figure 1A). To confirm the suppressive capacity of the Treg cells, we assessed their ability to suppress effector T cells using a classical Treg suppression assay (figure 1B, C). Our results and previous findings from other groups demonstrate that MTX (≥15 mg/week) and various biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) efficiently upregulate Treg cell frequencies to an almost normal level (figure 1D).2–5 We observed a significant increase in Treg cell frequencies in the peripheral blood of patients treated with MTX, adalimumab, etanercept, golimumab and tocilizumab. Concomitant medication with MTX did not further increase the percentage of Treg cells in patients treated with the biologicals. The RA patients in the study by Rosenzwajg et al were either treated with low-dose PRED (<15 mg/day) or with MTX (≤20 mg/week). Interestingly, the fold change from baseline in Treg cells reported by Rosenzwajg et al was higher in the low-dose-PRED group compared with the group with MTX background therapy. This could probably be due to higher baseline Treg cell levels in the MTX group. In striking contrast to MTX and biological DMARDs, we observed no increase in Treg cell frequencies in patients treated with the Janus kinase (JAK)1/2 inhibitor baricitinib or the JAK1/3 inhibitor tofacitinib (figure 1D). Additional treatment with MTX had no influence on the results.
The peripheral blood of patients with RA is characterised by a higher percentage of Th17 cells and the balance between Th17 cells and Treg cells is shifted.6 In RA patients, the Th17/Treg cell balance is not recovered by JAK inhibitors, although the percentage of Th17 cells is significantly suppressed (figure 1E). Even though JAK inhibition is an efficient treatment in RA, an increase in Treg cells could be beneficial for the patients. The influence of combined treatment with ld-IL-2 and JAK inhibitors on Treg cells has not been investigated yet. However, it is likely to be very low as JAK1 and JAK3 are located downstream of the IL-2 receptor. Taken together, our data confirm that MTX and biological DMARDs increase Treg cell frequencies. Moreover, they reveal that the percentage of Treg cells is not modified by JAK inhibitors. We suggest that the ability of background therapy to increase Treg cell frequencies is a critical factor that should be taken into account when planning future clinical studies on ld-IL-2 treatment.
Patient consent for publication
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Cologne (no. 13-091).
AM and PSW contributed equally.
Contributors AM, PSW, and DMK made substantial contributions to the study concept and design. AM, PSW, KK, JS, JvT and THH made substantial contributions to the acquisition of the data. AM, PSW, KK, JS, JvT, THH and DMK drafted the article or revised it critically for important intellectual content. All authors reviewed the draft and approved the submission of the manuscript.
Funding This work was supported by a grant from the Fritz Thyssen foundation (10.17.2.019MN to DMK), the Köln Fortune Program of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Cologne (PSW and DMK) and the foundation ‘Exzellenz initiieren’ - Stiftung Kölner Krebsforschung (DMK). AM was supported by a fellowship from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF): Professorinnenprogramm II, Förderung der Regelprofessur im Fach Archäoinformatik - 01FP14039G, Projekt-Nr.: 4600/8116/01).
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.