Article Text

Download PDFPDF

THU0409 A RANDOMIZED, PHASE 2 STUDY EVALUATING THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ANAKINRA IN DIFFICULT-TO-TREAT ACUTE GOUTY ARTHRITIS: THE ANAGO STUDY
Free
  1. K. Saag1,
  2. A. So2,
  3. P. Khanna3,
  4. R. Keenan4,
  5. S. Ohlman5,
  6. T. Kullenberg5,
  7. L. Osterling Koskinen5,
  8. M. H. Pillinger6,
  9. R. Terkeltaub7
  1. 1Uni Alabama, Birmingham, United States of America
  2. 2Uni Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
  3. 3Uni Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States of America
  4. 4Duke Uni School Med, Durham, United States of America
  5. 5Sobi, Stockholm, Sweden
  6. 6New York Uni School Med, New York, United States of America
  7. 7Uni California San Diego, La Jolla, United States of America

Abstract

Background: In gout, urate crystals deposited in and around joints trigger episodes of acute arthritis, mediated by the proinflammatory cytokine IL-1β. In uncontrolled studies, the IL-1 receptor antagonist anakinra appears effective in reducing pain and signs of acute flares in patients with difficult-to-treat gout. However, confirmatory, adequately-powered, prospective trials are lacking. The ‘anaGO-study’ (anakinra in gout) was a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 2 study investigating the efficacy and safety of anakinra in acute gout (NCT03002974).

Objectives: The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of two regimens of anakinra (100 or 200 mg daily s.c. injections for 5 days) compared to triamcinolone (single i.m. injection 40 mg) with respect to patient-assessed pain intensity. The primary endpoint was change in pain intensity from baseline to 24-72 hours (average of 24, 48 and 72 hours) in the most affected joint measured on a visual analogue scale (0-100 VAS). Secondary outcomes included: time to onset of effect, time to response, time to pain resolution, time to rescue medication use, patient’s and physician’s assessments of global response, clinical signs, inflammatory biomarkers and safety.

Methods: Patients were recruited who had acute gout based on ACR/EULAR 2015 gout classification criteria, and were unsuitable for anti-inflammatory therapy with NSAIDs and colchicine due to contraindication, intolerance or inefficacy. Patients were randomized to each group in a 1:1:1 ratio and stratified by urate-lowering therapy use (yes/no) and BMI (<30.0 or ≥30.0 kg/m2).

Results: 165 patients were randomized; 110 to anakinra (56 to 100 mg/day, 54 to 200 mg/day) and 55 to triamcinolone; 108 and 53 were included in the primary analysis, respectively. The median (range) age was 55 (25-83) years, 87% were male, mean disease duration was 8.7 years and mean number of self-reported flares during the past year was 4.5. The pain intensity, from baseline to 24-72 hours, decreased in both treatment groups; mean (95% CI) change was -39.4 (-46.8, -32.0) for triamcinolone and -41.2 (-46.3, -36.2) for anakinra. The 100 mg and 200 mg doses of anakinra were comparably effective in decreasing pain (100 mg/day: -41.8 [-48.9, -34.8] and 200 mg/day: -40.7 [-47.9, -33.4]). Mean (95% CI) difference in pain reduction between anakinra and triamcinolone treatment groups was -1.8 (-10.8, 7.1) (p-value = 0.688 for primary endpoint). The majority of secondary efficacy endpoints were numerically in favor of anakinra, and in most instances also statistically significant, in comparison to triamcinolone, e.g. physician’s assessment of clinical signs at 72 hours and patient’s and physician’s assessment of global response at Day 8. No unexpected safety findings were identified in any of the treatment groups.

Conclusion: Anakinra and triamcinolone reduced patient-assessed gout flare pain to similar degrees in patients for whom conventional therapy was ineffective or contraindicated. Both doses of anakinra showed comparable efficacy in pain reduction. The majority of secondary efficacy endpoints favored anakinra. Anakinra was shown to be an additional option for use during acute gout flares.

Disclosure of Interests: : Kenneth Saag Grant/research support from: Horizon, Sobi, Shanton, Grant/research support from: Horizon Pharma, Sobi, Shanton, Consultant of: Horizon and Sobi, Consultant of: Horizon Pharma, Amgen, Radius, LG-Pharma, Takeda, Sobi, Atom, Arthrosi, Alexander So Consultant of: Sobi, Grünenthal, Puja Khanna Grant/research support from: Dyve, Selecta, Sobi, Consultant of: Sobi, Horizon, Robert Keenan Consultant of: Sobi, Selecta, Horizon, Sven Ohlman Shareholder of: Sobi, Employee of: Former employee of Sobi, Torbjörn Kullenberg Shareholder of: Sobi, Employee of: Former employee of Sobi, Lisa Osterling Koskinen Shareholder of: Sobi, Employee of: Sobi, Michael H. Pillinger Grant/research support from: Horizon, Hikma, Consultant of: Sobi, Horizon, Robert Terkeltaub Consultant of: Sobi, Selecta, Horizon, Astra-Zeneca

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.